Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Kevin Phillips is a fucking idiot, how on earth is that a penalty when he fouled him outside the box?

 

Is he Sky's co-commentator? Would've thought he'd be denying the penalty even if Mensah had turned a bazooka the way of Suarez.

 

 

Ratboy's contradicted himself 2 or 3 times over the penalty.

Link to post
Share on other sites

That was hard to call, the first foot took him from behind outside the box, however the foot that took him down was inside the box, either way it should have been a red card, he was taking away a goal scoring opportunity.

 

Wasn't last man, Bramble was covering.

 

Although I'm not exactly sure what constitutes a goalscoring opportunity. Anyone fouling Messi 30 yards from goal should be sent off. ;)

I never said he was the last man, but had the challenge not have been made he would have been in the box with quite possibly a one on one, from the angle he was at and the position of the goal keeper I would have backed him to score.
Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest toonlass

I would say the Stadium of Filth sounds like a library but that would imply the Mackem counts could read. Fucking shite atmosphere.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Liverpool set pieces involving Carroll now just look like what we had. Clueless commentators saying they have never seen such a tactic before.

 

They really said that ? :lol:

 

"Interesting", "Never seen this before".

 

:facepalm:

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't see why the decision is so controversial. The tackle was right on the edge of the box. On the line = inside IIRC.

 

I've only seen it once but it was about two foot outside the box wasn't it?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Spark

I don't see why the decision is so controversial. The tackle was right on the edge of the box. On the line = inside IIRC.

 

I've only seen it once but it was about two foot outside the box wasn't it?

 

It was actually his trailing leg that brought him down imo and that was on the line as far as I can tell.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't see why the decision is so controversial. The tackle was right on the edge of the box. On the line = inside IIRC.

 

I've only seen it once but it was about two foot outside the box wasn't it?

 

It was actually his trailing leg that brought him down imo and that was on the line as far as I can tell.

 

Ah, didn't notice that.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...