Ghandis Flip-Flop Posted January 8, 2011 Share Posted January 8, 2011 I think he will be ok for th Sunderland game if we appeal Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest sicko2ndbest Posted January 8, 2011 Share Posted January 8, 2011 There was virtually no appealing from the Stevenage players Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
henke Posted January 8, 2011 Share Posted January 8, 2011 The way i saw it, tiote jumped for a ball that was about 3 or 4 feet in front of the player. And as he got the ball the other player and tiote and the ball collided. 15 years ago, no problem. But in modern that is a red card. But like i said i hope it looks better later and more importantly i hope the fa see do us a favour. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Stephen927 Posted January 8, 2011 Share Posted January 8, 2011 I don't expect Tiote to give anything less than 100%. He showed more heart and desire in that tackle than the entire squad put together (bar Barton and Airey). Pardew needed a reaction, I think Guthrie would have done exactly the same as Smith, and to carry on with Smith playing would be defeatist. Tiote at least carries the ball well, and doesn't waste it needlessly. You're going to get red cards and yellows with players like Tiote, it's pointless trying to change them because the fire in his belly makes him the player he is. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JH Posted January 8, 2011 Share Posted January 8, 2011 There was virtually no appealing from the Stevenage players and that makes any difference how? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guinness_fiend Posted January 8, 2011 Share Posted January 8, 2011 I don't expect Tiote to give anything less than 100%. He showed more heart and desire in that tackle than the entire squad put together (bar Barton and Airey). Pardew needed a reaction, I think Guthrie would have done exactly the same as Smith, and to carry on with Smith playing would be defeatist. Tiote at least carries the ball well, and doesn't waste it needlessly. You're going to get red cards and yellows with players like Tiote, it's pointless trying to change them because the fire in his belly makes him the player he is. Forumite in common sense shocker! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest sicko2ndbest Posted January 8, 2011 Share Posted January 8, 2011 There was virtually no appealing from the Stevenage players and that makes any difference how? I would back a players judgement on the pitch close to the action over any ref. They play the game they know what constitutes a great tackle and what constitutes dangerous foul play. They saw it as a great challenge and were ready to carry on playing Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
PM Posted January 8, 2011 Share Posted January 8, 2011 I don't expect Tiote to give anything less than 100%. He showed more heart and desire in that tackle than the entire squad put together (bar Barton and Airey). This is like the "Smith gives his all" argument people have been coming out with for ages. Jumping into tackles does not equal heart and desire, it equals stupidity and naivety. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
midds Posted January 8, 2011 Share Posted January 8, 2011 100% red card. Didn't do too much damage but was reckless and he had no control once he'd decided to jump in. Won't be overturned and they'll probably make it 4. Stupid 'tackle' to make in the first place. In keeping with the rest of the game tbh. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted January 8, 2011 Share Posted January 8, 2011 There was virtually no appealing from the Stevenage players and that makes any difference how? I would back a players judgement on the pitch close to the action over any ref. They play the game they know what constitutes a great tackle and what constitutes dangerous foul play. They saw it as a great challenge and were ready to carry on playing Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
colinmk Posted January 8, 2011 Share Posted January 8, 2011 It wasn't dangerous because it was timed to perfection and you can clearly see that his studs couldn't of caught the player. Sendings off for perfect tackles now then? Load of shite. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JH Posted January 8, 2011 Share Posted January 8, 2011 There was virtually no appealing from the Stevenage players and that makes any difference how? I would back a players judgement on the pitch close to the action over any ref. They play the game they know what constitutes a great tackle and what constitutes dangerous foul play. They saw it as a great challenge and were ready to carry on playing There have been plenty of times players have went insane hands flying over handballs that weren't handballs, and surrounded the referee on goals and challenges they feel shouldn't have stood, when it's clear it's all don to influence the ref - how do explain the 'player judgement' in these cases? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ryan_Taylor Posted January 8, 2011 Share Posted January 8, 2011 Can it be downgraded to a yellow and him still be banned. If it can that's what'll happen Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ElDiablo Posted January 8, 2011 Share Posted January 8, 2011 Looked a brilliant challenge from behind the goal, jumped in but clearly got the ball. Will have to see it again though. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ketsbaia Posted January 8, 2011 Share Posted January 8, 2011 one of the worst decisions i've ever seen, which says a lot in the era of Lampard-gate and the phantom goal. in my opinion, it was never ever ever a red card. but it wont get overturned because football is shit. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ryan_Taylor Posted January 8, 2011 Share Posted January 8, 2011 When will we know if there's an appeal? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted January 8, 2011 Share Posted January 8, 2011 When will we know if there's an appeal? There is, Pardew confirmed we would be doing. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ryan_Taylor Posted January 8, 2011 Share Posted January 8, 2011 When will we know if there's an appeal? There is, Pardew confirmed we would be doing. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ketsbaia Posted January 8, 2011 Share Posted January 8, 2011 When will we know if there's an appeal? There is, Pardew confirmed we would be doing. Good decision. Wish he showed a similar competency with the substitutions...... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest sicko2ndbest Posted January 8, 2011 Share Posted January 8, 2011 There was virtually no appealing from the Stevenage players and that makes any difference how? I would back a players judgement on the pitch close to the action over any ref. They play the game they know what constitutes a great tackle and what constitutes dangerous foul play. They saw it as a great challenge and were ready to carry on playing There have been plenty of times players have went insane hands flying over handballs that weren't handballs, and surrounded the referee on goals and challenges they feel shouldn't have stood, when it's clear it's all don to influence the ref - how do explain the 'player judgement' in these cases? I know what your saying, but in many of those instances they know its a borderline decision so they hope by voicing their opinions it is going to tip the scales in their favour I dont think it even entered the Stevenage plaers heads as it wasnt even borderline, it was just a fantastic challenge Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
cp40 Posted January 8, 2011 Share Posted January 8, 2011 very not happy - dont think theres much chance of it being overturned should have been a yellow- but it was wreckless and 2 feet off the ground- so now we miss a heavyweight for the game against the unwashed monkeys. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Stephen927 Posted January 8, 2011 Share Posted January 8, 2011 I don't expect Tiote to give anything less than 100%. He showed more heart and desire in that tackle than the entire squad put together (bar Barton and Airey). This is like the "Smith gives his all" argument people have been coming out with for ages. Jumping into tackles does not equal heart and desire, it equals stupidity and naivety. Yeah, Tiote is stupid and naive because he wants to win the ball back. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ponsaelius Posted January 8, 2011 Share Posted January 8, 2011 I don't expect Tiote to give anything less than 100%. He showed more heart and desire in that tackle than the entire squad put together (bar Barton and Airey). This is like the "Smith gives his all" argument people have been coming out with for ages. Jumping into tackles does not equal heart and desire, it equals stupidity and naivety. Yeah, Tiote is stupid and naive because he wants to win the ball back. Yup. He's extra stupid because he succeeded in doing so. How NAIVE of him. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Minhosa Posted January 8, 2011 Share Posted January 8, 2011 There's more chance of Angelina Jolie waking me up with a blow job than this getting overturned btw. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Geordiesned Posted January 8, 2011 Share Posted January 8, 2011 If the ref had any balls he would view the footage, realise he's made a mistake and downgrade it to a yellow without need for an appeal. Unfortunately Andre Marriner has already shown us this season that he's a cunt so he won't. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now