mrmojorisin75 Posted September 18, 2013 Share Posted September 18, 2013 just ignored the majority of that then i see Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ronaldo Posted September 18, 2013 Share Posted September 18, 2013 It's garbage, tbh. Trying to dissect Cheick Tiote as a footballer is as pointless as offering an objective critique of Gary Glitter's sexual performance. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiresias Posted September 18, 2013 Share Posted September 18, 2013 It's garbage, tbh. Trying to dissect Cheick Tiote as a footballer is as pointless as offering an objective critique of Gary Glitter's sexual performance. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted September 18, 2013 Share Posted September 18, 2013 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mrmojorisin75 Posted September 18, 2013 Share Posted September 18, 2013 It's garbage, tbh. Trying to dissect Cheick Tiote as a footballer is as pointless as offering an objective critique of Gary Glitter's sexual performance. ronaldo backs up flimsy opinion with nothing shocker Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AyeDubbleYoo Posted September 18, 2013 Share Posted September 18, 2013 I don't know if Gary Glitter's main problem is that he's not good at sex, I don't have any evidence for that. I thought the issue was that he likes kids. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mrmojorisin75 Posted September 18, 2013 Share Posted September 18, 2013 he got that wrong too then Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shearergol Posted September 18, 2013 Share Posted September 18, 2013 I don't know if Gary Glitter's main problem is that he's not good at sex, I don't have any evidence for that. I thought the issue was that he likes kids. Ball control. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ronaldo Posted September 18, 2013 Share Posted September 18, 2013 It's garbage, tbh. Trying to dissect Cheick Tiote as a footballer is as pointless as offering an objective critique of Gary Glitter's sexual performance. ronaldo backs up flimsy opinion with nothing shocker Flimsy opinion. 90% of the forum and pretty much every PL manager have Tiote's weaknesses sussed. If you wanna carry on being silly or pretending to be silly, fine. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mrmojorisin75 Posted September 18, 2013 Share Posted September 18, 2013 It's garbage, tbh. Trying to dissect Cheick Tiote as a footballer is as pointless as offering an objective critique of Gary Glitter's sexual performance. ronaldo backs up flimsy opinion with nothing shocker Flimsy opinion. 90% of the forum and pretty much every PL manager has Tiote's weaknesses sussed. If you wanna carry on being silly or pretending to be silly, fine. 2 points: agree his weaknesses were exposed and exploited for the last year or more he's played in the most static team in the PL imo, as a team we've been constantly on the back foot and under pressure hence all the long balls and almost getting relegated i don't see these things in isolation, the second enhanced the first to the point where he barely looked a footballer anymore, i agree, but he showed on saturday that if he has options for a short pass (which it looks like he now has) he can still win the ball and play it simple no-one is saying he'll be a world beater again but don't tell me he can't make a passable PL DM 'cause that's horseshit...i'm not saying tmonkeys entire post was right but the last sentence or so is spot on, there is absolutely no reason he can't emulate the anita role albeit with a more defensive focus Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ronaldo Posted September 18, 2013 Share Posted September 18, 2013 Anita, as much as I'm not his biggest fan, is in another world when it comes to receiving, retaining and distributing the ball at the right time in the right place. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mrmojorisin75 Posted September 18, 2013 Share Posted September 18, 2013 Anita, as much as I'm not his biggest fan, is in another world when it comes to receiving, retaining and distributing the ball at the right time in the right place. so that doesn't make tiote a footballer? which is what you've said bollocks Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ronaldo Posted September 18, 2013 Share Posted September 18, 2013 Anita, as much as I'm not his biggest fan, is in another world when it comes to receiving, retaining and distributing the ball at the right time in the right place. so that doesn't make tiote a footballer? which is what you've said bollocks He's a defensive midfielder who can't be trusted to retain or distribute the ball. What's his purpose? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Super Duper Branko Strupar Posted September 18, 2013 Share Posted September 18, 2013 Wow. This is a totally new conversation. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mrmojorisin75 Posted September 18, 2013 Share Posted September 18, 2013 Anita, as much as I'm not his biggest fan, is in another world when it comes to receiving, retaining and distributing the ball at the right time in the right place. so that doesn't make tiote a footballer? which is what you've said bollocks He's a defensive midfielder who can't be trusted to retain or distribute the ball. What's his purpose? just because you keep saying things doesn't make them indisputable facts as much as you'd like it to be the case tiote was shit under pressure when the team was terrible and there was no-one, literally no-one showing for the ball...things have changed, i disagree completely that tiote is incapable of retaining possession as long as people around him are showing for the ball and our general play continues to put the other team on the back foot rather than inviting them onto us like we saw last year Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ronaldo Posted September 18, 2013 Share Posted September 18, 2013 He was doing it 4 weeks ago. Things have changed. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mrmojorisin75 Posted September 18, 2013 Share Posted September 18, 2013 He was doing it 4 weeks ago. Things have changed. you're wrong man, face it, happens sometimes Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ronaldo Posted September 18, 2013 Share Posted September 18, 2013 Aye. Me and every PL manager who tells his players to target him. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mrmojorisin75 Posted September 18, 2013 Share Posted September 18, 2013 righto man, lambert made a right cunt of the plan on saturday didn't he? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ronaldo Posted September 18, 2013 Share Posted September 18, 2013 No, because fortunately even Pardew has more sense than to start him these days. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mrmojorisin75 Posted September 18, 2013 Share Posted September 18, 2013 No, because fortunately even Pardew has more sense than to start him these days. You know exactly what I mean. Goal in it, Tiote on for what 20 mins? Don't remember losing that game tbf. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ronaldo Posted September 18, 2013 Share Posted September 18, 2013 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
David Icke - Son of God Posted September 18, 2013 Share Posted September 18, 2013 Tiote's been turboshit for 18 months unfortunately. He keeps hold of the ball too long, he tries to do too much and more often than not when he does pass he puts other players under pressure because he doesn't get his head up and look for a man in space. He's tackling isn't even that much of an asset these days because he's too easily drawn into battles with particular players and just gives away a fuckload of freekicks. Anita's not as physical, but his workrate and the pressure he puts players under means we don't need to have Tiote chucking himself into 50/50s challenges to win the ball back. No brainer for me, like. Anita every day of the week. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest neesy111 Posted September 18, 2013 Share Posted September 18, 2013 Tiote's been turboshit for 18 months unfortunately. He keeps hold of the ball too long, he tries to do too much and more often than not when he does pass he puts other players under pressure because he doesn't get his head up and look for a man in space. He's tackling isn't even that much of an asset these days because he's too easily drawn into battles with particular players and just gives away a fuckload of freekicks. Anita's not as physical, but his workrate and the pressure he puts players under means we don't need to have Tiote chucking himself into 50/50s challenges to win the ball back. No brainer for me, like. Anita every day of the week. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AyeDubbleYoo Posted September 18, 2013 Share Posted September 18, 2013 Clearly Anita is the best option, but I don't think Tiote is a write-off. In the right situations, and if he recovers a bit of form, he's a useful player. He's not terrible, he just needs to sharpen up. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now