Skeletor Posted June 4, 2011 Share Posted June 4, 2011 http://i52.tinypic.com/2vc9d74.png Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
morpeth mag Posted June 4, 2011 Share Posted June 4, 2011 Jonas will only be sold if Enrique goes: will Liverpool buy them as a pair when they're so heavily linked to the Zog? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pilko Posted June 4, 2011 Share Posted June 4, 2011 I reckon it'll be Harper. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted June 4, 2011 Share Posted June 4, 2011 http://i52.tinypic.com/2vc9d74.png Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ponsaelius Posted June 4, 2011 Share Posted June 4, 2011 http://i52.tinypic.com/2vc9d74.png Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
James Posted June 4, 2011 Share Posted June 4, 2011 If we can get a good fee for Jonas and it gets spent on someone else (also including the Carroll money), I'm highly favourable to it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest je85 Posted June 4, 2011 Share Posted June 4, 2011 Xisco signs a new extended contract, it's like a new signing. Edit: someone needs to stick that on a colourful meme with a picture of the relevant meme animal. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jill Posted June 4, 2011 Share Posted June 4, 2011 http://i52.tinypic.com/2vc9d74.png Awesome. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted June 4, 2011 Share Posted June 4, 2011 Could be there was truth in the Barton to Liverpool thing. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest BlacknWhiteArmy Posted June 4, 2011 Share Posted June 4, 2011 Jonas will only be sold if Enrique goes: will Liverpool buy them as a pair when they're so heavily linked to the Zog? As if Jonas is good enough to go there. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ponsaelius Posted June 4, 2011 Share Posted June 4, 2011 If we can get a good fee for Jonas and it gets spent on someone else (also including the Carroll money), I'm highly favourable to it. You're such a massive hypocrite. One post you say you don't want such a high turnover of players because it's important to keep a core of players together, now you're adocating selling key components of our first XI to fund new signings. Make your fucking mind up. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
PENKAAA Posted June 4, 2011 Share Posted June 4, 2011 Nah mate just throwing another theory into the ring. I wouldn't be surprised if forster did go to Celtic mind, if that's the 'shock'. Pardew was quoted as saying Forster would be fighting for his place at Newcastle Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest BlacknWhiteArmy Posted June 4, 2011 Share Posted June 4, 2011 Coloccini. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
James Posted June 4, 2011 Share Posted June 4, 2011 If we can get a good fee for Jonas and it gets spent on someone else (also including the Carroll money), I'm highly favourable to it. You're such a massive hypocrite. One post you say you don't want such a high turnover of players because it's important to keep a core of players together, now you're adocating selling key components of our first XI to fund new signings. Make your fucking mind up. I think that of the midfield he's the only truly replaceable one. The rest are integral. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ponsaelius Posted June 4, 2011 Share Posted June 4, 2011 If we can get a good fee for Jonas and it gets spent on someone else (also including the Carroll money), I'm highly favourable to it. You're such a massive hypocrite. One post you say you don't want such a high turnover of players because it's important to keep a core of players together, now you're adocating selling key components of our first XI to fund new signings. Make your fucking mind up. I think that of the midfield he's the only truly replaceable one. The rest are integral. Bollocks. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tsunami Posted June 4, 2011 Share Posted June 4, 2011 Barton is the obvious one; losing Smith would be like making a new signing and would be fantastic. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest BlacknWhiteArmy Posted June 4, 2011 Share Posted June 4, 2011 Losing Smith. The team that got him would be the ones losing. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
James Posted June 4, 2011 Share Posted June 4, 2011 If we can get a good fee for Jonas and it gets spent on someone else (also including the Carroll money), I'm highly favourable to it. You're such a massive hypocrite. One post you say you don't want such a high turnover of players because it's important to keep a core of players together, now you're adocating selling key components of our first XI to fund new signings. Make your fucking mind up. I think that of the midfield he's the only truly replaceable one. The rest are integral. Bollocks. Of course, I'm sure if Jonas was John Granger and Nolan was Kaka Nolina you'd be saying differently Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ponsaelius Posted June 4, 2011 Share Posted June 4, 2011 What in the absolute fuck does that mean you blithering fool? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
James Posted June 4, 2011 Share Posted June 4, 2011 What in the absolute fuck does that mean you blithering fool? I'm saying that you have a bad habit of overrating foreign players in comparison to their British counterparts. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ponsaelius Posted June 4, 2011 Share Posted June 4, 2011 I'm saying that's utter shite. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
PENKAAA Posted June 4, 2011 Share Posted June 4, 2011 If we can get a good fee for Jonas and it gets spent on someone else (also including the Carroll money), I'm highly favourable to it. You're such a massive hypocrite. One post you say you don't want such a high turnover of players because it's important to keep a core of players together, now you're adocating selling key components of our first XI to fund new signings. Make your f***ing mind up. I think that of the midfield he's the only truly replaceable one. The rest are integral. Bollocks. Of course, I'm sure if Jonas was John Granger and Nolan was Kaka Nolina you'd be saying differently Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ponsaelius Posted June 4, 2011 Share Posted June 4, 2011 Jonas was probably our best player in the second half of the season, btw. He was just as important as Nolan and Barton IMO, but quite ironically considering what you were accusing me of, you're undervaluing his contribution because he's not a vocal English player in the same way as Barton and Nolan are. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
James Posted June 4, 2011 Share Posted June 4, 2011 I'm saying that's utter shite. Well maybe you should stop being so confrontational whenever someone says something you don't agree with. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ponsaelius Posted June 4, 2011 Share Posted June 4, 2011 Soz m8. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now