Teasy Posted August 11, 2011 Share Posted August 11, 2011 Yeah pitty Ameobi will play a part for definite Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Punk77 Posted August 11, 2011 Share Posted August 11, 2011 I still find the "there's 7 goals we need replacing" comment bizarre mind. It is really, I mean its 7 goals in 29 games, a pretty awful record. Shola could score 7 in 29, probably more. His goals to games ratio would say otherwise. Ameobi got 9 in 30 last season didn't he? Which is a better goals to games ratio. Regardless either of these two planks playing any predominant role in our season is fucking comical. It's not about them playing a PREDOMINANT role, it's about them filling in when we're up against inferior teams that we should be able to beat, even when resting one or two of our most valuable players. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
eliassenfredrik Posted August 11, 2011 Share Posted August 11, 2011 Our whole strikeforce, bar Demba is Championship strikers. You could say Best is a decent striker, at least he's better than Lovenkrands and Ameobi, and has some continuity. Ask yourselves this question; In which other Premier League club would Ameobi and Lovenkrands get a game? You should struggle to find more than 5. I find it worrying that this club, which is associated with such quality strikers from the past, now seem to settle for very average strikers, if that. I started supporting this club because of Alan Shearer, and seeing so many people defending the likes of Ameobi/Lovenkrands is just wrong. This club needs competitive genuine quality strike force, and shouldn't keep handing out contract extensions and hold on to nobodies. It sends out all the wrong signs. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
dcmk Posted August 11, 2011 Share Posted August 11, 2011 I still find the "there's 7 goals we need replacing" comment bizarre mind. It is really, I mean its 7 goals in 29 games, a pretty awful record. Shola could score 7 in 29, probably more. His goals to games ratio would say otherwise. Ameobi got 9 in 30 last season didn't he? Which is a better goals to games ratio. Regardless either of these two planks playing any predominant role in our season is f***ing comical. It's not about them playing a PREDOMINANT role, it's about them filling in when we're up against inferior teams that we should be able to beat, even when resting one or two of our most valuable players. Against the inferior teams, they know they are going to be fighting for survival come the end of the season, and will be up for it, the last thing you want to do is play with Lovenkrands, you are effectively a man down. Even in the Championship, every away game, this was the case. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Teasy Posted August 11, 2011 Share Posted August 11, 2011 Our whole strikeforce, bar Demba is Championship strikers. You could say Best is a decent striker, at least he's better than Lovenkrands and Ameobi, and has some continuity. Ask yourselves this question; In which other Premier League club would Ameobi and Lovenkrands get a game? You should struggle to find more than 5. I find it worrying that this club, which is associated with such quality strikers from the past, now seem to settle for very average strikers, if that. I started supporting this club because of Alan Shearer, and seeing so many people defending the likes of Ameobi/Lovenkrands is just wrong. This club needs competitive genuine quality strike force, and shouldn't keep handing out contract extensions and hold on to nobodies. It sends out all the wrong signs. I agree. Though think you might be rating some other Premier League teams too highly. I think players of Loven/Shola's quality get games for plenty of Premier League sides. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Disco Posted August 11, 2011 Share Posted August 11, 2011 I still find the "there's 7 goals we need replacing" comment bizarre mind. It is really, I mean its 7 goals in 29 games, a pretty awful record. Shola could score 7 in 29, probably more. His goals to games ratio would say otherwise. Ameobi got 9 in 30 last season didn't he? Which is a better goals to games ratio. Regardless either of these two planks playing any predominant role in our season is fucking comical. It's not about them playing a PREDOMINANT role, it's about them filling in when we're up against inferior teams that we should be able to beat, even when resting one or two of our most valuable players. Play Ranger, play Best, play Vuckic - don't play this waste of space. He's fucking terrible man, see the Everton match last season for a perfect example of someone who should not be playing topflight football. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jordan Posted August 11, 2011 Share Posted August 11, 2011 Championship poacher, great in 09-10. Best of luck in future good move by the club to get rid Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Punk77 Posted August 11, 2011 Share Posted August 11, 2011 I still find the "there's 7 goals we need replacing" comment bizarre mind. It is really, I mean its 7 goals in 29 games, a pretty awful record. Shola could score 7 in 29, probably more. His goals to games ratio would say otherwise. Ameobi got 9 in 30 last season didn't he? Which is a better goals to games ratio. Regardless either of these two planks playing any predominant role in our season is fucking comical. It's not about them playing a PREDOMINANT role, it's about them filling in when we're up against inferior teams that we should be able to beat, even when resting one or two of our most valuable players. Play Ranger, play Best, play Vuckic - don't play this waste of space. He's fucking terrible man, see the Everton match last season for a perfect example of someone who should not be playing topflight football. Yeah, but did you see him against West Ham, Wigan, Birmingham and Wolves.He was excellent in them and it's precisely against those kinds of teams I want Loven to play..Not against Everton ffs..That's precisely my point..If we play Wolves home and then Everton away, we could rest Ba against Wolves and have him fresh and ready for Everton Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest BlacknWhiteArmy Posted August 11, 2011 Share Posted August 11, 2011 He wasn't "excellent". Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
eliassenfredrik Posted August 11, 2011 Share Posted August 11, 2011 What's the point of resting Ba against Wigan? You don't see Man Utd resting Rooney against them. It's not a friendly. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Punk77 Posted August 11, 2011 Share Posted August 11, 2011 He wasn't "excellent". He was, against WH he scored and had a couple of assists, ditto Wolves Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Interpolic Posted August 11, 2011 Share Posted August 11, 2011 What's the point of resting Ba against Wigan? You don't see Man Utd resting Rooney against them. It's not a friendly. He's clueless man, he's coming out with this shite all the time. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sifu Posted August 11, 2011 Share Posted August 11, 2011 He wasn't "excellent". Decent at best. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Disco Posted August 11, 2011 Share Posted August 11, 2011 I still find the "there's 7 goals we need replacing" comment bizarre mind. It is really, I mean its 7 goals in 29 games, a pretty awful record. Shola could score 7 in 29, probably more. His goals to games ratio would say otherwise. Ameobi got 9 in 30 last season didn't he? Which is a better goals to games ratio. Regardless either of these two planks playing any predominant role in our season is fucking comical. It's not about them playing a PREDOMINANT role, it's about them filling in when we're up against inferior teams that we should be able to beat, even when resting one or two of our most valuable players. Play Ranger, play Best, play Vuckic - don't play this waste of space. He's fucking terrible man, see the Everton match last season for a perfect example of someone who should not be playing topflight football. Yeah, but did you see him against West Ham, Wigan, Birmingham and Wolves.He was excellent in them and it's precisely against those kinds of teams I want Loven to play..Not against Everton ffs..That's precisely my point..If we play Wolves home and then Everton away, we could rest Ba against Wigan and have him fresh and ready for Everton I did. He was shit against Wigan, got subbed off in the 2nd half at home IIRC, away game he was average at best. Brum home he was average at best and didn't do much. He might have scored against a couple of shit teams but that doesn't make him good and he was anything but excellent, I didn't catch seeing him with any MoM awards. Shola scored in Camp Nou FFS to prove my point. The thought of resting Ba (and I've barelt even seen him) for him makes me feel sick. It's a classic example of settling for not good enough. We're in positon to be fucking resting players. Get rid, get someone better in (fanciful thinking) Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Punk77 Posted August 11, 2011 Share Posted August 11, 2011 What's the point of resting Ba against Wigan? You don't see Man Utd resting Rooney against them. It's not a friendly. That's exactly what SAF is NOT doing..He's resting players when they're up against the weakest teams..Eg. Rooney. The same principle has his trainee, Solskjær, done in Molde..And Solskjær is very good at displaying trust towards his players..When he's asked questions like "you're fielding a weakened team today" he's responding that he got full confidence in the replacements..They will do the job..That of course make the squad players buckle up and run like idiots..A couple of Molde's players have taken huge steps this seasons because Solskjær's approach..which he got from SAF. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted August 11, 2011 Share Posted August 11, 2011 I still find the "there's 7 goals we need replacing" comment bizarre mind. It was in direct response to a couple of people implying he makes so little contribution we can afford to f*** him off without considering replacing him. I think it's inevitable we'll sign one striker of some description whether we rate him or not, so that'd put him 5th choice. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
biggs Posted August 11, 2011 Share Posted August 11, 2011 I still find the "there's 7 goals we need replacing" comment bizarre mind. It is really, I mean its 7 goals in 29 games, a pretty awful record. Shola could score 7 in 29, probably more. His goals to games ratio would say otherwise. Ameobi got 9 in 30 last season didn't he? Which is a better goals to games ratio. Regardless either of these two planks playing any predominant role in our season is fucking comical. It's not about them playing a PREDOMINANT role, it's about them filling in when we're up against inferior teams that we should be able to beat, even when resting one or two of our most valuable players. Play Ranger, play Best, play Vuckic - don't play this waste of space. He's fucking terrible man, see the Everton match last season for a perfect example of someone who should not be playing topflight football. Yeah, but did you see him against West Ham, Wigan, Birmingham and Wolves.He was excellent in them and it's precisely against those kinds of teams I want Loven to play..Not against Everton ffs..That's precisely my point..If we play Wolves home and then Everton away, we could rest Ba against Wolves and have him fresh and ready for Everton Pretty much lost for words Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
biggs Posted August 11, 2011 Share Posted August 11, 2011 What's the point of resting Ba against Wigan? You don't see Man Utd resting Rooney against them. It's not a friendly. That's exactly what SAF is NOT doing..He's resting players when they're up against the weakest teams..Eg. Rooney. The same principle has his trainee, Solskjær, done in Molde..And Solskjær is very good at displaying trust towards his players..When he's asked questions like "you're fielding a weakened team today" he's responding that he got full confidence in the replacements..They will do the job..That of course make the squad players buckle up and run like idiots..A couple of Molde's players have taken huge steps this seasons because Solskjær's approach..which he got from SAF. So your saying we have adequete replacements against the Wigans of this world when we could be possibly be in a relegation battle next season Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sifu Posted August 11, 2011 Share Posted August 11, 2011 Punk77, ever the optimist. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
eliassenfredrik Posted August 11, 2011 Share Posted August 11, 2011 What's the point of resting Ba against Wigan? You don't see Man Utd resting Rooney against them. It's not a friendly. That's exactly what SAF is NOT doing..He's resting players when they're up against the weakest teams..Eg. Rooney. The same principle has his trainee, Solskjær, done in Molde..And Solskjær is very good at displaying trust towards his players..When he's asked questions like "you're fielding a weakened team today" he's responding that he got full confidence in the replacements..They will do the job..That of course make the squad players buckle up and run like idiots..A couple of Molde's players have taken huge steps this seasons.. That's not how I remember it. And ffs, you can't compare the Norwegian league to Premier League. In your philosophy, we should rest pretty much the whole XI, and send out our garbage subs? Yes, most of them will probably run like idiots, but that doesn't help much does it. Furthermore, assuming Newcastle finishes top 12, we should rest the likes of Ba and let's say Tiote against the 8 other teams? Jesus christ man. Go fish. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Punk77 Posted August 11, 2011 Share Posted August 11, 2011 What's the point of resting Ba against Wigan? You don't see Man Utd resting Rooney against them. It's not a friendly. That's exactly what SAF is NOT doing..He's resting players when they're up against the weakest teams..Eg. Rooney. The same principle has his trainee, Solskjær, done in Molde..And Solskjær is very good at displaying trust towards his players..When he's asked questions like "you're fielding a weakened team today" he's responding that he got full confidence in the replacements..They will do the job..That of course make the squad players buckle up and run like idiots..A couple of Molde's players have taken huge steps this seasons because Solskjær's approach..which he got from SAF. So your saying we have adequete replacements against the Wigans of this world when we could be possibly be in a relegation battle next season You're still not getting it....We need another striker, that's obvious..But we also have a extremely good midfield that enables us to use a 4-5-1 formation..So relax..All I'm saying is that we should ROTATE players sometimes to avoid injuries.That enables us to field our best team against the best opponents Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
eliassenfredrik Posted August 11, 2011 Share Posted August 11, 2011 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Punk77 Posted August 11, 2011 Share Posted August 11, 2011 What's the point of resting Ba against Wigan? You don't see Man Utd resting Rooney against them. It's not a friendly. That's exactly what SAF is NOT doing..He's resting players when they're up against the weakest teams..Eg. Rooney. The same principle has his trainee, Solskjær, done in Molde..And Solskjær is very good at displaying trust towards his players..When he's asked questions like "you're fielding a weakened team today" he's responding that he got full confidence in the replacements..They will do the job..That of course make the squad players buckle up and run like idiots..A couple of Molde's players have taken huge steps this seasons.. That's not how I remember it. And ffs, you can't compare the Norwegian league to Premier League. In your philosophy, we should rest pretty much the whole XI, and send out our garbage subs? Yes, most of them will probably run like idiots, but that doesn't help much does it. Furthermore, assuming Newcastle finishes top 12, we should rest the likes of Ba and let's say Tiote against the 8 other teams? Jesus christ man. Go fish. Read my posts ffs..I'm not talking about resting the whole team, on or two players..maximum Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
dcmk Posted August 11, 2011 Share Posted August 11, 2011 What's the point of resting Ba against Wigan? You don't see Man Utd resting Rooney against them. It's not a friendly. That's exactly what SAF is NOT doing..He's resting players when they're up against the weakest teams..Eg. Rooney. The same principle has his trainee, Solskjær, done in Molde..And Solskjær is very good at displaying trust towards his players..When he's asked questions like "you're fielding a weakened team today" he's responding that he got full confidence in the replacements..They will do the job..That of course make the squad players buckle up and run like idiots..A couple of Molde's players have taken huge steps this seasons because Solskjær's approach..which he got from SAF. So your saying we have adequete replacements against the Wigans of this world when we could be possibly be in a relegation battle next season You're still not getting it....We need another striker, that's obvious..But we also have a extremely good midfield that enables us to use a 4-5-1 formation..So relax..All I'm saying is that we should ROTATE players sometimes to avoid injuries.That enables us to field our best team against the best opponents Stop with this nonsense. Please. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
eliassenfredrik Posted August 11, 2011 Share Posted August 11, 2011 What's the point of resting Ba against Wigan? You don't see Man Utd resting Rooney against them. It's not a friendly. That's exactly what SAF is NOT doing..He's resting players when they're up against the weakest teams..Eg. Rooney. The same principle has his trainee, Solskjær, done in Molde..And Solskjær is very good at displaying trust towards his players..When he's asked questions like "you're fielding a weakened team today" he's responding that he got full confidence in the replacements..They will do the job..That of course make the squad players buckle up and run like idiots..A couple of Molde's players have taken huge steps this seasons.. That's not how I remember it. And ffs, you can't compare the Norwegian league to Premier League. In your philosophy, we should rest pretty much the whole XI, and send out our garbage subs? Yes, most of them will probably run like idiots, but that doesn't help much does it. Furthermore, assuming Newcastle finishes top 12, we should rest the likes of Ba and let's say Tiote against the 8 other teams? Jesus christ man. Go fish. Read my posts ffs..I'm not talking about resting the whole team, on or two players..maximum I most certainly have, and it makes no sense. We're not Barcelona. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now