Dave Posted June 7, 2016 Share Posted June 7, 2016 He's a proper chancer like. Doesn't have anything like the diction and eloquence you'd expect of someone with so much responsibility and money earned through business. Spot on. It's like listening to someone down the pub, who owns a one man and his dog, painting and decorating firm. No offence meant to painters!! Listening to this chancer,it's becoming much clearer why Pardew was here so long. Two peas in a pod. And the stupid long contracts. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
54 Posted June 7, 2016 Share Posted June 7, 2016 He does generally look like he has mental issues like Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Interpolic Posted June 7, 2016 Share Posted June 7, 2016 Guy's making a fucking tit of himself here like. Thick as fuck. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TK-421 Posted June 7, 2016 Share Posted June 7, 2016 Sorry if its been mentioned already, but what is the aim of this session? Can Parliament do anything to force him to change the working practices? Or is this just to try and shame him into doing it, by making him discuss it publicly? I heard stuff on radio this morning where he is promising to do stuff for the staff, clearly just trying to look pro-active before this meeting. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest chopey Posted June 7, 2016 Share Posted June 7, 2016 I think he's starting to turn it around Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lush Vlad Posted June 7, 2016 Share Posted June 7, 2016 He just keeps saying "I think so. I hope it has been done." Is he the owner of SD or not?! Fuck me. He is awful. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest reefatoon Posted June 7, 2016 Share Posted June 7, 2016 I think he's starting to turn it around Yep, the lines of coke are kicking in now. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Klaus Posted June 7, 2016 Share Posted June 7, 2016 'Promised a permanent contract, in return for sexual favours' Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lush Vlad Posted June 7, 2016 Share Posted June 7, 2016 110 ambulances to Shirebrook in a 3 year period Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest chopey Posted June 7, 2016 Share Posted June 7, 2016 110 ambulances to Shirebrook in a 3 year period 2000 people work there is that excessive ? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted June 7, 2016 Share Posted June 7, 2016 He just keeps saying "I think so. I hope it has been done." Is he the owner of SD or not?! Fuck me. He is awful. It's exactly the same as when he gave that interview last season saying it was all his responsibility then this season claimed he just lets others run the club. He's got no concept of his own responsibility, seems to believe he can just take the money and let everyone around him deal with the problems. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Interpolic Posted June 7, 2016 Share Posted June 7, 2016 This is fucking ripe for a CassetteBoy job like Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
PRL Posted June 7, 2016 Share Posted June 7, 2016 I fucking hate the guy, but having sadly squandered several hours watching select committee 'performances', this is actually one of the better ones. His stupidity can easily be mistaken for honesty and the committee are going easy on him because he is admitting a degree of liability. Normally you get people desperately trying to avoid the question and change the angle to put out their agenda, which results in those questioning being far harsher. All that said, I've only watched the last 20 minutes or so, may have been a car crash before that. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Geordie Posted June 7, 2016 Share Posted June 7, 2016 Yup - a real lack of personal responsibly. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
junkhead Posted June 7, 2016 Share Posted June 7, 2016 He's a shy and anti-social guy for sure. I remember when I 'confronted' him, LL Cool D and Bishop outside of a pub in Soho. He simply nodded, kept on looking down, avoiding eye contact and stuff. In fact he looked so intimidated and uncomfortable that I genuinely felt bad for approaching him. Llambias and Bishop on the other hand are much more accomplished verbal bullshitters. Llambias basically made me thank them for all the positive things they've done for the club Those MP hearings are a bit of a farce though. "What would you do Chris?" Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lush Vlad Posted June 7, 2016 Share Posted June 7, 2016 110 ambulances to Shirebrook in a 3 year period 2000 people work there is that excessive ? Well he seemed to think so and so did the committee. Seems like a reasonably poor HSE record. Roughly 3 ambulances called out per month does seem a bit high, to me? But I don't work in health and safety and I don't know what other companies are like in comparison. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted June 7, 2016 Share Posted June 7, 2016 Can see why he refused to do this like. Or more likely someone advised him not to. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wallace Posted June 7, 2016 Share Posted June 7, 2016 Sorry if its been mentioned already, but what is the aim of this session? Can Parliament do anything to force him to change the working practices? Or is this just to try and shame him into doing it, by making him discuss it publicly? I heard stuff on radio this morning where he is promising to do stuff for the staff, clearly just trying to look pro-active before this meeting. http://www.chroniclelive.co.uk/news/north-east-news/mike-ashley-house-commons-live-11434154 What happens afterwards? The MPs will eventually write a report with their conclusions about Sports Direct’s treatment of its staff. Even if they ask tough questions, it doesn’t mean their report will necessarily criticise Mr Ashley or Sports Direct. They are likely to consider whether laws protecting workers need to be changed, or are currently being enforced properly. The Government will then publish its official response to the Committee’s report. This process could take weeks or months, Before writing the report, it’s possible that the MPs could decide they want to hear more evidence - and this could mean accepting Mr Ashley’s offer to show them round the Shirebrook warehouse. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Interpolic Posted June 7, 2016 Share Posted June 7, 2016 Starting to get my hopes up he's going to have a heart attack here. Breathing heavily. If not, can they do this every week? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bigfella Posted June 7, 2016 Share Posted June 7, 2016 110 ambulances to Shirebrook in a 3 year period 2000 people work there is that excessive ? I work in a factory that employs roughly 1100 people. I've been there over 12 years and there's been ambulances called less than ten times. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ash Posted June 7, 2016 Share Posted June 7, 2016 "If I dropped dead tomorrow..." We're not that lucky. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Interpolic Posted June 7, 2016 Share Posted June 7, 2016 "If I drop dead tomorrow..." It's happening, lads. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mouldy_uk Posted June 7, 2016 Share Posted June 7, 2016 "My understanding is..." I don't know if I can take him saying that one more time Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted June 7, 2016 Share Posted June 7, 2016 Actually think the report will come down quite hard on him based on this. He simply doesn't know what's going on, just pays people to think for him. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Klaus Posted June 7, 2016 Share Posted June 7, 2016 Guys, this bloke owns Newcastle United :lol: Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts