Jump to content

Midfield holding role and Nicky Butt


Recommended Posts

Is it really necessary for Butt and only Butt to play this position? Granted we don't have a specialist alternative, but Keegan used Lee Clark in that role, so why not go for a Guthrie/Zog combination through the middle? I mentioned this before but Robson was forced to use Zog and Ambrose against Man U a few seasons back and they did very well. Zog is prone to losing the ball in possession , but then Butt is worse. We would have some running right through that midfield at any rate. Worth a go?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not sure, what you really need in the holding role is to be able to get around the pitch. You also need someone else in midfield who will do a bit of attacking.

 

Butt is so sluggish around the pitch, and conservative in possession, that I'm not sure he can cut it there anymore.

 

I really wanted us to get Muamba when he went to Bolton, would have been ideal IMO.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest MrSundlofer

Yes but it will never happen.

 

We don't want to gamble with that central midfield. Our managers during the years have seen Butt as a safe card in the midfield. A battling midfielder with influence and hard tackles. Sadly, this is so wrong. He should have played football 40 years ago.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guthrie could do a good job in the holding role IMO, but if you're talking about only playing 2 in the middle then I certainly wouldn't want Zog to be one of them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Going by what we've got I'd ideally like to see Guthrie and Barton put together. It would be a pretty hard working pairing with at least some ability. If you have Jonas and N'Zogbia either side pushing on both could cover well as well.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is it really necessary for Butt and only Butt to play this position? Granted we don't have a specialist alternative, but Keegan used Lee Clark in that role, so why not go for a Guthrie/Zog combination through the middle? I mentioned this before but Robson was forced to use Zog and Ambrose against Man U a few seasons back and they did very well. Zog is prone to losing the ball in possession , but then Butt is worse. We would have some running right through that midfield at any rate. Worth a go?

 

I'd play Bassong there

 

Stronger faster and can head the ball away rather than straight up in the air.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest MrSundlofer

Is it really necessary for Butt and only Butt to play this position? Granted we don't have a specialist alternative, but Keegan used Lee Clark in that role, so why not go for a Guthrie/Zog combination through the middle? I mentioned this before but Robson was forced to use Zog and Ambrose against Man U a few seasons back and they did very well. Zog is prone to losing the ball in possession , but then Butt is worse. We would have some running right through that midfield at any rate. Worth a go?

 

I'd play Bassong there

 

Stronger faster and can head the ball away rather than straight up in the air.

 

That's where we should have used Faye this season.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guthrie could do a good job in the holding role IMO, but if you're talking about only playing 2 in the middle then I certainly wouldn't want Zog to be one of them.

 

I am just fishing for options to get away from a pedestrian midfield tbh. Butt, Geremi and Cacapa are all slow and immobile. Xisco and Owen aren't lightning quick either, I am just looking at combinations which could give us a bit more off the ball running and keep up with the opposition as it were. The Arsenal model if you like, but obviously we can't match their quality.

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

One of the biggest mistakes we've made as a club recently was not breaking the bank for Lassana Diarra.

Harry claimed £15m deadline day bid. Us?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is it really necessary for Butt and only Butt to play this position? Granted we don't have a specialist alternative, but Keegan used Lee Clark in that role, so why not go for a Guthrie/Zog combination through the middle? I mentioned this before but Robson was forced to use Zog and Ambrose against Man U a few seasons back and they did very well. Zog is prone to losing the ball in possession , but then Butt is worse. We would have some running right through that midfield at any rate. Worth a go?

 

They actually used Steven Carr in a holding role in that match and infact Souness was in charge.

 

Nicky Butt is pathetic. Easily my least favourite player in our squad, in terms of chances that he has had. My opinion is that Geremi could play there, so long as he had someone with legs playing along side him.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Abdoulaye Faye looked excellent in the role against Chelsea. Big, strong, relatively mobile, good touch, good tackler, decent in tight situations. Although we didnt see it much, he has an excellent shot on him too. Miles, miles better than Butt.

 

Could, and should, have played there far more regularly. Keegan may be a good manager, but he's not perfect, and Butt's reputation and bullshit aura of being an excellent midfield battler/leader with a great attitude ensuring he was a guaranteed first teamer was one of Keegan's mistakes.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Abdoulaye Faye looked excellent in the role against Chelsea. Big, strong, relatively mobile, good touch, good tackler, decent in tight situations. Although we didnt see it much, he has an excellent shot on him too. Miles, miles better than Butt.

 

Could, and should, have played there far more regularly. Keegan may be a good manager, but he's not perfect, and Butt's reputation and bullshit aura of being an excellent midfield battler/leader with a great attitude ensuring he was a guaranteed first teamer was one of Keegan's mistakes.

 

I was actually surprised at how good Faye looked in that role on the rare occasion he was played there. It was a bit of an eye opener how good we could look with a powerful, athletic player in the position.

Link to post
Share on other sites

whats barton doin now, still banned?

 

When Barton's back I think a fair few would want him and Guthrie in the middle. Until then, it's just a case of finding a combo that doesn't look like condemned men.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm sick of hearing of all this talk about holding midfielders and attacking midfielders. It seems to be an obsession with fans today. madras knows what I'm talking about as we've mentioned this several times over.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm sick of hearing of all this talk about holding midfielders and attacking midfielders. It seems to be an obsession with fans today. madras knows what I'm talking about as we've mentioned this several times over.

 

Interesting point, it was probably the era of Vieira, Petit, Keane and Makelele that did it, everyone wanted a classly player in the middle who could break up the play.

 

It is quite fashionable though, how many premier league teams have a true holding player I wonder?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm sick of hearing of all this talk about holding midfielders and attacking midfielders. It seems to be an obsession with fans today. madras knows what I'm talking about as we've mentioned this several times over.

 

Interesting point, it was probably the era of Vieira, Petit, Keane and Makelele that did it, everyone wanted a classly player in the middle who could break up the play.

 

It is quite fashionable though, how many premier league teams have a true holding player I wonder?

 

I don't think in their primes Keane and Vieira were holding midfielders though.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't mind Butt in the holding role as long as he is supported with a bit of pace either side or ahead of him.  Butt is slow, but he still can read the game and close a man down or make a great tackle to break up play.  His game tends to turn shit when he realises that nobody else is attacking from midfield so he takes it upon himself to play it forward.  Problem is that he is dump at forward passes, long passes and long shots.  Sure, he has his moment where he does get them right, but 80% of the time he fails to make decent forward passes/shots.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm sick of hearing of all this talk about holding midfielders and attacking midfielders. It seems to be an obsession with fans today. madras knows what I'm talking about as we've mentioned this several times over.

 

Interesting point, it was probably the era of Vieira, Petit, Keane and Makelele that did it, everyone wanted a classly player in the middle who could break up the play.

 

It is quite fashionable though, how many premier league teams have a true holding player I wonder?

 

I don't think in their primes Keane and Vieira were holding midfielders though.

 

Are there any then?

 

Even if they weren't 100%, I can see why they were labelled as such, protecting the back 4 and getting a foot in all over the place. You're right though, they did get up and down the pitch a lot.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...