Andy Posted October 27, 2010 Share Posted October 27, 2010 So fucking annoying that when something is there for the taking (the presumption Arsenal starts with pretty much their kids) we don't go for it. Especially when Hughton fucking plays Carroll, Jonas and Barton for pretty much an entire half as well, so much for "saving" them for the weekend. Fuck right off. So much more annoying than just losing when you know it could have been won if we'd not went with our reserves. Most of the Arsenal kids are better than our first team. It'd not have ended 0-4 if say, Colo, Enrique, Jonas, Carroll, Tiote and Barton had started. I dare say we'd probably have won it against the players they started with if we'd gone for it. A similar line up beat Chelsea but I bet people would have been saying exactly the same if we lost that one. I don't mind having priorities, it was a risk throwing on Carroll, Barton and Jonas but maybe he cared a little more than he made out. I still would have gone for that line up (or similar), as defeatist as it is to some people the league is priority 1, 2 and 3 for me. The main issue was right back, why play our shittest player up against their best player (in the starting eleven)? If we'd have a player playing there with some sense of tactical nous and timing we could have seen a different match. Granted, hindsights 20/20, but regardless on if I'd agree with most of the players in the starting eleven I was fuming by the sight of Perch's name in it. Fuck Perch. It's the first player who plays for us that I genuinely have started to literally despise. He's just so fucking shit. Er, Perch didn't play at right back. At any point. Had a decent enough game, as well, considering the score. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
EthiGeordie Posted October 27, 2010 Share Posted October 27, 2010 I am really worried about our home form. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andy Posted October 27, 2010 Share Posted October 27, 2010 So fucking annoying that when something is there for the taking (the presumption Arsenal starts with pretty much their kids) we don't go for it. Especially when Hughton fucking plays Carroll, Jonas and Barton for pretty much an entire half as well, so much for "saving" them for the weekend. Fuck right off. So much more annoying than just losing when you know it could have been won if we'd not went with our reserves. Most of the Arsenal kids are better than our first team. It'd not have ended 0-4 if say, Colo, Enrique, Jonas, Carroll, Tiote and Barton had started. I dare say we'd probably have won it against the players they started with if we'd gone for it. A similar line up beat Chelsea but I bet people would have been saying exactly the same if we lost that one. I don't mind having priorities, it was a risk throwing on Carroll, Barton and Jonas but maybe he cared a little more than he made out. I still would have gone for that line up (or similar), as defeatist as it is to some people the league is priority 1, 2 and 3 for me. The main issue was right back, why play our shittest player up against their best player (in the starting eleven)? If we'd have a player playing there with some sense of tactical nous and timing we could have seen a different match. Granted, hindsights 20/20, but regardless on if I'd agree with most of the players in the starting eleven I was fuming by the sight of Perch's name in it. Fuck Perch. It's the first player who plays for us that I genuinely have started to literally despise. He's just so fucking shit. Er, Perch didn't play at right back. At any point. Left back, obviously. Perch played in the centre. Kadar was left back. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
broonalegeordie Posted October 27, 2010 Share Posted October 27, 2010 Krul 4 Raylor 4 Williamson 5 Perch 4.5 Kadar 5 Routledge 5 Smith 5 Guthrie 4 Vuckic 6 Ranger 7 Lovekrands 3 2.0 Jonas 6 Carroll 5.5 6.5 i agree mainly Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
MKSC Posted October 27, 2010 Share Posted October 27, 2010 I'm never happy to lose but we were in the game for a long while despite having a much weaker side out than them. It took a couple of spunky goals for them to get ahead and once they had a bit of daylight they were always going to hit us on the break. At least we have got through the game without injuries to any senior players and have re-confirmed that we have limited resources in reserve. Bring on Sunday and the filth from down the road. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JH Posted October 27, 2010 Share Posted October 27, 2010 Kaiz gets owned Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kaizero Posted October 27, 2010 Share Posted October 27, 2010 So fucking annoying that when something is there for the taking (the presumption Arsenal starts with pretty much their kids) we don't go for it. Especially when Hughton fucking plays Carroll, Jonas and Barton for pretty much an entire half as well, so much for "saving" them for the weekend. Fuck right off. So much more annoying than just losing when you know it could have been won if we'd not went with our reserves. Most of the Arsenal kids are better than our first team. It'd not have ended 0-4 if say, Colo, Enrique, Jonas, Carroll, Tiote and Barton had started. I dare say we'd probably have won it against the players they started with if we'd gone for it. A similar line up beat Chelsea but I bet people would have been saying exactly the same if we lost that one. I don't mind having priorities, it was a risk throwing on Carroll, Barton and Jonas but maybe he cared a little more than he made out. I still would have gone for that line up (or similar), as defeatist as it is to some people the league is priority 1, 2 and 3 for me. The main issue was right back, why play our shittest player up against their best player (in the starting eleven)? If we'd have a player playing there with some sense of tactical nous and timing we could have seen a different match. Granted, hindsights 20/20, but regardless on if I'd agree with most of the players in the starting eleven I was fuming by the sight of Perch's name in it. Fuck Perch. It's the first player who plays for us that I genuinely have started to literally despise. He's just so fucking shit. Er, Perch didn't play at right back. At any point. Left back, obviously. Perch played in the centre. Kadar was left back. Not according to the team sheet they showed on my telly. He was shit regardless. It angers me. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kaizero Posted October 27, 2010 Share Posted October 27, 2010 Kaiz gets owned Nah. No rage no lose. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TaylorJ_01 Posted October 27, 2010 Share Posted October 27, 2010 I'm sorry, bur again, did no one notice Smith getting booked TWICE?! Did that actually happen? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andy Posted October 27, 2010 Share Posted October 27, 2010 So fucking annoying that when something is there for the taking (the presumption Arsenal starts with pretty much their kids) we don't go for it. Especially when Hughton fucking plays Carroll, Jonas and Barton for pretty much an entire half as well, so much for "saving" them for the weekend. Fuck right off. So much more annoying than just losing when you know it could have been won if we'd not went with our reserves. Most of the Arsenal kids are better than our first team. It'd not have ended 0-4 if say, Colo, Enrique, Jonas, Carroll, Tiote and Barton had started. I dare say we'd probably have won it against the players they started with if we'd gone for it. A similar line up beat Chelsea but I bet people would have been saying exactly the same if we lost that one. I don't mind having priorities, it was a risk throwing on Carroll, Barton and Jonas but maybe he cared a little more than he made out. I still would have gone for that line up (or similar), as defeatist as it is to some people the league is priority 1, 2 and 3 for me. The main issue was right back, why play our shittest player up against their best player (in the starting eleven)? If we'd have a player playing there with some sense of tactical nous and timing we could have seen a different match. Granted, hindsights 20/20, but regardless on if I'd agree with most of the players in the starting eleven I was fuming by the sight of Perch's name in it. Fuck Perch. It's the first player who plays for us that I genuinely have started to literally despise. He's just so fucking shit. Er, Perch didn't play at right back. At any point. Left back, obviously. Perch played in the centre. Kadar was left back. Not according to the team sheet they showed on my telly. He was shit regardless. It angers me. Did you even watch it? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andy Posted October 27, 2010 Share Posted October 27, 2010 I'm sorry, bur again, did no one notice Smith getting booked TWICE?! Did that actually happen? No. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SteveMc Posted October 27, 2010 Share Posted October 27, 2010 Thought we played ok - especialy considering the line up. We looked really dangerous when the subs came on. Carroll should have scored that free header Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kaizero Posted October 27, 2010 Share Posted October 27, 2010 So fucking annoying that when something is there for the taking (the presumption Arsenal starts with pretty much their kids) we don't go for it. Especially when Hughton fucking plays Carroll, Jonas and Barton for pretty much an entire half as well, so much for "saving" them for the weekend. Fuck right off. So much more annoying than just losing when you know it could have been won if we'd not went with our reserves. Most of the Arsenal kids are better than our first team. It'd not have ended 0-4 if say, Colo, Enrique, Jonas, Carroll, Tiote and Barton had started. I dare say we'd probably have won it against the players they started with if we'd gone for it. A similar line up beat Chelsea but I bet people would have been saying exactly the same if we lost that one. I don't mind having priorities, it was a risk throwing on Carroll, Barton and Jonas but maybe he cared a little more than he made out. I still would have gone for that line up (or similar), as defeatist as it is to some people the league is priority 1, 2 and 3 for me. The main issue was right back, why play our shittest player up against their best player (in the starting eleven)? If we'd have a player playing there with some sense of tactical nous and timing we could have seen a different match. Granted, hindsights 20/20, but regardless on if I'd agree with most of the players in the starting eleven I was fuming by the sight of Perch's name in it. Fuck Perch. It's the first player who plays for us that I genuinely have started to literally despise. He's just so fucking shit. Er, Perch didn't play at right back. At any point. Left back, obviously. Perch played in the centre. Kadar was left back. Not according to the team sheet they showed on my telly. He was shit regardless. It angers me. Did you even watch it? Yes. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stu Posted October 27, 2010 Share Posted October 27, 2010 Where is the NUFC fans ffs, this is embarrassing support by our fans. On the internet. Can't stand people slagging the fans off when they're not there themselves, it's a joke. Here here (as neesy would say) Errrrr...don't you mean SDBS? But I concur, slagging off your own supporters when you're not there = shit. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JH Posted October 27, 2010 Share Posted October 27, 2010 I'm sorry, bur again, did no one notice Smith getting booked TWICE?! Did that actually happen? Aye, but he was the only one to see. Us and Sky both missed it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TaylorJ_01 Posted October 27, 2010 Share Posted October 27, 2010 I'm sorry, bur again, did no one notice Smith getting booked TWICE?! Did that actually happen? No. Right. What am I missing here? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andy Posted October 27, 2010 Share Posted October 27, 2010 I'm sorry, bur again, did no one notice Smith getting booked TWICE?! Did that actually happen? No. Right. What am I missing here? Well... Nothing. Because it didn't happen. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChrisMcQuillan Posted October 27, 2010 Share Posted October 27, 2010 Smith got booked in the first half for the tackle out wide. After the goal, he complained, touched the ref, and another yellow was shown. There were definitely two yellows, I think both to Smith, but the BBC only showed one card as being shown to anyone online. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Heneage Posted October 27, 2010 Share Posted October 27, 2010 Ranger is crying out for a loan move. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Disco Posted October 27, 2010 Share Posted October 27, 2010 Where is the NUFC fans ffs, this is embarrassing support by our fans. On the internet. Can't stand people slagging the fans off when they're not there themselves, it's a joke. Here here (as neesy would say) Errrrr...don't you mean SDBS? But I concur, slagging off your own supporters when you're not there = shit. 12,000 more there than SAFC got in their home game v a prem team in this comp. = for me. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nobody Posted October 27, 2010 Share Posted October 27, 2010 Means absolutely nothing this loss. If anything, it was a good run out for the likes of Vuckic, Kadar and Ranger, even though none of them had a blinder. Encouraging to see that we got so much better after the subs, and we all know that Colo+Enrique are ten times the defenders and players that Perch and Kadar are. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ronaldo Posted October 27, 2010 Share Posted October 27, 2010 We know you hate Lovenkrands. Please stop it now, we get it. I like the lad. But he's less use than a traffic cone at this level. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted October 27, 2010 Share Posted October 27, 2010 Smith got booked in the first half for the tackle out wide. After the goal, he complained, touched the ref, and another yellow was shown. There were definitely two yellows, I think both to Smith, but the BBC only showed one card as being shown to anyone online. Nobody was booked after a goal. Smith and Barton were booked for us. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TaylorJ_01 Posted October 27, 2010 Share Posted October 27, 2010 Go home Chris, you're drunk. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nobody Posted October 27, 2010 Share Posted October 27, 2010 So fucking annoying that when something is there for the taking (the presumption Arsenal starts with pretty much their kids) we don't go for it. Especially when Hughton fucking plays Carroll, Jonas and Barton for pretty much an entire half as well, so much for "saving" them for the weekend. Fuck right off. So much more annoying than just losing when you know it could have been won if we'd not went with our reserves. Most of the Arsenal kids are better than our first team. It'd not have ended 0-4 if say, Colo, Enrique, Jonas, Carroll, Tiote and Barton had started. I dare say we'd probably have won it against the players they started with if we'd gone for it. A similar line up beat Chelsea but I bet people would have been saying exactly the same if we lost that one. I don't mind having priorities, it was a risk throwing on Carroll, Barton and Jonas but maybe he cared a little more than he made out. I still would have gone for that line up (or similar), as defeatist as it is to some people the league is priority 1, 2 and 3 for me. The main issue was right back, why play our shittest player up against their best player (in the starting eleven)? If we'd have a player playing there with some sense of tactical nous and timing we could have seen a different match. Granted, hindsights 20/20, but regardless on if I'd agree with most of the players in the starting eleven I was fuming by the sight of Perch's name in it. Fuck Perch. It's the first player who plays for us that I genuinely have started to literally despise. He's just so fucking shit. Er, Perch didn't play at right back. At any point. Left back, obviously. Perch played in the centre. Kadar was left back. Not according to the team sheet they showed on my telly. He was shit regardless. It angers me. How do you watch the entire game and don't see that he was CB? And he wasn't shit at all, surprisingly good there iyam. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now