Benwell Lad Posted January 5, 2009 Share Posted January 5, 2009 Check out the below report from the Sun. If only for the ludicrous sentence "Yet a near full strength Toon-missing only their injured players- did not do enough to win." Beggars belief. http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/sport/football/article2092369.ece Louise took a predictably similar tack in the Grauniad. She is one bitter bitch. Obviously the macum slag didn't get her vibrator for Christmas after all. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
pedro111 Posted January 15, 2009 Share Posted January 15, 2009 From reading the papers recently I get the feeling that almost every national sports writer wants to see our club go the way of Leeds. No one has anything good to say about the club but particularly the fans. I read a match report from the West Ham game in the Star I think and the writer basically blamed our fans for every thing thats wrong with the club. He was pleading with West Ham fans to "let it be Newcastle fans who rue what they have let slip through their fingers, not you" Fuck off you stupit cunt. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted January 15, 2009 Share Posted January 15, 2009 Fuck off you stupit cunt. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wallace Posted January 15, 2009 Share Posted January 15, 2009 Considering the very real fears we have about what is going on at our club and the motives and actions (or lack of) of Ashley and co., I am surprised that the media have not really commented on it apart from a sly dig here and there in a match report. There seems to be much more concern and anguish over what might happen at Spurs, West Ham and Portsmouth. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tooj Posted January 15, 2009 Share Posted January 15, 2009 From reading the papers recently I get the feeling that almost every national sports writer wants to see our club go the way of Leeds. No one has anything good to say about the club but particularly the fans. I read a match report from the West Ham game in the Star I think and the writer basically blamed our fans for every thing thats wrong with the club. He was pleading with West Ham fans to "let it be Newcastle fans who rue what they have let slip through their fingers, not you" Fuck off you stupit cunt. Yet when we start doing well they absolutely love us. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ikri Posted January 15, 2009 Share Posted January 15, 2009 Considering the very real fears we have about what is going on at our club and the motives and actions (or lack of) of Ashley and co., I am surprised that the media have not really commented on it apart from a sly dig here and there in a match report. There seems to be much more concern and anguish over what might happen at Spurs, West Ham and Portsmouth. There's a danger that we might lose even more players to injury & fuck up a few more results and end up relegated. The danger with West Ham & Portsmouth is that they might go bankrupt and cease to exist as football league clubs. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest black n white Posted January 15, 2009 Share Posted January 15, 2009 http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/teams/h/hull_city/7591035.stm Hull have beaten Newcastle to the signing of Guinea defender Kamil Zayatte, reports BBC Radio Humberside. mackems.gif Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Benwell Lad Posted February 24, 2009 Share Posted February 24, 2009 Tyne Tees Television reported recently on Saint Niall Quinn once again being holier than Mother Theresa when he revealed plans to reduce prices and give incentives for fans to buy tickets for next season. He was doing something great for football and their supporters. (SOS -capacity 48,000 - on occasions about 70% full for league games). Tonight TTTV reports Newcastle United offering reduced prices and incentives for next season's tickets (SJP capacity 52,000 - at worst seldom less than 90% full ) reported cynically as a move which has been forced upon them by poor performances both on and off the field. Why is our local media so biased towards Sunderland ? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Geordiesned Posted February 24, 2009 Share Posted February 24, 2009 Tyne Tees Television reported recently on Saint Niall Quinn once again being holier than Mother Theresa when he revealed plans to reduce prices and give incentives for fans to buy tickets for next season. He was doing something great for football and their supporters. (SOS -capacity 48,000 - on occasions about 70% full for league games). Tonight TTTV reports Newcastle United offering reduced prices and incentives for next season's tickets (SJP capacity 52,000 - at worst seldom less than 90% full ) reported cynically as a move which has been forced upon them by poor performances both on and off the field. Why is our local media so biased towards Sunderland ? Because all the sports reporters on both local BBC and ITV news are Mackems. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest firetotheworks Posted February 24, 2009 Share Posted February 24, 2009 Tyne Tees Television reported recently on Saint Niall Quinn once again being holier than Mother Theresa when he revealed plans to reduce prices and give incentives for fans to buy tickets for next season. He was doing something great for football and their supporters. (SOS -capacity 48,000 - on occasions about 70% full for league games). Tonight TTTV reports Newcastle United offering reduced prices and incentives for next season's tickets (SJP capacity 52,000 - at worst seldom less than 90% full ) reported cynically as a move which has been forced upon them by poor performances both on and off the field. Why is our local media so biased towards Sunderland ? This time I think they have a point. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Benwell Lad Posted February 24, 2009 Share Posted February 24, 2009 Tyne Tees Television reported recently on Saint Niall Quinn once again being holier than Mother Theresa when he revealed plans to reduce prices and give incentives for fans to buy tickets for next season. He was doing something great for football and their supporters. (SOS -capacity 48,000 - on occasions about 70% full for league games). Tonight TTTV reports Newcastle United offering reduced prices and incentives for next season's tickets (SJP capacity 52,000 - at worst seldom less than 90% full ) reported cynically as a move which has been forced upon them by poor performances both on and off the field. Why is our local media so biased towards Sunderland ? This time I think they have a point. Point is both clubs (like most others at present) fear a drop in crowds as the recession bites and felt the need to act. Despite Sunderland's empty seat problem being much worse than Newcastle's and one of the worst in the PL (Boro ?) it was reported as an act of charity while Newcastle's was reported as an act of desperation. Terrible reporting bias. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest BooBoo Posted February 24, 2009 Share Posted February 24, 2009 The head of sport at BBC Newcastle is a mackem season ticket holder and he was spied dancing in the stands after we lost at the SOL earlier in the season. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thespence Posted February 24, 2009 Share Posted February 24, 2009 Tyne Tees Television reported recently on Saint Niall Quinn once again being holier than Mother Theresa when he revealed plans to reduce prices and give incentives for fans to buy tickets for next season. He was doing something great for football and their supporters. (SOS -capacity 48,000 - on occasions about 70% full for league games). Tonight TTTV reports Newcastle United offering reduced prices and incentives for next season's tickets (SJP capacity 52,000 - at worst seldom less than 90% full ) reported cynically as a move which has been forced upon them by poor performances both on and off the field. Why is our local media so biased towards Sunderland ? This time I think they have a point. Point is both clubs (like most others at present) fear a drop in crowds as the recession bites and felt the need to act. Despite Sunderland's empty seat problem being much worse than Newcastle's and one of the worst in the PL (Boro ?) it was reported as an act of charity while Newcastle's was reported as an act of desperation. Terrible reporting bias. Because Sunderland have a history of having deals for all pockets, where as we have always whacked the price up year on year. We all loved it pre-credit crunch paying twice+ what Mackems did for there season tickets but now they have the better team & the cheaper tickets atm, which is a bit fucking annoying. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
iklgizmo Posted February 24, 2009 Share Posted February 24, 2009 Tyne Tees Television reported recently on Saint Niall Quinn once again being holier than Mother Theresa when he revealed plans to reduce prices and give incentives for fans to buy tickets for next season. He was doing something great for football and their supporters. (SOS -capacity 48,000 - on occasions about 70% full for league games). Tonight TTTV reports Newcastle United offering reduced prices and incentives for next season's tickets (SJP capacity 52,000 - at worst seldom less than 90% full ) reported cynically as a move which has been forced upon them by poor performances both on and off the field. Why is our local media so biased towards Sunderland ? This time I think they have a point. Point is both clubs (like most others at present) fear a drop in crowds as the recession bites and felt the need to act. Despite Sunderland's empty seat problem being much worse than Newcastle's and one of the worst in the PL (Boro ?) it was reported as an act of charity while Newcastle's was reported as an act of desperation. Terrible reporting bias. Because Sunderland have a history of having deals for all pockets, where as we have always whacked the price up year on year. We all loved it pre-credit crunch paying twice+ what Mackems did for there season tickets but now they have the better team & the cheaper tickets atm, which is a bit f***ing annoying. they havnt got a better team than us at the moment! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thespence Posted February 24, 2009 Share Posted February 24, 2009 Tyne Tees Television reported recently on Saint Niall Quinn once again being holier than Mother Theresa when he revealed plans to reduce prices and give incentives for fans to buy tickets for next season. He was doing something great for football and their supporters. (SOS -capacity 48,000 - on occasions about 70% full for league games). Tonight TTTV reports Newcastle United offering reduced prices and incentives for next season's tickets (SJP capacity 52,000 - at worst seldom less than 90% full ) reported cynically as a move which has been forced upon them by poor performances both on and off the field. Why is our local media so biased towards Sunderland ? This time I think they have a point. Point is both clubs (like most others at present) fear a drop in crowds as the recession bites and felt the need to act. Despite Sunderland's empty seat problem being much worse than Newcastle's and one of the worst in the PL (Boro ?) it was reported as an act of charity while Newcastle's was reported as an act of desperation. Terrible reporting bias. Because Sunderland have a history of having deals for all pockets, where as we have always whacked the price up year on year. We all loved it pre-credit crunch paying twice+ what Mackems did for there season tickets but now they have the better team & the cheaper tickets atm, which is a bit f***ing annoying. they havnt got a better team than us at the moment! I use a the league table as a guide until we are above them they are better. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Benwell Lad Posted February 24, 2009 Share Posted February 24, 2009 Tyne Tees Television reported recently on Saint Niall Quinn once again being holier than Mother Theresa when he revealed plans to reduce prices and give incentives for fans to buy tickets for next season. He was doing something great for football and their supporters. (SOS -capacity 48,000 - on occasions about 70% full for league games). Tonight TTTV reports Newcastle United offering reduced prices and incentives for next season's tickets (SJP capacity 52,000 - at worst seldom less than 90% full ) reported cynically as a move which has been forced upon them by poor performances both on and off the field. Why is our local media so biased towards Sunderland ? This time I think they have a point. Point is both clubs (like most others at present) fear a drop in crowds as the recession bites and felt the need to act. Despite Sunderland's empty seat problem being much worse than Newcastle's and one of the worst in the PL (Boro ?) it was reported as an act of charity while Newcastle's was reported as an act of desperation. Terrible reporting bias. Because Sunderland have a history of having deals for all pockets, where as we have always whacked the price up year on year. We all loved it pre-credit crunch paying twice+ what Mackems did for there season tickets but now they have the better team & the cheaper tickets atm, which is a bit f***ing annoying. I thought a patched up Newcastle team missing a lot of key players with several others playing out of position and no serious striker in the side, more than matched what was Sunderland's strongest possible team in the recent derby match. But everyone to their own. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thespence Posted February 24, 2009 Share Posted February 24, 2009 Tyne Tees Television reported recently on Saint Niall Quinn once again being holier than Mother Theresa when he revealed plans to reduce prices and give incentives for fans to buy tickets for next season. He was doing something great for football and their supporters. (SOS -capacity 48,000 - on occasions about 70% full for league games). Tonight TTTV reports Newcastle United offering reduced prices and incentives for next season's tickets (SJP capacity 52,000 - at worst seldom less than 90% full ) reported cynically as a move which has been forced upon them by poor performances both on and off the field. Why is our local media so biased towards Sunderland ? This time I think they have a point. Point is both clubs (like most others at present) fear a drop in crowds as the recession bites and felt the need to act. Despite Sunderland's empty seat problem being much worse than Newcastle's and one of the worst in the PL (Boro ?) it was reported as an act of charity while Newcastle's was reported as an act of desperation. Terrible reporting bias. Because Sunderland have a history of having deals for all pockets, where as we have always whacked the price up year on year. We all loved it pre-credit crunch paying twice+ what Mackems did for there season tickets but now they have the better team & the cheaper tickets atm, which is a bit f***ing annoying. I thought a patched up Newcastle team missing a lot of key players with several others playing out of position and no serious striker in the side, more than matched what was Sunderland's strongest possible team in the recent derby match. But everyone to their own. Do you not use the league table as a guide? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChezGiven Posted February 26, 2009 Share Posted February 26, 2009 Tyne Tees Television reported recently on Saint Niall Quinn once again being holier than Mother Theresa when he revealed plans to reduce prices and give incentives for fans to buy tickets for next season. He was doing something great for football and their supporters. (SOS -capacity 48,000 - on occasions about 70% full for league games). Tonight TTTV reports Newcastle United offering reduced prices and incentives for next season's tickets (SJP capacity 52,000 - at worst seldom less than 90% full ) reported cynically as a move which has been forced upon them by poor performances both on and off the field. Why is our local media so biased towards Sunderland ? This time I think they have a point. Point is both clubs (like most others at present) fear a drop in crowds as the recession bites and felt the need to act. Despite Sunderland's empty seat problem being much worse than Newcastle's and one of the worst in the PL (Boro ?) it was reported as an act of charity while Newcastle's was reported as an act of desperation. Terrible reporting bias. Because Sunderland have a history of having deals for all pockets, where as we have always whacked the price up year on year. We all loved it pre-credit crunch paying twice+ what Mackems did for there season tickets but now they have the better team & the cheaper tickets atm, which is a bit f***ing annoying. I thought a patched up Newcastle team missing a lot of key players with several others playing out of position and no serious striker in the side, more than matched what was Sunderland's strongest possible team in the recent derby match. But everyone to their own. Do you not use the league table as a guide? Aye, at the end of the season. You have to figure luck with injuries into it too. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
sempuki Posted August 16, 2009 Share Posted August 16, 2009 http://www.guardian.co.uk/football/2009/aug/15/newcastle-mike-ashley-barry-moat This is what the mysterious and obnoxious Louise Taylor looks like. Nowt flash as they say! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
toontownman Posted August 16, 2009 Share Posted August 16, 2009 http://www.guardian.co.uk/football/2009/aug/15/newcastle-mike-ashley-barry-moat This is what the mysterious and obnoxious Louise Taylor looks like. Nowt flash as they say! Flash in the pan? Although looks like the pan hit her in the face, that or she just farted. Bob Cass fancies a crack now: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-1206840/Newcastle-3-Reading-0-Hat-trick-hero-Shola-Ameobi-dedicates-Toon-win-Sir-Bobby-Robson.html Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Howaythelads Posted August 16, 2009 Share Posted August 16, 2009 http://www.guardian.co.uk/football/2009/aug/15/newcastle-mike-ashley-barry-moat This is what the mysterious and obnoxious Louise Taylor looks like. Nowt flash as they say! Doesn't matter what she looks like. I laugh at EVERYTHING she writes about Newcastle United because it's all taken from this forum and others. She's a know-nowt and as such, not worth taking seriously. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Phil K Posted August 16, 2009 Share Posted August 16, 2009 Nowt flash ? She's a sodding DOG. The face matches the prose. Reading that piece - its just petulant anger that we won and the crowd was great for the Championship. Disappointed ugly petulant cow - admittedly they all look like that in the Guardian - the butch politically correct"wimmin" paper. But this cow is as fine an argument against women reporting football as you'll get.. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jdckelly Posted August 16, 2009 Share Posted August 16, 2009 Ah the mackem bitch just can't stand a bit of positivity at newcastle can she and as for the mails attempt Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Stephen927 Posted August 16, 2009 Share Posted August 16, 2009 http://static.guim.co.uk/sys-images/Football/Pix/pictures/2008/09/18/louisetaylor.jpg Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Colocho Posted August 16, 2009 Share Posted August 16, 2009 ''Newcastle are set to offload Fabricio Coloccini to Palermo, while Andy Caroll is wanted by Wolves and West Ham, Jonas Gutierrez is set to leave for a Greek club, and Steven Taylor and keeper Tim Krul are also on their way out. (News of the World) The Magpies are hoping Real Zaragoza will harden their interest in central defender Coloccini, who is available for £4m. (Sunday Express) Everton are considering making a new move for Newcastle defender Steven Taylor after having a £4m bid rejected. (Sunday Express)'' Carroll won't go, neither will Taylor. Coloccini is going to breeze this league, would keep him. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now