relámpago blanco Posted December 2, 2016 Share Posted December 2, 2016 We would probably be better suited with Mitro up front now but it is tricky as Gayle is always likely to nick one. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Happinesstan Posted December 2, 2016 Share Posted December 2, 2016 Darlow making Nottingham look like Lilliput tonight. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest neesy111 Posted December 2, 2016 Share Posted December 2, 2016 Mitro for Gayle would probably be a good idea to make it stick. Ref would probably have him red carded for walking onto the pitch mind. Wrong, we need someone to chase every ball. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
sempuki Posted December 2, 2016 Share Posted December 2, 2016 Another forward coming on. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest firetotheworks Posted December 2, 2016 Share Posted December 2, 2016 The commentator just said "quite a turnaround if Forrest come from behind to win this game", wtf, it will hardly be a surprise. 2 pens and a 2 man advantage. Dat adversity. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
NUFC Posted December 2, 2016 Share Posted December 2, 2016 Shelvey kicked out, inside the box. No matter how big of a t*** Lansbury is, it´s still red and a penalty. Dummett barged down Lansbury from behind in a clear goal scoring opportunity. I get the siege mentality and all that, but I bet you most people supporting other football clubs will agree with the decisions. Now lets go out there, park the bus and get those 3 points. Would taste so f***ing good! Even if you think Dummett's was a pen, the new rule is that it's not also a red card. No. Not automatically a red card. Red is still entitled to send him off. You need to read the rules So do you.... Where a player commits an offence against an opponent within their own penalty area which denies an opponent an obvious goal-scoring opportunity and the referee awards a penalty kick, the offending player is cautioned unless: The offence is holding, pulling or pushing or The offending player does not attempt to play the ball or there is no possibility for the player making the challenge to play the ball or The offence is one which is punishable by a red card wherever it occurs on the field of play (e.g. serious foul play, violent conduct etc.) In all the above circumstances the player is sent off. That's last year's rule, it doesn't include the double punishment exclusion. Nope that's this years laws (I'm a ref myself) That was an accidental foul by dummett. If you don't believe that then you need your life checking out tbh. Nobody disagrees with that! You said the ref didn't know the laws, where actually he got it wrong. You said it's a red, which it's not. Its not automatically a red but still can be Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
shintonsghost Posted December 2, 2016 Share Posted December 2, 2016 you just know as a total kick in the fucking balls that their winner will come AFTER the 85th minute, you just know Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
sempuki Posted December 2, 2016 Share Posted December 2, 2016 If they don't win they should pack it in. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
sempuki Posted December 2, 2016 Share Posted December 2, 2016 Red card for Hayden surely ref. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
sbnufc Posted December 2, 2016 Share Posted December 2, 2016 Go 3-3-2 and win the game!!!!!1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TRon Posted December 2, 2016 Share Posted December 2, 2016 We'd have won this game comfortably if only there were competent refs in England. Even a defeat doesn't leave me too concerned. I think we might have to write off a few games tbh, the refs in this division are either being bought off or have gigantic chips on their shoulder. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest neesy111 Posted December 2, 2016 Share Posted December 2, 2016 Shelvey kicked out, inside the box. No matter how big of a t*** Lansbury is, it´s still red and a penalty. Dummett barged down Lansbury from behind in a clear goal scoring opportunity. I get the siege mentality and all that, but I bet you most people supporting other football clubs will agree with the decisions. Now lets go out there, park the bus and get those 3 points. Would taste so f***ing good! Even if you think Dummett's was a pen, the new rule is that it's not also a red card. No. Not automatically a red card. Red is still entitled to send him off. You need to read the rules So do you.... Where a player commits an offence against an opponent within their own penalty area which denies an opponent an obvious goal-scoring opportunity and the referee awards a penalty kick, the offending player is cautioned unless: The offence is holding, pulling or pushing or The offending player does not attempt to play the ball or there is no possibility for the player making the challenge to play the ball or The offence is one which is punishable by a red card wherever it occurs on the field of play (e.g. serious foul play, violent conduct etc.) In all the above circumstances the player is sent off. That's last year's rule, it doesn't include the double punishment exclusion. Nope that's this years laws (I'm a ref myself) That was an accidental foul by dummett. If you don't believe that then you need your life checking out tbh. Nobody disagrees with that! You said the ref didn't know the laws, where actually he got it wrong. You said it's a red, which it's not. It's like arguing with a woman. No, I've not once said it's a red. I said the ref had a choice, in response to you saying he didn't know the laws. Fine, fair enough. Well the other officials should tell him in that radio system they have. This standard of officiating is abysmal. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hanshithispantz Posted December 2, 2016 Share Posted December 2, 2016 Red that like Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlackandWhite Posted December 2, 2016 Share Posted December 2, 2016 If they don't win they should pack it in. For sure Even if we're one of the best in the league if you don't win at home to nine men you seriously need to f*** off to league one Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shearergol Posted December 2, 2016 Share Posted December 2, 2016 I'm still baffled by gouffran's booking as much as anything. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest firetotheworks Posted December 2, 2016 Share Posted December 2, 2016 We'd have won this game comfortably if only there were competent refs in England. Even a defeat doesn't leave me too concerned. I think we might have to write off a few games tbh, the refs in this division are either being bought off or have gigantic chips on their shoulder. They're just shit, it's not a conspiracy. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Parsley Posted December 2, 2016 Share Posted December 2, 2016 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shearergol Posted December 2, 2016 Share Posted December 2, 2016 Shelvey kicked out, inside the box. No matter how big of a t*** Lansbury is, it´s still red and a penalty. Dummett barged down Lansbury from behind in a clear goal scoring opportunity. I get the siege mentality and all that, but I bet you most people supporting other football clubs will agree with the decisions. Now lets go out there, park the bus and get those 3 points. Would taste so f***ing good! Even if you think Dummett's was a pen, the new rule is that it's not also a red card. No. Not automatically a red card. Red is still entitled to send him off. You need to read the rules So do you.... Where a player commits an offence against an opponent within their own penalty area which denies an opponent an obvious goal-scoring opportunity and the referee awards a penalty kick, the offending player is cautioned unless: The offence is holding, pulling or pushing or The offending player does not attempt to play the ball or there is no possibility for the player making the challenge to play the ball or The offence is one which is punishable by a red card wherever it occurs on the field of play (e.g. serious foul play, violent conduct etc.) In all the above circumstances the player is sent off. That's last year's rule, it doesn't include the double punishment exclusion. Nope that's this years laws (I'm a ref myself) That was an accidental foul by dummett. If you don't believe that then you need your life checking out tbh. Nobody disagrees with that! You said the ref didn't know the laws, where actually he got it wrong. You said it's a red, which it's not. It's like arguing with a woman. No, I've not once said it's a red. I said the ref had a choice, in response to you saying he didn't know the laws. Fine, fair enough. Well the other officials should tell him in that radio system they have. This standard of officiating is abysmal. Wasn't even a foul for me just to be clear on my thoughts ? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stifler Posted December 2, 2016 Share Posted December 2, 2016 We'd have won this game comfortably if only there were competent refs in England. Even a defeat doesn't leave me too concerned. I think we might have to write off a few games tbh, the refs in this division are either being bought off or have gigantic chips on their shoulder. They're just shit, it's not a conspiracy. Hmm, but they are always shit for us, not for the other team. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
sempuki Posted December 2, 2016 Share Posted December 2, 2016 Don't think we should attack too much - there's not many left to defend. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TRon Posted December 2, 2016 Share Posted December 2, 2016 We'd have won this game comfortably if only there were competent refs in England. Even a defeat doesn't leave me too concerned. I think we might have to write off a few games tbh, the refs in this division are either being bought off or have gigantic chips on their shoulder. They're just shit, it's not a conspiracy. Maybe we'll get some of the rancid decisions going in our favour second half of the season then. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest neesy111 Posted December 2, 2016 Share Posted December 2, 2016 Shelvey kicked out, inside the box. No matter how big of a t*** Lansbury is, it´s still red and a penalty. Dummett barged down Lansbury from behind in a clear goal scoring opportunity. I get the siege mentality and all that, but I bet you most people supporting other football clubs will agree with the decisions. Now lets go out there, park the bus and get those 3 points. Would taste so f***ing good! Even if you think Dummett's was a pen, the new rule is that it's not also a red card. No. Not automatically a red card. Red is still entitled to send him off. You need to read the rules So do you.... Where a player commits an offence against an opponent within their own penalty area which denies an opponent an obvious goal-scoring opportunity and the referee awards a penalty kick, the offending player is cautioned unless: The offence is holding, pulling or pushing or The offending player does not attempt to play the ball or there is no possibility for the player making the challenge to play the ball or The offence is one which is punishable by a red card wherever it occurs on the field of play (e.g. serious foul play, violent conduct etc.) In all the above circumstances the player is sent off. That's last year's rule, it doesn't include the double punishment exclusion. Nope that's this years laws (I'm a ref myself) That was an accidental foul by dummett. If you don't believe that then you need your life checking out tbh. Nobody disagrees with that! You said the ref didn't know the laws, where actually he got it wrong. You said it's a red, which it's not. Its not automatically a red but still can be Accidental foul though which it was despite the pathetic dive. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
U2 Posted December 2, 2016 Share Posted December 2, 2016 You just know Rafa will have a plan in case we do go behind Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shearergol Posted December 2, 2016 Share Posted December 2, 2016 Played vurn! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest neesy111 Posted December 2, 2016 Share Posted December 2, 2016 Shelvey kicked out, inside the box. No matter how big of a t*** Lansbury is, it´s still red and a penalty. Dummett barged down Lansbury from behind in a clear goal scoring opportunity. I get the siege mentality and all that, but I bet you most people supporting other football clubs will agree with the decisions. Now lets go out there, park the bus and get those 3 points. Would taste so f***ing good! Even if you think Dummett's was a pen, the new rule is that it's not also a red card. No. Not automatically a red card. Red is still entitled to send him off. You need to read the rules So do you.... Where a player commits an offence against an opponent within their own penalty area which denies an opponent an obvious goal-scoring opportunity and the referee awards a penalty kick, the offending player is cautioned unless: The offence is holding, pulling or pushing or The offending player does not attempt to play the ball or there is no possibility for the player making the challenge to play the ball or The offence is one which is punishable by a red card wherever it occurs on the field of play (e.g. serious foul play, violent conduct etc.) In all the above circumstances the player is sent off. That's last year's rule, it doesn't include the double punishment exclusion. Nope that's this years laws (I'm a ref myself) That was an accidental foul by dummett. If you don't believe that then you need your life checking out tbh. Nobody disagrees with that! You said the ref didn't know the laws, where actually he got it wrong. You said it's a red, which it's not. It's like arguing with a woman. No, I've not once said it's a red. I said the ref had a choice, in response to you saying he didn't know the laws. Fine, fair enough. Well the other officials should tell him in that radio system they have. This standard of officiating is abysmal. Wasn't even a foul for me just to be clear on my thoughts ? Agreed. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now