Dave Posted October 26, 2009 Share Posted October 26, 2009 Ashley finally rejects Moat bid. FUCK OFF FAT CUNT! http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/football/leagues/championship/newcastleunited/6441243/Mike-Ashley-rejects-Barry-Moats-80-million-offer-for-Newcastle.html I thought he said last week it was £80m up front, end of story. No 60-20 split was mentioned was it? He did. Nothing story tbh. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
madras Posted October 26, 2009 Share Posted October 26, 2009 The £20m he's "short" matches nicely with the £20m NUST have pledges of ready to go. pledges ready to go is different to cash in the back. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
EthiGeordie Posted October 26, 2009 Share Posted October 26, 2009 WTF he knows we hate him and he wants to harm us in a hard way. As long us Moat is eager to compelete this thing we can still see the light at the end of the tunnel.... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pilko Posted October 26, 2009 Share Posted October 26, 2009 This changes nothing, really. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JH Posted October 26, 2009 Share Posted October 26, 2009 I think Ashley made the right decision. I reckon he should keep a hold of the club, he's doing a decent job atm Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Geordiekev Posted October 26, 2009 Share Posted October 26, 2009 The fat bastards a plastic flower.......................... Not for fucking real.. I think Ashley made the right decision. I reckon he should keep a hold of the club, he's doing a decent job atm You my friend are an idiot.. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jdckelly Posted October 26, 2009 Share Posted October 26, 2009 this seems to be a case of whos trying to screw who, ashley is desperate to get out everyone knows that and theres no other interest in the club moat knows that too so is trying to get as good a deal as possible however ashley doesn't want to get mugged so to speak despite his desire to get out and wants it all up front, possibly to weaken moats position for the rest of the season even if it costs him personally 20m if moat says enoughs enough and walks away and thats what ashley has to pay to keep the club going Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Wally_McFool Posted October 26, 2009 Share Posted October 26, 2009 I think Ashley made the right decision. I reckon he should keep a hold of the club, he's doing a decent job atm Sack the Global Moderator. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Redheugh Posted October 26, 2009 Share Posted October 26, 2009 Why did he not accept the 100M offer Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jdckelly Posted October 26, 2009 Share Posted October 26, 2009 I think Ashley made the right decision. I reckon he should keep a hold of the club, he's doing a decent job atm Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JH Posted October 26, 2009 Share Posted October 26, 2009 Well if Ashley's gonna take the piss, so am I Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
madras Posted October 26, 2009 Share Posted October 26, 2009 Why did he not accept the 100M offer was there a 100mill offer and was it straight down or in installments maybe with provisos. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JH Posted October 26, 2009 Share Posted October 26, 2009 Why did he not accept the 100M offer You see, the position that MA is in, he can only accept/reject actual offers, as oppose to ones made up by the people in your head Mr Sheard Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jdckelly Posted October 26, 2009 Share Posted October 26, 2009 Well if Ashley's gonna take the piss, so am I do not ever ever ever type those words again Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Geordie Posted October 26, 2009 Share Posted October 26, 2009 If the Telegraph is to be believed, then Ashley is playing hardball with Moat. I remain unconvinced, however. At the risk of repeating myself for the n'th time, for a man who is desperate to get shot of us (by all accounts), he's not half hanging on for dear life. C**t. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Redheugh Posted October 26, 2009 Share Posted October 26, 2009 At the risk of repeating myself.............. Balls to it Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jdckelly Posted October 26, 2009 Share Posted October 26, 2009 If the Telegraph is to be believed, then Ashley is playing hardball with Moat. I remain unconvinced, however. At the risk of repeating myself for the n'th time, for a man who is desperate to get shot of us (by all accounts), he's not half hanging on for dear life. C**t. well this is what i think, he doesnt want to be screwed over as he thinks he's being by moat, he wants to walk on his terms not someone elses Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
1878 Posted October 26, 2009 Share Posted October 26, 2009 If this Moat fella is struggling to even raise enough to buy the shares then why would you want him in charge? He'll have nothing to invest surely Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted October 26, 2009 Share Posted October 26, 2009 Not again. http://www.newcastle-online.org/nufcforum/index.php/topic,64911.0.html Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cronky Posted October 26, 2009 Share Posted October 26, 2009 If this Moat fella is struggling to even raise enough to buy the shares then why would you want him in charge? He'll have nothing to invest surely Unfortunately, getting rid of Mike Ashley has become an end in itself. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jdckelly Posted October 26, 2009 Share Posted October 26, 2009 If this Moat fella is struggling to even raise enough to buy the shares then why would you want him in charge? He'll have nothing to invest surely someone who isn't a complete tool at board level is a welcome change Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JH Posted October 26, 2009 Share Posted October 26, 2009 Shepherd had no money, and he spent shitloads. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
indi Posted October 26, 2009 Share Posted October 26, 2009 Shepherd had no money, and he spent shitloads. Hmmm... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jdckelly Posted October 26, 2009 Share Posted October 26, 2009 Shepherd had no money, and he spent shitloads. that wasn't a good thing as he spent money that the club didn't have either Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JH Posted October 26, 2009 Share Posted October 26, 2009 Shepherd had no money, and he spent shitloads. that wasn't a good thing as he spent money that the club didn't have either Aye, but before he took it to the extremes in the last few years, in the early Bobby days money was not really an issue most seasons Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts