jdckelly Posted October 11, 2010 Share Posted October 11, 2010 Rbs win court injunction to stop h&g sacking the board...guess that's the start of pools luck changing... only an interim judgement ahead of the court case tomorrow Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted October 11, 2010 Share Posted October 11, 2010 Rbs win court injunction to stop h&g sacking the board...guess that's the start of pools luck changing... Sale will go through now. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest neesy111 Posted October 11, 2010 Share Posted October 11, 2010 BBC Reporting new asian bid has came in, hmmm. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest ObiChrisKenobi Posted October 11, 2010 Share Posted October 11, 2010 Can't H&G do anything right! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ElDiablo Posted October 11, 2010 Share Posted October 11, 2010 Barry Moat in a turban. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cronky Posted October 11, 2010 Share Posted October 11, 2010 BBC Reporting new asian bid has came in, hmmm. I'd have thought any new bid that's larger than the existing one will create a problem for the Board. It'll be difficult to argue that the sale price is 'reasonable' if there's an opportunity to sell it for more. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dokko Posted October 11, 2010 Share Posted October 11, 2010 New bid more than old bid, meaning old bid could be deemed as unacceptable. Perfect timing. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jdckelly Posted October 11, 2010 Share Posted October 11, 2010 New bid more than old bid, meaning old bid could be deemed as unacceptable. Perfect timing. sky sports and other football news guys must be thanking this liverpool saga, good way to fill time/pages during international break Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dokko Posted October 11, 2010 Share Posted October 11, 2010 New bid more than old bid, meaning old bid could be deemed as unacceptable. Perfect timing. sky sports and other football news guys must be thanking this liverpool saga, good way to fill time/pages during international break Good news is no news. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
summerof69 Posted October 11, 2010 Share Posted October 11, 2010 New bid more than old bid, meaning old bid could be deemed as unacceptable. Perfect timing. sky sports and other football news guys must be thanking this liverpool saga, good way to fill time/pages during international break I am just glad it isn't us. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Chris P Posted October 11, 2010 Share Posted October 11, 2010 New bid more than old bid, meaning old bid could be deemed as unacceptable. Perfect timing. sky sports and other football news guys must be thanking this liverpool saga, good way to fill time/pages during international break Or has it been planned this way, Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dokko Posted October 11, 2010 Share Posted October 11, 2010 New bid more than old bid, meaning old bid could be deemed as unacceptable. Perfect timing. sky sports and other football news guys must be thanking this liverpool saga, good way to fill time/pages during international break Or has it been planned this way, P = Parky? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Exiled in Texas Posted October 11, 2010 Share Posted October 11, 2010 NESV you are our saviours!! We love you. Wait, hang on. Better bid elsewhere? NESV **** off we never liked you anyway.......Mr Lim, you are our saviour! We Love you!! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dokko Posted October 11, 2010 Share Posted October 11, 2010 NESV you are our saviours!! We love you. Wait, hang on. Better bid elsewhere? NESV **** off we never liked you anyway.......Mr Lim, you are our saviour! We Love you!! Like that Simpson newsreader. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest ObiChrisKenobi Posted October 11, 2010 Share Posted October 11, 2010 http://t3.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcSh_89-OffG3o8-RoddVGnS_xPw91BDNkiPA9MM8PYPUZhcKQA&t=1&usg=__KoZBrm4g5YKC50EiSV4mVxHMslM= Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest gggg Posted October 12, 2010 Share Posted October 12, 2010 Hicks offers no defence. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest gggg Posted October 12, 2010 Share Posted October 12, 2010 From Twitter RobHarrisUK RBS accuses hicks and gillett in court of "breathtaking arrogance" in obstructing sale process 11.33am: "RBS appeal to judge to 'restore a clearly constituted and functioning board' today. 'It cannot wait and it would be wrong for Mr Hicks and Gillett to profit from their tactics.'," reports Sachin Nakrani. 11.38am: Hicks and Gillett representative admits to breach of contract but feels there is no urge for board to be reconstituted before Friday. RBS dismisses this as 'absurd' given the company needs to repay £200m to the bank by Friday. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest neesy111 Posted October 12, 2010 Share Posted October 12, 2010 Going to be a few bad months for Hicks as his NHL franchise was forced into adminstration as well recently Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest gggg Posted October 12, 2010 Share Posted October 12, 2010 H&G QC says case should be heard next week - "no rush". Snowdon QC says that is "frankly. absurd" Sounds like admin is what he wants. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted October 12, 2010 Share Posted October 12, 2010 I can't understand why Hicks and Gilette want to stall the sale to the point at which Liverpool go into administration. They'll attract even less money if the club is on -3 points and bottom of the league. Either they have a deal lined up that only they know about that gives them a better price (which seems unlikely when there's no reason Liverpool couldn't just accept that bid instead) or they are willing to see the club burn and accept an even greater loss just to do so. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jdckelly Posted October 12, 2010 Share Posted October 12, 2010 I can't understand why Hicks and Gilette want to stall the sale to the point at which Liverpool go into administration. They'll attract even less money if the club is on -3 points and bottom of the league. Either they have a deal lined up that only they know about that gives them a better price (which seems unlikely when there's no reason Liverpool couldn't just accept that bid instead) or they are willing to see the club burn and accept an even greater loss just to do so. this Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jdckelly Posted October 12, 2010 Share Posted October 12, 2010 anyway peter lim has offered 320m in cash for the club with 40m to spend in jan, kinda ruins any potential argument by rbs etc that the nesv offer is the only game in town Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest ObiChrisKenobi Posted October 12, 2010 Share Posted October 12, 2010 http://www.guardian.co.uk/football/blog/2010/oct/12/liverpool-fc-rbs-hicks-gillett-john-w-henry Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted October 12, 2010 Share Posted October 12, 2010 I can't understand why Hicks and Gilette want to stall the sale to the point at which Liverpool go into administration. They'll attract even less money if the club is on -3 points and bottom of the league. Either they have a deal lined up that only they know about that gives them a better price (which seems unlikely when there's no reason Liverpool couldn't just accept that bid instead) or they are willing to see the club burn and accept an even greater loss just to do so. this So they'd each pay £70m+ just to see Liverpool on negative points? I know many on here don't like the club all that much - and I'm the same - but come on. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jdckelly Posted October 12, 2010 Share Posted October 12, 2010 I can't understand why Hicks and Gilette want to stall the sale to the point at which Liverpool go into administration. They'll attract even less money if the club is on -3 points and bottom of the league. Either they have a deal lined up that only they know about that gives them a better price (which seems unlikely when there's no reason Liverpool couldn't just accept that bid instead) or they are willing to see the club burn and accept an even greater loss just to do so. this So they'd each pay £70m+ just to see Liverpool on negative points? I know many on here don't like the club all that much - and I'm the same - but come on. its the only semi-logical explanation I can think of Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now