Hanshithispantz Posted June 15, 2014 Share Posted June 15, 2014 Really wouldn't drop Rooney, like. We need more goalscoring instinct through the middle and Sturridge & Rooney offer that better than anyone else in the squad, by a country mile. There's plenty of creativity, elsewhere, we just need to get the balance right. I wouldn't drop him either, he was horrible today like but our problem was our inability to break Italy down. Lallana and Barkley were just as ineffective. Sterling had his moments as did Welbeck and Sturridge. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
nufc4eva Posted June 15, 2014 Share Posted June 15, 2014 Really wouldn't drop Rooney, like. We need more goalscoring instinct through the middle and Sturridge & Rooney offer that better than anyone else in the squad, by a country mile. There's plenty of creativity, elsewhere, we just need to get the balance right. He is terrible at moment. we need Barkley, Sterling etc Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gallowgate Toon Posted June 15, 2014 Share Posted June 15, 2014 Really wouldn't drop Rooney, like. We need more goalscoring instinct through the middle and Sturridge & Rooney offer that better than anyone else in the squad, by a country mile. There's plenty of creativity, elsewhere, we just need to get the balance right. He is terrible at moment. we need Barkley, Sterling etc No, we need to empower one of the best goalscorers in the squad. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
toon25 Posted June 15, 2014 Share Posted June 15, 2014 Really wouldn't drop Rooney, like. We need more goalscoring instinct through the middle and Sturridge & Rooney offer that better than anyone else in the squad, by a country mile. There's plenty of creativity, elsewhere, we just need to get the balance right. Give the other guys a chance whilst the pressure is off, imo. Rooney flatters to deceive every time he's pulled on an England shirt. Pick players to fit the formation. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Prophet Posted June 15, 2014 Share Posted June 15, 2014 Positives: Plenty of pace and movement in the attack The scouse trio of Henderson, Sterling and Sturridge all had decent games We worked the ball well for the most part We were actually entertaining to watch for a change Negatives We switched off too frequently from set pieces Defensivery we looked incredibly vulnerable down the left The midfield balance didn't look right The final ball was too hit and miss Rooney and Gerrard were gash Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gallowgate Toon Posted June 15, 2014 Share Posted June 15, 2014 Really wouldn't drop Rooney, like. We need more goalscoring instinct through the middle and Sturridge & Rooney offer that better than anyone else in the squad, by a country mile. There's plenty of creativity, elsewhere, we just need to get the balance right. I wouldn't drop him either, he was horrible today like but our problem was our inability to break Italy down. Lallana and Barkley were just as ineffective. Sterling had his moments as did Welbeck and Sturridge. I'd just stick him in AM, for the next match, with the remit of being more of a second striker rather than a creator. We've got good ability in midfield so will still create. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robster Posted June 15, 2014 Share Posted June 15, 2014 You went a bit Japanese there Prophet. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ronaldo Posted June 15, 2014 Share Posted June 15, 2014 Stupid playing Rooney out wide. No reason you can't have a front 4 of Barkley, Sterling, Rooney and Sturridge. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hanshithispantz Posted June 15, 2014 Share Posted June 15, 2014 I don't think Gerrard was "piss poor" by any stretch of the imagination like. He was absolutely shite man You're talking shite. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JB Posted June 15, 2014 Share Posted June 15, 2014 Positives: Plenty of pace and movement in the attack The scouse trio of Henderson, Sterling and Sturridge all had decent games We worked the ball well for the most part We were actually entertaining to watch for a change Negatives We switched off too frequently from set pieces Defensivery we looked incredibly vulnerable down the left The midfield balance didn't look right The final ball was too hit and miss Rooney and Gerrard were gash Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Prophet Posted June 15, 2014 Share Posted June 15, 2014 It's easy to stay drop Rooney but he's still England's best player and more than capable of being a match winner. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ronaldo Posted June 15, 2014 Share Posted June 15, 2014 Gerrard was awful, man. As he usually is against this level of opposition. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
triggs Posted June 15, 2014 Share Posted June 15, 2014 I don't think Gerrard was "piss poor" by any stretch of the imagination like. He was absolutely shite man You're talking shite. I'm not. What did Gerrard do to positively affect England's game? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest TruToon94 Posted June 15, 2014 Share Posted June 15, 2014 It's easy to stay drop Rooney but he's still England's best player and more than capable of being a match winner. Exactly when and where has this ever happened for England in a major tournament in the last decade since 2004? He is not our best player and not a match winner at international level. Name me one example in a tournament since Euro 2004 he has done this? Exactly. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hanshithispantz Posted June 15, 2014 Share Posted June 15, 2014 I don't think Gerrard was "piss poor" by any stretch of the imagination like. He was absolutely shite man You're talking shite. I'm not. What did Gerrard do to positively affect England's game? What did he do negatively to affect England's game? He was sat deep and attempted to distribute the ball, like he was asked. I'm not really sure what he did to be considered shite tbh. He isn't Pirlo, I think we established that 2 years ago. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
KaKa Posted June 15, 2014 Share Posted June 15, 2014 Stupid playing Rooney out wide. No reason you can't have a front 4 of Barkley, Sterling, Rooney and Sturridge. Yup, Rooney out wide was just forced. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Prophet Posted June 15, 2014 Share Posted June 15, 2014 It's easy to stay drop Rooney but he's still England's best player and more than capable of being a match winner. Exactly when and where has this ever happened for England in a major tournament in the last decade since 2004? He is not our best player and not a match winner at international level. Name me one example in a tournament since Euro 2004 he has done this? Exactly. He hasn't but who has? He's still our best player. That's coming from someone that hates the scouse twat too. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hanshithispantz Posted June 15, 2014 Share Posted June 15, 2014 It's easy to stay drop Rooney but he's still England's best player and more than capable of being a match winner. Exactly when and where has this ever happened for England in a major tournament in the last decade since 2004? He is not our best player and not a match winner at international level. Name me one example in a tournament since Euro 2004 he has done this? Exactly. Horrific craic. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Prophet Posted June 15, 2014 Share Posted June 15, 2014 I think Columbia would.probably gave too.much for us in the last 16 like. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
themanupstairs Posted June 15, 2014 Share Posted June 15, 2014 Stupid playing Rooney out wide. No reason you can't have a front 4 of Barkley, Sterling, Rooney and Sturridge. This. This. This. This. This. This.This. This. This.This. This. This. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
triggs Posted June 15, 2014 Share Posted June 15, 2014 I don't think Gerrard was "piss poor" by any stretch of the imagination like. He was absolutely shite man You're talking shite. I'm not. What did Gerrard do to positively affect England's game? What did he do negatively to affect England's game? He was sat deep and attempted to distribute the ball, like he was asked. I'm not really sure what he did to be considered shite tbh. He isn't Pirlo, I think we established that 2 years ago. He barely touched the ball in a meaningful way. Do you not think that negatively affects the team? For a defensive midfielder he didn't win any ball, he let Marchisio in behind him loads of times Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AyeDubbleYoo Posted June 15, 2014 Share Posted June 15, 2014 The weakness of the 4-2-3-1 with England's players is that Gerrard does not have the legs to cover his fullback and the forward 4 aren't in a position to either. Not sure how it can be address except with another DM instead of Gerrard, but we don't really have one in the squad. The amount of times Baines was exposed was a bit scary. Enough positives overall though, especially Sturridge, Welbeck and Sterling. Should get enough points off the other two teams to progress. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest TruToon94 Posted June 15, 2014 Share Posted June 15, 2014 It's easy to stay drop Rooney but he's still England's best player and more than capable of being a match winner. Exactly when and where has this ever happened for England in a major tournament in the last decade since 2004? He is not our best player and not a match winner at international level. Name me one example in a tournament since Euro 2004 he has done this? Exactly. He hasn't but who has? He's still our best player. That's coming from someone that hates the scouse t*** too. Owen Hargreaves in 2006, Jermain Defoe in 2010. I don't give two shits what he does at a club level, at international level he's near the bottom of the pile for quality. Sterling is clearly our best player, the fact three Italians surrounded him every time proves that they thought this too. Compare Balotelli, who scored a much tougher chance. That's a match winner. Rooney can single handily lose us matches. Never seen him win us won internationally at a major tournament . Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hanshithispantz Posted June 15, 2014 Share Posted June 15, 2014 I don't think Gerrard was "piss poor" by any stretch of the imagination like. He was absolutely shite man You're talking shite. I'm not. What did Gerrard do to positively affect England's game? What did he do negatively to affect England's game? He was sat deep and attempted to distribute the ball, like he was asked. I'm not really sure what he did to be considered shite tbh. He isn't Pirlo, I think we established that 2 years ago. He barely touched the ball in a meaningful way. Do you not think that negatively affects the team? For a defensive midfielder he didn't win any ball, he let Marchisio in behind him loads of times He's not a "defensive midfielder" though, I don't think he can ever be expected to sht down his man. He was involved though and he rarely if ever wasted the ball. I think we need to look at the midfield as a whole but I'm not having it that Gerrard was individually shit like, he wasn't. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Prophet Posted June 15, 2014 Share Posted June 15, 2014 Owen Hargreaves a match winner? Aye why not? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts