Guest neesy111 Posted January 6, 2015 Share Posted January 6, 2015 Surely if he sells Sissoko and appoints Carver there will be rioting? Murmurings of booing and that'll be it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
aussiemag Posted January 6, 2015 Share Posted January 6, 2015 Ill fly over to riot. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skeletor Posted January 6, 2015 Share Posted January 6, 2015 Surely if he sells Sissoko and appoints Carver there will be rioting? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dan Posted January 6, 2015 Share Posted January 6, 2015 Surely if he sells Sissoko and appoints Carver there will be rioting? Polite boo's. Like when everyone bottled the whole SackPardew protest v Hull. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Interpolic Posted January 6, 2015 Share Posted January 6, 2015 Surely if he sells Sissoko and appoints Carver there will be rioting? "We're shit... and ambivalent". Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Roger Kint Posted January 6, 2015 Share Posted January 6, 2015 If we sell Sissoko and appoint Carver i will be so angry i will only buy two pies at half time at the Stoke game Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
aussiemag Posted January 6, 2015 Share Posted January 6, 2015 That Hull anti-Pardew protest was one of the worst moments in our clubs history. The apathy in the crowd was just such a depressing sight. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dan Posted January 6, 2015 Share Posted January 6, 2015 If we sell Sissoko and appoint Carver i will be so angry i will only buy two pies at half time at the Stoke game Brilliant haha Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
aussiemag Posted January 6, 2015 Share Posted January 6, 2015 If we sell Sissoko and appoint Carver i will be so angry i will only buy two pies at half time at the Stoke game Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ads Posted January 6, 2015 Share Posted January 6, 2015 Don't like the way ashley runs it, don't go. That really is the only sensible way of looking at it. Living in Hull there's a mate of mine who does the same thing for Hull City. Been a season ticket holder for years, he despises Allam and the idea of changing the club name etc. He's boycotted matches but his mates haven't. Feel a bit sorry for him but I guess he's doing his bit like. It's just a day out for everyone else. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mistle17 Posted January 6, 2015 Share Posted January 6, 2015 Surely if he sells Sissoko and appoints Carver there will be rioting? SUPPORT THE TEAM MAN! CARVER'S ALREADY SAID BURNLEY RAN MORE THAN US!! GET A GRIP YA BASTAD Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Noodles Posted January 6, 2015 Share Posted January 6, 2015 Surely if he sells Sissoko and appoints Carver there will be rioting? :lol: All we'll do is bend over and ask Ashley if he'd like another go on our hoop. It's all we seem to be fuckin good at at the moment. There again we could always try and stage another walk out and then let NUST make a complete twat of it again. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SEMTEX Posted January 6, 2015 Share Posted January 6, 2015 Surely if he sells Sissoko and appoints Carver there will be rioting? SUPPORT THE TEAM MAN! CARVER'S ALREADY SAID BURNLEY RAN MORE THAN US!! GET A GRIP YA BASTAD Carver said that the physical data said that burnley ran more than us. I'm not sure I trust this 2nd hand information. I'd like to speak directly to the physical data before I can really believe that Burnley overran us. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AyeDubbleYoo Posted January 6, 2015 Share Posted January 6, 2015 Physical data doesn't lie. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest neesy111 Posted January 6, 2015 Share Posted January 6, 2015 Physical data doesn't lie. Meta-data does. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AyeDubbleYoo Posted January 6, 2015 Share Posted January 6, 2015 Physical data doesn't lie. Meta-data does. Exactly, that's not physical. I only vaguely know what I'm on about. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
DJ_NUFC Posted January 6, 2015 Share Posted January 6, 2015 SackPhysicalData.com Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SEMTEX Posted January 6, 2015 Share Posted January 6, 2015 I was pretty disappointed Physical Data wasn't on the Chronicle's CONTENDERS poll. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted January 6, 2015 Share Posted January 6, 2015 I was pretty disappointed Physical Data wasn't on the Chronicle's CONTENDERS poll. It's more compact, cheaper & not as hairy. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andybiotics Posted January 6, 2015 Share Posted January 6, 2015 That Hull anti-Pardew protest was one of the worst moments in our clubs history. The apathy in the crowd was just such a depressing sight. Thats the moment when I realised this clubs fans are as big of a problem as Ashley is. 95% of the NUFC fans that day just let Pardew get on with it and even booed the ones protesting. Pathetic. Sissoko out and Carver made permanent would get the same "riot" results. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kanj Posted January 6, 2015 Share Posted January 6, 2015 Who would then buy the club given they can't do anything with sponsorship ect? Guess that might be one sticking point, but although it may stop someone coming in to take over with a huge amount of shares, the profit the club makes would bring in buyers surely ? Maybe, but at a far lower buying price than you would get with possible lucrative sponsorship open to negotiate from new buyers. Any owner with would look at the kind of sponsorship money going around the Premier League and how its growing and drastically downgrade what they're willing to pay. Unless we're talking purely about the stadium adds and not shirts as well? In which case it wouldn't be quite as extreme a sticking point, but still would have a reasonably significant effect on what people are willing to pay. I mean looking at a strictly business stand point, I don't see how he couldn't just sign up long term management (of Retail through SD) and sponsorship or naming (with SD) on long term contracts, with high liquidated damages / termination costs and make them assumable contracts per float/sale of the club. I've seen similar done in different circumstances in the hotel industry - however buyers discount those long term contracts and your "buyer" pool diminishes drastically -- no upside or flexibility there. what I was saying above. Buyers will discount the value of the club if they don't see any bit of upside or ability to grow revenues through sponsorship and such. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest antz1uk Posted January 7, 2015 Share Posted January 7, 2015 can't find the joey barton thread so don't know if this is a huge giggs as it seems pretty old the way he's talking but just been tweeted this video of joey barton talking about llambias, wise and ashley https://www.facebook.com/video.php?v=762448253835629 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
brummie Posted January 7, 2015 Share Posted January 7, 2015 can't find the joey barton thread so don't know if this is a huge giggs as it seems pretty old the way he's talking but just been tweeted this video of joey barton talking about llambias, wise and ashley https://www.facebook.com/video.php?v=762448253835629 hmm, "they tried to fuck me when i was having a low time" You were in prison, Joey, how many people in normal walks of life do you think would still be employed whilst in prison? I take the point about the likes of Wise, Ashley and Lambias being cunts, but fuck me, Barton is exactly the sort of "me, me me" footballer that makes me want to start watching rugby instead. What a massive arsehole. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest antz1uk Posted January 7, 2015 Share Posted January 7, 2015 he's a pain in the arse like, there's always an agenda with him Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
buzza Posted January 7, 2015 Share Posted January 7, 2015 Irrelevant of whether Joey is a pric* or not, he is on the money about those three! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts