JH Posted January 10, 2011 Share Posted January 10, 2011 As a Newcastle fan i'm begging it's overturned. As a football fan i kinda hope it isn't. Whether he won the ball or not you shouldn't go in on players like that. Cheick won the ball cos he's f***ing brilliant... most players aren't as good as him and, i reckon, over half the time a player goes in like that - they'll get atleast some of the man. It's dangerous. If he was a second (less than, tbh) out of time he'd have snapped the players leg in half. Punish Tiote for being good at his job, let De Jong walk away for being s**** at it...mad world. De Jong's was just as reckless and he should have been sent off too - i f***ing hate what happened then, and it's kinda my point. It's just unfortunate it's one of our players. You should get sent off for going in two-footed, off the floor imo. Everything you've said in this past couple of pages has been spot on - this feels weird De Jong's was reckless and dangerous and should have resulted in a red card. Tiote's was less reckless and less dangerous, but it doesn't make it not a reckless and dangerous challenge. Needless to say, I hope the appeal works. For the sake of the team, we really need him. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yorkie Posted January 10, 2011 Share Posted January 10, 2011 Both his feet were off the floor. so it was a lunge then Are we arguing semantics here? Personally i just think it's a reckless way to initiate a tackle. I'm a fan of big tackles too, like Toon's Taylor says, but it was as close to being a leg-breaker without actually being one. It should have been a red for that alone imo. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JH Posted January 10, 2011 Share Posted January 10, 2011 More than anything, who's to say that Marriner knew anything about Tiote as a player? He may have been in control and executed the challenge brilliantly because he is brilliant, but how is that relevant to the referee making a decision? He has to make the same decision whether it's Cheik Tiote making the challenge, or Kyle Naughtan. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skirge Posted January 10, 2011 Share Posted January 10, 2011 Surely a two footed tackle means both feet go towards man and ball? Tiote did not go in two footed Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hanshithispantz Posted January 10, 2011 Share Posted January 10, 2011 I probably just am arguing for the sake of it like as it doesn't realy matter Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hanshithispantz Posted January 10, 2011 Share Posted January 10, 2011 Anyway the tackle is a wierd one, did he use unnecisary force? Was he in control? Was he reckless? I think thats the criteria that the look at, and tbh i cannot see us winning an appeal and the fa undermining one of there officials in such a case. Utter discusting he'll more than likely face a 3 match ban where as de jong walked free like. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Geordiesned Posted January 10, 2011 Share Posted January 10, 2011 As a Newcastle fan i'm begging it's overturned. As a football fan i kinda hope it isn't. Whether he won the ball or not you shouldn't go in on players like that. Cheick won the ball cos he's fucking brilliant... most players aren't as good as him and, i reckon, over half the time a player goes in like that - they'll get atleast some of the man. It's dangerous. If he was a second (less than, tbh) out of time he'd have snapped the players leg in half. Bollocks. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest GeordieAce Posted January 10, 2011 Share Posted January 10, 2011 I don't think it was the actual tackle that got him sent off, more the fact it was very dangerous play. Get that wrong and as people have said your looking at a leg breaker. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JH Posted January 10, 2011 Share Posted January 10, 2011 And like I say, with the FA panel, the fact that he's brilliant won't even come into account. They have to treat him the same as an average player performing the same challenge. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hanshithispantz Posted January 10, 2011 Share Posted January 10, 2011 One thing thats nice to see like is newcastle fans not instantly sticking up for him as he's tiote, went on the city boards after ben arfa had his leg hacked in half and not 1 person admited it was a bad challenge and we were just a bunch of geordie puffs, was cringeworthy to be honest. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jdckelly Posted January 10, 2011 Share Posted January 10, 2011 And like I say, with the FA panel, the fact that he's brilliant won't even come into account. They have to treat him the same as an average player performing the same challenge. unless his name is stevie g which i am certain will be appealed and overturned Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Tall Striker Posted January 10, 2011 Share Posted January 10, 2011 Even if it's downgraded to a yellow, wouldn't he still get his tenth yellow and a 2 game ban? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JH Posted January 10, 2011 Share Posted January 10, 2011 Even if it's downgraded to a yellow, wouldn't he still get his tenth yellow and a 2 game ban? 9th yellow IIRC. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Greg Posted January 10, 2011 Share Posted January 10, 2011 Even if it's downgraded to a yellow, wouldn't he still get his tenth yellow and a 2 game ban? Would be his 9th. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Tall Striker Posted January 10, 2011 Share Posted January 10, 2011 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
binnsy Posted January 10, 2011 Share Posted January 10, 2011 when is the result of the appeal meant to be, i must've spent all afternoon at work today checking here, .com, skysports, bbc etc then i leave work, nowt on radio, been out and about come in and still nothing!!! The suspense is killing me even though i know deep down that the FA won't rescind it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yorkie Posted January 10, 2011 Share Posted January 10, 2011 As a Newcastle fan i'm begging it's overturned. As a football fan i kinda hope it isn't. Whether he won the ball or not you shouldn't go in on players like that. Cheick won the ball cos he's fucking brilliant... most players aren't as good as him and, i reckon, over half the time a player goes in like that - they'll get atleast some of the man. It's dangerous. If he was a second (less than, tbh) out of time he'd have snapped the players leg in half. Bollocks. Atleast argue man! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Optimistic Nut Posted January 10, 2011 Share Posted January 10, 2011 As a Newcastle fan i'm begging it's overturned. As a football fan i kinda hope it isn't. Whether he won the ball or not you shouldn't go in on players like that. Cheick won the ball cos he's f***ing brilliant... most players aren't as good as him and, i reckon, over half the time a player goes in like that - they'll get atleast some of the man. It's dangerous. If he was a second (less than, tbh) out of time he'd have snapped the players leg in half. Bollocks. Atleast argue man! He was nowhere near the player when he left the ground though, and he certainly wasn't in the air when the tackle was made. I don't think for one second he'd have went for the ball in that manner if he didn't think he'd win the ball and not hurt the opponent. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted January 10, 2011 Share Posted January 10, 2011 when is the result of the appeal meant to be, i must've spent all afternoon at work today checking here, .com, skysports, bbc etc then i leave work, nowt on radio, been out and about come in and still nothing!!! The suspense is killing me even though i know deep down that the FA won't rescind it. I posted the rules on the previous page, have a look. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
PM Posted January 10, 2011 Share Posted January 10, 2011 A tackle on Robbie Savage in the first half was probably the worst of the weekend. Result - yellow card. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
junkhead Posted January 11, 2011 Share Posted January 11, 2011 Just noticed the appeal is today. Fingers crossed. We all know what's going to happen if Alan Smith 'protects' the back-four in the derby.. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JCONA Posted January 11, 2011 Share Posted January 11, 2011 Asif you have to pay a fee of £1500 to appeal a decision!? If it was their mistake in the first place !? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
wormy Posted January 11, 2011 Share Posted January 11, 2011 Should be a deposit to ensure clubs don't use the system frivolously, and if the appeal is upheld, they should get it refunded back. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Colocho Posted January 11, 2011 Share Posted January 11, 2011 Should be a deposit to ensure clubs don't use the system frivolously There is, they add make it a 4 match ban. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
junkhead Posted January 11, 2011 Share Posted January 11, 2011 Still no news on the appeal.. not good :| Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now