Dave Posted March 29, 2008 Share Posted March 29, 2008 Ronaldo is dominating the Premier League in ridiculous fashion right now. Henry did the same for some time at Arsenal. Who wins? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ElDiablo Posted March 29, 2008 Share Posted March 29, 2008 T. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted March 29, 2008 Share Posted March 29, 2008 Ronaldo. Henry was great at what he did, but some of the things Ronaldo does with the ball is just unreal. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tooj Posted March 29, 2008 Share Posted March 29, 2008 Since when did Ronaldo play in The Premiership? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tooj Posted March 29, 2008 Share Posted March 29, 2008 I'd rather have had Bergkamp in his prime than both though. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted March 29, 2008 Share Posted March 29, 2008 Since when did Ronaldo play in The Premiership? I put his Christian name in the poll just for you. So rack off! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Unbelievable Posted March 29, 2008 Share Posted March 29, 2008 Ronaldo. Henry was great at what he did, but some of the things Ronaldo does with the ball is just unreal. You never thought what Henry did was a bit special? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tooj Posted March 29, 2008 Share Posted March 29, 2008 Ronaldo. Henry was great at what he did, but some of the things Ronaldo does with the ball is just unreal. I don't think his actual dribbling is as good as people make out in all honesty. His positioning, shooting, pace and power are amazing. But for someone with his supposed ability with the ball at his feet he never really beats many people and fires home. Not that you can argue with the form he's in though, but you know what I mean. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted March 29, 2008 Share Posted March 29, 2008 Ronaldo. Henry was great at what he did, but some of the things Ronaldo does with the ball is just unreal. You never thought what Henry did was a bit special? Yes I did...which is why I said I thought he was great. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ElDiablo Posted March 29, 2008 Share Posted March 29, 2008 I think they're both similar though that they were fortunate enough to play in teams that suit their game down to the ground, for Ronaldo an aggressive, direct all out attack team, which reflects his game. And Henry, lots of movement in the rest of the team creating lots of room and options for him, which he thrived on. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Taylor Swift Posted March 29, 2008 Share Posted March 29, 2008 I'm abstaining. I think that these arguments can't really be done until after a few years (at least) after the players have peaked. It's way too early to judge how much of an impact Ronaldo is currently having on football in general. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ronaldo Posted March 29, 2008 Share Posted March 29, 2008 Arsenal's system was tailor-made for Henry, great player but was never the best in the world Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cronky Posted March 29, 2008 Share Posted March 29, 2008 Ronaldo's a very, very good player, but a tad over-rated. Most of the time, his team are much better than the opposition, and he gets time, space and opportunities to run at defences with the ball. In those situations, he's devastating. When the opposition is stronger and he's got someone right up against him the second he receives the ball, it's a different story. It gets said that he doesn't produce on the big occasions. I'd say he finds it hard to produce against the best teams. As a player who'll help you win the League, he's extremely valueable. If I had to pick one player to help win the Champions League Final, I'd go for Rooney. He'll do it whatever the opposition. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Colos Short and Curlies Posted March 29, 2008 Share Posted March 29, 2008 Individually probably Henry, for me though Ronaldo adds that little je ne sais qua to the whole team which Henry never quite managed. A gnats pube between them though Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Parky Posted March 29, 2008 Share Posted March 29, 2008 Ronaldo's a very, very good player, but a tad over-rated. Most of the time, his team are much better than the opposition, and he gets time, space and opportunities to run at defences with the ball. In those situations, he's devastating. When the opposition is stronger and he's got someone right up against him the second he receives the ball, it's a different story. It gets said that he doesn't produce on the big occasions. I'd say he finds it hard to produce against the best teams. That's why he is often average in top European games. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tooj Posted March 29, 2008 Share Posted March 29, 2008 Individually probably Henry, for me though Ronaldo adds that little je ne sais qua to the whole team which Henry never quite managed. A gnats pube between them though Despite Henry being French, and Cristiano Portuguese? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Colos Short and Curlies Posted March 29, 2008 Share Posted March 29, 2008 Individually probably Henry, for me though Ronaldo adds that little je ne sais qua to the whole team which Henry never quite managed. A gnats pube between them though Despite Henry being French, and Cristiano Portuguese? Henry was all about the Va va voom man Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Parky Posted March 29, 2008 Share Posted March 29, 2008 You see if Man Utd wasn't dominating a game I'd doubt if Ronaldo would be as able to turn a match as Henry did for Arsenal. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Can Posted March 29, 2008 Share Posted March 29, 2008 henry is not as good as people make him out to be (he had flashes of class) went missing for long periods in games, was not good against big clubs in general the arsenal team made him look better then he was (nearly always sucked when he played for france)...horse face nistelrooy was a better forward imo and has been a success in all the leagues he has played in. in there prime...except ronaldo Bergkamp>>Ronaldo>>R.V.N.>>Henry Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The College Dropout Posted March 29, 2008 Share Posted March 29, 2008 In the bigger matches Rooney is the inspirational one. He may not score but he dominates the match. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Parky Posted March 29, 2008 Share Posted March 29, 2008 In the bigger matches Rooney is the inspirational one. He may not score but he dominates the match. Good point. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The College Dropout Posted March 29, 2008 Share Posted March 29, 2008 Bergkamp is a magnificent player but he wasn't as good as Henry when he was at his peak. I thought people stopped saying Henry didn't perform in the big matches when he scored 2 against Chelsea.. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
fredbob Posted March 29, 2008 Share Posted March 29, 2008 In my opinion Bergkamp was more talented than Henry but Henry got the absolute maximum out of his talent. Ronaldo for me, i think this big game thing is a bit of a myth, although no doubt there are stats whihc may show otherwise, but that game against Roma last year was one of the single best perfomrances ive seen from an individual for awhlie ( I know Smith got one as well but....) Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Taylor Swift Posted March 29, 2008 Share Posted March 29, 2008 Bergkamp is a magnificent player but he wasn't as good as Henry when he was at his peak. I thought people stopped saying Henry didn't perform in the big matches when he scored 2 against Chelsea.. Arsenal were dominated in that game against Chelsea though - not necessarily the best match to make Henry's case. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tooj Posted March 29, 2008 Share Posted March 29, 2008 Bergkamp is a magnificent player but he wasn't as good as Henry when he was at his peak. I thought people stopped saying Henry didn't perform in the big matches when he scored 2 against Chelsea.. Arsenal were dominated in that game against Chelsea though - not necessarily the best match to make Henry's case. Inter Meelan away. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now