Jump to content

2014 FIFA World Cup Brasil™ - Europe vs. America


Recommended Posts

Positives:

 

Plenty of pace and movement in the attack

The scouse trio of Henderson, Sterling and Sturridge all had decent games

We worked the ball well for the most part

We were actually entertaining to watch for a change

 

Negatives

 

We switched off too frequently from set pieces

Defensivery we looked incredibly vulnerable down the left

The midfield balance didn't look right

The final ball was too hit and miss

Rooney and Gerrard were gash

 

:thup:

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't think Gerrard was "piss poor" by any stretch of the imagination like.

He was absolutely shite man

You're talking shite.

I'm not. What did Gerrard do to positively affect England's game?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest TruToon94

It's easy to stay drop Rooney but he's still England's best player and more than capable of being a match winner.

 

Exactly when and where has this ever happened for England in a major tournament in the last decade since 2004? He is not our best player and not a match winner at international level. Name me one example in a tournament since Euro 2004 he has done this?

 

Exactly.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't think Gerrard was "piss poor" by any stretch of the imagination like.

He was absolutely shite man

You're talking shite.

I'm not. What did Gerrard do to positively affect England's game?

What did he do negatively to affect England's game?

 

He was sat deep and attempted to distribute the ball, like he was asked. I'm not really sure what he did to be considered shite tbh. He isn't Pirlo, I think we established that 2 years ago.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's easy to stay drop Rooney but he's still England's best player and more than capable of being a match winner.

 

Exactly when and where has this ever happened for England in a major tournament in the last decade since 2004? He is not our best player and not a match winner at international level. Name me one example in a tournament since Euro 2004 he has done this?

 

Exactly.

 

He hasn't but who has? He's still our best player.

 

That's coming from someone that hates the scouse twat too.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's easy to stay drop Rooney but he's still England's best player and more than capable of being a match winner.

 

Exactly when and where has this ever happened for England in a major tournament in the last decade since 2004? He is not our best player and not a match winner at international level. Name me one example in a tournament since Euro 2004 he has done this?

 

Exactly.

Horrific craic.
Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't think Gerrard was "piss poor" by any stretch of the imagination like.

He was absolutely shite man

You're talking shite.

I'm not. What did Gerrard do to positively affect England's game?

What did he do negatively to affect England's game?

 

He was sat deep and attempted to distribute the ball, like he was asked. I'm not really sure what he did to be considered shite tbh. He isn't Pirlo, I think we established that 2 years ago.

He barely touched the ball in a meaningful way. Do you not think that negatively affects the team? For a defensive midfielder he didn't win any ball, he let Marchisio in behind him loads of times

Link to post
Share on other sites

The weakness of the 4-2-3-1 with England's players is that Gerrard does not have the legs to cover his fullback and the forward 4 aren't in a position to either. Not sure how it can be address except with another DM instead of Gerrard, but we don't really have one in the squad. The amount of times Baines was exposed was a bit scary.

 

Enough positives overall though, especially Sturridge, Welbeck and Sterling. Should get enough points off the other two teams to progress.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest TruToon94

It's easy to stay drop Rooney but he's still England's best player and more than capable of being a match winner.

 

Exactly when and where has this ever happened for England in a major tournament in the last decade since 2004? He is not our best player and not a match winner at international level. Name me one example in a tournament since Euro 2004 he has done this?

 

Exactly.

 

He hasn't but who has? He's still our best player.

 

That's coming from someone that hates the scouse t*** too.

 

Owen Hargreaves in 2006, Jermain Defoe in 2010. I don't give two shits what he does at a club level, at international level he's near the bottom of the pile for quality. Sterling is clearly our best player, the fact three Italians surrounded him every time proves that they thought this too.

 

Compare Balotelli, who scored a much tougher chance. That's a match winner. Rooney can single handily lose us matches. Never seen him win us won internationally at a major tournament .

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't think Gerrard was "piss poor" by any stretch of the imagination like.

He was absolutely shite man

You're talking shite.

I'm not. What did Gerrard do to positively affect England's game?

What did he do negatively to affect England's game?

 

He was sat deep and attempted to distribute the ball, like he was asked. I'm not really sure what he did to be considered shite tbh. He isn't Pirlo, I think we established that 2 years ago.

He barely touched the ball in a meaningful way. Do you not think that negatively affects the team? For a defensive midfielder he didn't win any ball, he let Marchisio in behind him loads of times

He's not a "defensive midfielder" though, I don't think he can ever be expected to sht down his man. He was involved though and he rarely if ever wasted the ball. I think we need to look at the midfield as a whole but I'm not having it that Gerrard was individually shit like, he wasn't.
Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't think Gerrard was "piss poor" by any stretch of the imagination like.

He was absolutely shite man

You're talking shite.

I'm not. What did Gerrard do to positively affect England's game?

What did he do negatively to affect England's game?

 

He was sat deep and attempted to distribute the ball, like he was asked. I'm not really sure what he did to be considered shite tbh. He isn't Pirlo, I think we established that 2 years ago.

He barely touched the ball in a meaningful way. Do you not think that negatively affects the team? For a defensive midfielder he didn't win any ball, he let Marchisio in behind him loads of times

He's not a "defensive midfielder" though, I don't think he can ever be expected to sht down his man. He was involved though and he rarely if ever wasted the ball. I think we need to look at the midfield as a whole but I'm not having it that Gerrard was individually shit like, he wasn't.

Ok we'll agree to disagree

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest TruToon94

Owen Hargreaves a match winner? Aye why not?

 

He's not good and I didn't rate him. But 2006 he was undoubtedly our best player. People forget he won player of the tournament for us.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The weakness of the 4-2-3-1 with England's players is that Gerrard does not have the legs to cover his fullback and the forward 4 aren't in a position to either. Not sure how it can be address except with another DM instead of Gerrard, but we don't really have one in the squad. The amount of times Baines was exposed was a bit scary.

 

Enough positives overall though, especially Sturridge, Welbeck and Sterling. Should get enough points off the other two teams to progress.

 

Yeah, I think it's a role Jones could cover in certain games. We really did need someone with more defensive knowledge to plug some gaps.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The weakness of the 4-2-3-1 with England's players is that Gerrard does not have the legs to cover his fullback and the forward 4 aren't in a position to either. Not sure how it can be address except with another DM instead of Gerrard, but we don't really have one in the squad. The amount of times Baines was exposed was a bit scary.

 

Enough positives overall though, especially Sturridge, Welbeck and Sterling. Should get enough points off the other two teams to progress.

 

Really hope so, but I don't see it. The performance today could have been something to build on if there had been a positive result to go with it, but I don't think this team have the character/experience to bounce back from disappointment here. I could see the performance dipping badly against Uruguay. Tournament ends with :milner: on the pitch in a draw against Costa Rica.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The weakness of the 4-2-3-1 with England's players is that Gerrard does not have the legs to cover his fullback and the forward 4 aren't in a position to either. Not sure how it can be address except with another DM instead of Gerrard, but we don't really have one in the squad. The amount of times Baines was exposed was a bit scary.

 

Enough positives overall though, especially Sturridge, Welbeck and Sterling. Should get enough points off the other two teams to progress.

 

Yeah, I think it's a role Jonas could cover in certain games. We really did need someone with more defensive knowledge to plug some gaps.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...