jdckelly Posted October 12, 2010 Share Posted October 12, 2010 a legally binding sale agreement has been signed by broughton and nesv so the new bid is irrelevant if broughton wins what the case is about is did broughton and the board have the power to do so and had they invalidated the agreement between rbs and hicks Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest neesy111 Posted October 12, 2010 Share Posted October 12, 2010 After hearing the case, I honestly think all parties in this are lying to each other. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JH Posted October 12, 2010 Share Posted October 12, 2010 4.04pm: Judge says it would be a "little ambitious" for the case to be settled by Friday. (In reply to Broughton's QC saying board would desperately like a verdict by then). 4.48pm: JUDGEMENT ON THE CASE IS TO BE GIVEN AT 10.30AM TOMORROW (WEDNESDAY) MORNING The has been the most uncertain of court cases ever. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Colos Short and Curlies Posted October 12, 2010 Share Posted October 12, 2010 Does anyone know if the Spirit of Shankley managed to get their protest group down to London today? When I heard the chap on the radio saying he wanted protests to happen I could only think of that Harry Enfield sketch where the three scallies go down to that there London (On a tenuously related point, on a course at the moment which is being delivered by someone who is exactly what you would get if George Dawes ever played Pepe Reina, its uncanny) Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest neesy111 Posted October 12, 2010 Share Posted October 12, 2010 Even pompey had a few fans when they in the High Court. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jdckelly Posted October 12, 2010 Share Posted October 12, 2010 Does anyone know if the Spirit of Shankley managed to get their protest group down to London today? When I heard the chap on the radio saying he wanted protests to happen I could only think of that Harry Enfield sketch where the three scallies go down to that there London (On a tenuously related point, on a course at the moment which is being delivered by someone who is exactly what you would get if George Dawes ever played Pepe Reina, its uncanny) some few (30 or so i think) outside and 3 inside the court (tbf only 30 seats in the gallery and most of that was taken up by journos) Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Exiled in Texas Posted October 12, 2010 Share Posted October 12, 2010 Going to be a few bad months for Hicks as his NHL franchise was forced into adminstration as well recently Actually not quite true - the Dallas Stars bankruptcy protections expired on September 1st this year, but there are no plans to force the team into full bankruptcy. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest ObiChrisKenobi Posted October 13, 2010 Share Posted October 13, 2010 In favour of RBS, the club can be sold to NESV. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
NG32 Posted October 13, 2010 Share Posted October 13, 2010 We all knew it ! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
wacko Posted October 13, 2010 Share Posted October 13, 2010 Judge finds in favour of RBS. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
NG32 Posted October 13, 2010 Share Posted October 13, 2010 Parkinoid 3 - Liverpool 2? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Village Idiot Posted October 13, 2010 Share Posted October 13, 2010 Parkinoid 3 - Liverpool 2? High scoring game compared to the previous one, one can notice Benítez is off. Good news for Liverpool I suppose, are they going to get points docked? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted October 13, 2010 Share Posted October 13, 2010 Things will end rosily for them anyway, madness to think otherwise. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
NG32 Posted October 13, 2010 Share Posted October 13, 2010 Parkinoid 3 - Liverpool 2? High scoring game compared to the previous one, one can notice Benítez is off. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nicky Posted October 13, 2010 Share Posted October 13, 2010 Talksport reckon H&G are not being given the right to appeal, either. Shame. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest neesy111 Posted October 13, 2010 Share Posted October 13, 2010 Typical Fucking Lucky Scousers. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Optimistic Nut Posted October 13, 2010 Share Posted October 13, 2010 Does this alter the fact they face administration on Friday though? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ikri Posted October 13, 2010 Share Posted October 13, 2010 Not sure whether we have any similar law to the US law that a company board must do everything possible to maximise shareholder profit else H&G would have a good case against the other board members if they have indeed ignored other, higher, bids in favour of this one. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest neesy111 Posted October 13, 2010 Share Posted October 13, 2010 Does this alter the fact they face administration on Friday though? It means they won't be going into Admin as RBS can recover their debts via the sale. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Optimistic Nut Posted October 13, 2010 Share Posted October 13, 2010 Fucking scum. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
khay Posted October 13, 2010 Share Posted October 13, 2010 Not sure whether we have any similar law to the US law that a company board must do everything possible to maximise shareholder profit else H&G would have a good case against the other board members if they have indeed ignored other, higher, bids in favour of this one. Did they not say that the better offer came after they had agreed to sell though? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ikri Posted October 13, 2010 Share Posted October 13, 2010 Not sure whether we have any similar law to the US law that a company board must do everything possible to maximise shareholder profit else H&G would have a good case against the other board members if they have indeed ignored other, higher, bids in favour of this one. Did they not say that the better offer came after they had agreed to sell though? Don't think it would matter if they weren't willing to consider the other offer(s). Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest neesy111 Posted October 13, 2010 Share Posted October 13, 2010 Liverpool won't be going into Admin. Though whoever thinks £300M is a good price for them should have their heads chopped off, as they need to finance their new stadium at £350M. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest gggg Posted October 13, 2010 Share Posted October 13, 2010 There's no need whatsoever for them to go into admin. They have a buyer and aren't insolvent, RBS have their money. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
khay Posted October 13, 2010 Share Posted October 13, 2010 Not sure whether we have any similar law to the US law that a company board must do everything possible to maximise shareholder profit else H&G would have a good case against the other board members if they have indeed ignored other, higher, bids in favour of this one. Did they not say that the better offer came after they had agreed to sell though? Don't think it would matter if they weren't willing to consider the other offer(s). That's what I'm saying they had agreed to sell hence listened to offers agreed on someone and then this new bid came in afterwards. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now