Mr. Snrub Posted December 15, 2010 Share Posted December 15, 2010 Roobie Keane is still only 30 ffs and with the exception of Carroll, infinitely better than any of our other strikers. He'd be a very good signing for us, him and AC could be a great strike pairing. So was Michael Owen two days ago. Keane isn't made of glass though and he isn't a mercenary c***. Wolves, Coventry, Inter, Leeds, Spurs, Liverpool & Celtic Moved up to PL with Coventry, dream move to Inter, fell out of favour and went back to England, Leeds fucked so went to Spurs. Liverpool and Celtic boyhood clubs. Not one transfer where you can say he went for the money. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JH Posted December 15, 2010 Share Posted December 15, 2010 Hang on, Keane played for Inter Milan? When the fuck did this happen? That's brilliant Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Foluwashola Posted December 15, 2010 Share Posted December 15, 2010 He's had more boyhood clubs than wanks. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kaizero Posted December 15, 2010 Share Posted December 15, 2010 I'm sure if he came here we'd be a boyhood club of his as well. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted December 15, 2010 Share Posted December 15, 2010 On a loan would be good, nothing to worry about. On a transfer would be very silly. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Village Idiot Posted December 15, 2010 Share Posted December 15, 2010 Judging by previous signings in pretty recent times we should not bother signing Keane types. On loan it is a win win though and I don't think Ashley is going to fund the signing of a good youngish striker which would cost 5m+ surely. Doesn't even matter though because according to them we are on our way to becoming the barca model! Good times. Funniest thing, all of our current crop of homegrown wonders were scouted/signed under a board that ended up being chased out of town (and rightly so). Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted December 15, 2010 Share Posted December 15, 2010 Hang on, Keane played for Inter Milan? When the fuck did this happen? That's brilliant You must be joking. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Heneage Posted December 15, 2010 Share Posted December 15, 2010 Hang on, Keane played for Inter Milan? When the f*** did this happen? That's brilliant It was unfortunate for him. The manager who rated him was sacked early on and he was instantly deemed not good enough by his replacement. http://img.thesun.co.uk/multimedia/archive/00528/inter_350x475_528696a.jpg Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JH Posted December 15, 2010 Share Posted December 15, 2010 Hang on, Keane played for Inter Milan? When the f*** did this happen? That's brilliant You must be joking. Nope Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ponsaelius Posted December 15, 2010 Share Posted December 15, 2010 Whey aye then, lets just spend more money than we've got on Keane, give him the long term deal on big money he will demand and go round the same cycle over again. Be great watching another 30+ player half-heartedly play out their twilight years while picking up easy money, we've had nowhere near enough of them scenarios before Ludicrous that people think it's sensible signing Keane permanently, or at all realistic. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JH Posted December 15, 2010 Share Posted December 15, 2010 Just googled it. Howay man Dave, I was only 10 at the time Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shayno Posted December 15, 2010 Share Posted December 15, 2010 They paid 12 mill, possibly more if any clauses were acted upon, only two years ago. Surely they wouldn't accept a bid any less than half that at 6 mill which is being very optimistic. That money could be waaaay better spent elsewhere. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JH Posted December 15, 2010 Share Posted December 15, 2010 Whey aye then, lets just spend more money than we've got on Keane, give him the long term deal on big money he will demand and go round the same cycle over again. Be great watching another 30+ player half-heartedly play out their twilight years while picking up easy money, we've had nowhere near enough of them scenarios before Ludicrous that people think it's sensible signing Keane permanently, or at all realistic. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ponsaelius Posted December 15, 2010 Share Posted December 15, 2010 Let's all do the little eyes thing Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kaizero Posted December 15, 2010 Share Posted December 15, 2010 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Prophet Posted December 15, 2010 Share Posted December 15, 2010 Whey aye then, lets just spend more money than we've got on Keane, give him the long term deal on big money he will demand and go round the same cycle over again. Be great watching another 30+ player half-heartedly play out their twilight years while picking up easy money, we've had nowhere near enough of them scenarios before Ludicrous that people think it's sensible signing Keane permanently, or at all realistic. Is anyone actually suggesting this? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted December 15, 2010 Share Posted December 15, 2010 Let's all do the little eyes thing You started it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JH Posted December 15, 2010 Share Posted December 15, 2010 Whey aye then, lets just spend more money than we've got on Keane, give him the long term deal on big money he will demand and go round the same cycle over again. Be great watching another 30+ player half-heartedly play out their twilight years while picking up easy money, we've had nowhere near enough of them scenarios before Ludicrous that people think it's sensible signing Keane permanently, or at all realistic. Is anyone actually suggesting this? Can't see anyone suggesting it, nope. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ponsaelius Posted December 15, 2010 Share Posted December 15, 2010 Whey aye then, lets just spend more money than we've got on Keane, give him the long term deal on big money he will demand and go round the same cycle over again. Be great watching another 30+ player half-heartedly play out their twilight years while picking up easy money, we've had nowhere near enough of them scenarios before Ludicrous that people think it's sensible signing Keane permanently, or at all realistic. Is anyone actually suggesting this? Well people are suggesting we should sign him permanently, so by deduction, yes they are. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JH Posted December 15, 2010 Share Posted December 15, 2010 Whey aye then, lets just spend more money than we've got on Keane, give him the long term deal on big money he will demand and go round the same cycle over again. Be great watching another 30+ player half-heartedly play out their twilight years while picking up easy money, we've had nowhere near enough of them scenarios before Ludicrous that people think it's sensible signing Keane permanently, or at all realistic. Is anyone actually suggesting this? Well people are suggesting we should sign him permanently, so by deduction, yes they are. As far as I can see, people are saying we should sign him because of his playing ability. Nobody even mentions wages/fees. If they want too much money or he wants high wages/long contract, then no it probably won't happen. Doesn't mean I don't want him here. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ponsaelius Posted December 15, 2010 Share Posted December 15, 2010 Whey aye then, lets just spend more money than we've got on Keane, give him the long term deal on big money he will demand and go round the same cycle over again. Be great watching another 30+ player half-heartedly play out their twilight years while picking up easy money, we've had nowhere near enough of them scenarios before Ludicrous that people think it's sensible signing Keane permanently, or at all realistic. Is anyone actually suggesting this? Well people are suggesting we should sign him permanently, so by deduction, yes they are. As far as I can see, people are saying we should sign him because of his playing ability. Nobody even mentions wages/fees. If they want too much money or he wants high wages/long contract, then no it probably won't happen. Doesn't mean I don't want him here. What we gonna do, send them some stray change and pay him in Guinness? Of course the fee/wage would be ludicrous man, this is Spurs. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TRC Posted December 15, 2010 Share Posted December 15, 2010 A few years ago people were sick of signing late 28-30 year olds who were past it and on huge wages and wanted us to sign some younger, cheaper players. Now you want Robbie Keane who hasn't performed to a Premiership standard for over 2 years. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shayno Posted December 15, 2010 Share Posted December 15, 2010 Whey aye then, lets just spend more money than we've got on Keane, give him the long term deal on big money he will demand and go round the same cycle over again. Be great watching another 30+ player half-heartedly play out their twilight years while picking up easy money, we've had nowhere near enough of them scenarios before Ludicrous that people think it's sensible signing Keane permanently, or at all realistic. Is anyone actually suggesting this? Well people are suggesting we should sign him permanently, so by deduction, yes they are. As far as I can see, people are saying we should sign him because of his playing ability. Nobody even mentions wages/fees. If they want too much money or he wants high wages/long contract, then no it probably won't happen. Doesn't mean I don't want him here. Posters should be criticised if they make statements like "lets sign Keane" without thinking about the consequences. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Prophet Posted December 15, 2010 Share Posted December 15, 2010 Whey aye then, lets just spend more money than we've got on Keane, give him the long term deal on big money he will demand and go round the same cycle over again. Be great watching another 30+ player half-heartedly play out their twilight years while picking up easy money, we've had nowhere near enough of them scenarios before Ludicrous that people think it's sensible signing Keane permanently, or at all realistic. Is anyone actually suggesting this? Well people are suggesting we should sign him permanently, so by deduction, yes they are. As far as I can see, people are saying we should sign him because of his playing ability. Nobody even mentions wages/fees. If they want too much money or he wants high wages/long contract, then no it probably won't happen. Doesn't mean I don't want him here. What we gonna do, send them some stray change and pay him in Guinness? Of course the fee/wage would be ludicrous man, this is Spurs. I think what most are trying to say is that if he's available at the right price he'd be an improvement on the options we currently have. Ashley has shown over the last coule of seasons he isn't going to be throwing ludicrous amounts of money about, we've been signing relatively young players for a knockdown fees, I can't see him suddenly changing that policy for Pardew. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JH Posted December 15, 2010 Share Posted December 15, 2010 Whey aye then, lets just spend more money than we've got on Keane, give him the long term deal on big money he will demand and go round the same cycle over again. Be great watching another 30+ player half-heartedly play out their twilight years while picking up easy money, we've had nowhere near enough of them scenarios before Ludicrous that people think it's sensible signing Keane permanently, or at all realistic. Is anyone actually suggesting this? Well people are suggesting we should sign him permanently, so by deduction, yes they are. As far as I can see, people are saying we should sign him because of his playing ability. Nobody even mentions wages/fees. If they want too much money or he wants high wages/long contract, then no it probably won't happen. Doesn't mean I don't want him here. Posters should be criticised if they make statements like "lets sign Keane" without thinking about the consequences. It be a pretty fucking boring forum if we had to do maths and work out the finances of a transfer every time we suggested a fucking signing like. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now