Guest EastEndGeordie Posted February 26, 2011 Share Posted February 26, 2011 OMG is this a joke right people lets have a look at Charlton - Relegated West Ham - Would've been relegated if he hadn't have been sacked. Souphamtpon - League one fuck off. Newcastle - Wow I'll just use Hughtons team and win four matches but lose against Stevanage = Better than Hughton who has won more trophies than Pardew in his career. This is stupid folks really stupid, please wake up next year this is going to be embarrising. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest ObiChrisKenobi Posted February 26, 2011 Share Posted February 26, 2011 Newcastle - Wow I'll just use Hughtons team and win four matches but lose against Stevanage = Better than Hughton who has won more trophies than Pardew in his career. Management wise they have 1 each? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ronaldo Posted February 26, 2011 Share Posted February 26, 2011 You're the one who looks stupid for not recognizing an improvement. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yorkie Posted February 26, 2011 Share Posted February 26, 2011 Although i'm coming round to Pardew, you've got to concede that his record in the Premiership is average at best; it's still very much up in the air as to whether or not he's going to be the person to take us forward long-term. But you can't argue with his first three months in charge - he's doing a really good job. It's all about this summer. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest EastEndGeordie Posted February 26, 2011 Share Posted February 26, 2011 You're the one who looks stupid for not recognizing an improvement. 1-1 against the Mackems 5-1 against the Mackems. Wow what an improvement. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yorkie Posted February 26, 2011 Share Posted February 26, 2011 Urgh. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest ObiChrisKenobi Posted February 26, 2011 Share Posted February 26, 2011 You're the one who looks stupid for not recognizing an improvement. 1-1 against the Mackems 5-1 against the Mackems. Wow what an improvement. Love how you take away all context from the games. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest EastEndGeordie Posted February 26, 2011 Share Posted February 26, 2011 Although i'm coming round to Pardew, you've got to concede that his record in the Premiership is average at best; it's still very much up in the air as to whether or not he's going to be the person to take us forward long-term. But you can't argue with his first three months in charge - he's doing a really good job. It's all about this summer. Right Souness went on a seven match unbeaten streak. Trust me three months means fuck all. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mick Posted February 26, 2011 Share Posted February 26, 2011 I don't get what you mean. You said that you'd have taken Lovenkrands off and pushed Simpson up... both of those things happened. Unless you mean we should have stayed with the 4-4-1 with Simpson on the wing and Taylor at RB...? Whatever, i don't think it's really relevant. We were infinitely better after the switch in formation. Killed off any of their attacking potency and made us more dangerous going forward. Enrique filled the void left by Jonas' sub, by pushing up into the wing-back position. And did well. I would have kept Jonas on and not brought Taylor on. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yorkie Posted February 26, 2011 Share Posted February 26, 2011 Although i'm coming round to Pardew, you've got to concede that his record in the Premiership is average at best; it's still very much up in the air as to whether or not he's going to be the person to take us forward long-term. But you can't argue with his first three months in charge - he's doing a really good job. It's all about this summer. Right Souness went on a seven match unbeaten streak. Trust me three months means fuck all. I said exactly the same about Souness at the time. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest EastEndGeordie Posted February 26, 2011 Share Posted February 26, 2011 You're the one who looks stupid for not recognizing an improvement. 1-1 against the Mackems 5-1 against the Mackems. Wow what an improvement. Love how you take away all context from the games. I love that everybody seems to forget his record. It is crap and he always does well in the first season and crap in the second, this is undeniable. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest palnese Posted February 26, 2011 Share Posted February 26, 2011 You're the one who looks stupid for not recognizing an improvement. 1-1 against the Mackems 5-1 against the Mackems. Wow what an improvement. 1-5 against Bolton. 1-1 against Bolton. Brilliant logic. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest ObiChrisKenobi Posted February 26, 2011 Share Posted February 26, 2011 You're the one who looks stupid for not recognizing an improvement. 1-1 against the Mackems 5-1 against the Mackems. Wow what an improvement. Love how you take away all context from the games. I love that everybody seems to forget his record. It is crap and he always does well in the first season and crap in the second, this is undeniable. I haven't. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ashley17 Posted February 26, 2011 Share Posted February 26, 2011 You're the one who looks stupid for not recognizing an improvement. 1-1 against the Mackems 5-1 against the Mackems. Wow what an improvement. Love how you take away all context from the games. I love that everybody seems to forget his record. It is crap and he always does well in the first season and crap in the second, this is undeniable. Surely therefore you are forgetting his record by saying he is rubbish in his first season? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest neesy111 Posted February 26, 2011 Share Posted February 26, 2011 You're the one who looks stupid for not recognizing an improvement. 1-1 against the Mackems 5-1 against the Mackems. Wow what an improvement. 1-5 against Bolton. 1-1 against Bolton. Brilliant logic. Was just about to post same thing. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest EastEndGeordie Posted February 26, 2011 Share Posted February 26, 2011 You're the one who looks stupid for not recognizing an improvement. 1-1 against the Mackems 5-1 against the Mackems. Wow what an improvement. 1-5 against Bolton. 1-1 against Bolton. Brilliant logic. Right because Pardew only had Guthrie and Smith for CM didn't he? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Prophet Posted February 26, 2011 Share Posted February 26, 2011 You're the one who looks stupid for not recognizing an improvement. 1-1 against the Mackems 5-1 against the Mackems. Wow what an improvement. WUMing, surely no one's that daft? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Disco Posted February 26, 2011 Share Posted February 26, 2011 Yawn. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest neesy111 Posted February 26, 2011 Share Posted February 26, 2011 You're the one who looks stupid for not recognizing an improvement. 1-1 against the Mackems 5-1 against the Mackems. Wow what an improvement. 1-5 against Bolton. 1-1 against Bolton. Brilliant logic. Right because Pardew only had Guthrie and Smith for CM didn't he? You're the one who looks stupid for not recognizing an improvement. 1-1 against the Mackems 5-1 against the Mackems. Wow what an improvement. 1-5 against Bolton. 1-1 against Bolton. Brilliant logic. Right because Pardew only had Guthrie and Smith for CM didn't he? Pardew has 1 defeat in 8 games with a strike force of Best and Lovenkrands. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest palnese Posted February 26, 2011 Share Posted February 26, 2011 You're the one who looks stupid for not recognizing an improvement. 1-1 against the Mackems 5-1 against the Mackems. Wow what an improvement. 1-5 against Bolton. 1-1 against Bolton. Brilliant logic. Right because Pardew only had Guthrie and Smith for CM didn't he? Gan to bed man. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pilko Posted February 26, 2011 Share Posted February 26, 2011 You're the one who looks stupid for not recognizing an improvement. 1-1 against the Mackems 5-1 against the Mackems. Wow what an improvement. 1-5 against Bolton. 1-1 against Bolton. Brilliant logic. Right because Pardew only had Guthrie and Smith for CM didn't he? In both the 5-1 loss at Bolton and the 1-1 draw at Sunderland, the respective managers had Nolan, Smith and Guthrie available for CM. Don't even know why I'm arguing with you like, you're talking absolute bollocks and clearly have some sort of agenda with Pardew. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vinny Green Balls Posted February 26, 2011 Share Posted February 26, 2011 Selective fucking reasoning to make Rumsfeld blush. As much as I dislike what has transpired with Hughton and how Pardew came in, you cannot fault him for his time here. His record, despite being crippled up front, speaks for itself. So far he has blown my expectations out of the water. Not convinced it will last forever, but he seems willing to adapt to the situation, and isn't crippling our style of play. He didn't come in with the mind to level everything Hughton did, but instead to build on his achievements. Tweaks here and there. Hope he keeps it up and emphatically proves me wrong. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest EastEndGeordie Posted February 26, 2011 Share Posted February 26, 2011 You're the one who looks stupid for not recognizing an improvement. 1-1 against the Mackems 5-1 against the Mackems. Wow what an improvement. 1-5 against Bolton. 1-1 against Bolton. Brilliant logic. Right because Pardew only had Guthrie and Smith for CM didn't he? Gan to bed man. I'm right and you know it, I'd rather have Tiote and Barton then Carroll, oh and Colo sent off, how in the hell do you reckon that Pards does better. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ashley17 Posted February 26, 2011 Share Posted February 26, 2011 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest EastEndGeordie Posted February 26, 2011 Share Posted February 26, 2011 You're the one who looks stupid for not recognizing an improvement. 1-1 against the Mackems 5-1 against the Mackems. Wow what an improvement. 1-5 against Bolton. 1-1 against Bolton. Brilliant logic. Right because Pardew only had Guthrie and Smith for CM didn't he? In both the 5-1 loss at Bolton and the 1-1 draw at Sunderland, the respective managers had Nolan, Smith and Guthrie available for CM. Don't even know why I'm arguing with you like, you're talking absolute bollocks and clearly have some sort of agenda with Pardew. Yeah I do he replaced Hughton, he is an unscrupolus twat who if you look back at his record has no loyalty and a crap PL record. http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/teams/w/west_ham_utd/3120534.stm http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/teams/w/west_ham_utd/4201197.stm http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/teams/w/west_ham_utd/6082588.stm Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts