Mowen Posted December 30, 2007 Share Posted December 30, 2007 Didn't have the oportunity to watch the match. But saw the goals at the news. -No doubt Chelsea did win with an off-side. But I'm a bit confused about how the match was. Many writers in this thread says that Toon had that good match. From the match stats on NUFC homepage, is this to read: ...........................................Chelsea.................Newcastle Goals.......................................2............................1.......... Posession..............................64%.......................36%...... Shoots on target...................10............................2.......... Shoots off target....................6.............................1.......... Corners.................................12............................3.......... Fouls......................................9............................11.......... Most fouls............................Kalou (2)................Butt (3).... Yellow cards...........................1..............................2......... Red cards...............................0..............................0......... Scorers..............................Essien (29)...............Butt (56.. ..........................................Kalou (87)............................... Good to be positive, but did Toon really have that good match? You'd better hope HTL doesn't see this Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ATB Posted December 30, 2007 Share Posted December 30, 2007 Yeap we had a good game, espacially in secoend half. Martins haved a couple of really good opportunities but never shot. Duff almost had an open goal and we had quite alot of crosses that never went right in the box. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ATB Posted December 30, 2007 Share Posted December 30, 2007 A lot of Chelseas shot was also quite long distance even if they managed to came closer to goal. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kev Posted December 30, 2007 Share Posted December 30, 2007 well after the match, chelsea fans were saying how we 'deserved a point', we attacked and scared them so yes, we did play well brewcastle Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest neesy111 Posted December 30, 2007 Share Posted December 30, 2007 we played mainly chelsea reserves and still got beat, we had a better starting 11 than theres we should of won, if it wasn't for allardyce and his containment tactics which ultimely will get him the sack Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yorkie Posted December 30, 2007 Share Posted December 30, 2007 we played mainly chelsea reserves and still got beat, we had a better starting 11 than theres Is that a wind-up? Given > Hilario Beye > Belletti Alex > Caçapa Ben Haim > Taylor Bridge > N'Zogbia Mikel = Faye Ballack > Butt Essien > Smith Wright-Phillips > Milner Cole > Duff Martins > Kalou Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest alex Posted December 30, 2007 Share Posted December 30, 2007 I reckon Kalou is better than Martins like Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Knightrider Posted December 30, 2007 Share Posted December 30, 2007 I reckon Kalou is better than Martins like Same here, seriously as well. Although not by any big margin. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alberto2005 Posted December 30, 2007 Share Posted December 30, 2007 I reckon Kalou is better than Martins like Same here, seriously as well. Although not by any big margin. I don't, Kalou probably looks better than he is, i bet most other fans think Martins is very good. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ATB Posted December 30, 2007 Share Posted December 30, 2007 we played mainly chelsea reserves and still got beat, we had a better starting 11 than theres we should of won, if it wasn't for allardyce and his containment tactics which ultimely will get him the sack Is that a joke? Chelsea had still the better team and to say this is the b-team is also wrong. many of these are playing regulary. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ATB Posted December 30, 2007 Share Posted December 30, 2007 Dont like Kalou think he is overrated. the same with Martins even if I loke him. is not just good enough when it comes to finish the boll off. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TaylorJ_01 Posted December 30, 2007 Share Posted December 30, 2007 I'm pretty sure if Martins played for Chelsea he would be setting the place alight. Exciting player him, we aren't using him properly at all. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest alex Posted December 30, 2007 Share Posted December 30, 2007 I reckon Kalou is better than Martins like Same here, seriously as well. Although not by any big margin. I was being serious. Not a big fan of either player though. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest alex Posted December 30, 2007 Share Posted December 30, 2007 I'm pretty sure if Martins played for Chelsea he would be setting the place alight. Exciting player him, we aren't using him properly at all. He isn't good enough for Chelsea tbh. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Liam Liam Liam O Posted December 30, 2007 Share Posted December 30, 2007 I'm pretty sure if Martins played for Chelsea he would be setting the place alight. Exciting player him, we aren't using him properly at all. He isn't good enough for Chelsea tbh. Neither is Kalou then Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest alex Posted December 30, 2007 Share Posted December 30, 2007 I'm pretty sure if Martins played for Chelsea he would be setting the place alight. Exciting player him, we aren't using him properly at all. He isn't good enough for Chelsea tbh. Nor is Kalou then Fine, I've already stated I'm not a fan of either player. I think Kalou is better though. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yorkie Posted December 30, 2007 Share Posted December 30, 2007 Martins is a better out-and-out striker imo... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Synthespian Posted December 30, 2007 Share Posted December 30, 2007 Just seen the offside. Oh my F***ING GOD! What a complete joke. We'd have been a bit fortunate with a point anyway. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wallace Posted December 31, 2007 Share Posted December 31, 2007 I thought it was odd that whilst the players were arguing about the offside goal with Riley and the linesman, Chelsea TV replayed the goal (several times) on the big screens so everyone in the ground could see that it was offside. I wondered if Riley had seen it but felt that he could not reverse his decision. Really strange to see the goal finally given when everyone already knew for certain it was offside. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
madras Posted December 31, 2007 Share Posted December 31, 2007 I thought it was odd that whilst the players were arguing about the offside goal with Riley and the linesman, Chelsea TV replayed the goal (several times) on the big screens so everyone in the ground could see that it was offside. I wondered if Riley had seen it but felt that he could not reverse his decision. Really strange to see the goal finally given when everyone already knew for certain it was offside. for truth that happened in roy of the rovers,created a riot and was always a plausable scenario...life imitates comic Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now