Jump to content

PIF and RB Sports & Media


Yorkie

Recommended Posts

The 200k loss per day was calculated by dividing the 70 million loss for year 22/23 by 365. It doesn't mean we are literally loosing 200k day by day - like 200k yesterday, 200k today.

Was just a typical journos headline.

Link to post
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Bally21 said:

The 200k loss per day was calculated by dividing the 70 million loss for year 22/23 by 365. It doesn't mean we are literally loosing 200k day by day - like 200k yesterday, 200k today.

Was just a typical journos headline.

Aye it's just timings of payments depending on when the PL pay out

Link to post
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, RodneyCisse said:

Did anyone say fresh cash?

 

 

 

Nothing new or unusual, it's the seventh time they've done that:

 

07/10/2021 - £89.4m

09/11/2021 - £38.5m

24/01/2022 - £40m

26/10/2022 - £70.4m

10/02/2023 - £57m

22/08/2023 - £60m

 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I see the latest vote on the new rules were unanimous today.

 

You're allowed to spend 85% of income.

Points deductions will continue to apply.

PSR will remain next season with a transition period.

Link to post
Share on other sites

59 minutes ago, The Prophet said:

I see the latest vote on the new rules were unanimous today.

 

You're allowed to spend 85% of income.

Points deductions will continue to apply.

PSR will remain next season with a transition period.

Wasn’t it the new automated VAR that was voted unanimously today ? Haven’t seen anything about the new FFP rule being unanimous.

Link to post
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, SUPERTOON said:

Wasn’t it the new automated VAR that was voted unanimously today ? Haven’t seen anything about the new FFP rule being unanimous.

 

Wrong thread, I just heard it on SSN. Could have been getting mixed up but they mentioned the final vote in June.

Link to post
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, The Prophet said:

 

Wrong thread, I just heard it on SSN. Could have been getting mixed up but they mentioned the final vote in June.

New FFP system is voted on fully in June, new VAR was also voted today.

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, SUPERTOON said:

Wasn’t it the new automated VAR that was voted unanimously today ? Haven’t seen anything about the new FFP rule being unanimous.

 

This was it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Dr.Spaceman said:

 

Why would us and several other clubs vote for that?

Your guess is as good as mine.  The fact that they’re simply mirroring UEFA’s rules puts me in the mind of ‘resistance is futile’.  What would be the point of the PL having different FFP rules?

 

Or perhaps our owners know of other changes coming?

 

Or perhaps … they’re not actually all that fussed about being hemmed-in.

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Shearergol said:

They certainly appear stricter. 

 

It's still basically spend based on income. 

 

If (it's a big if) they relax related party sponsorship and introduce a luxury tax of sorts, it's a win for us.

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, The Prophet said:

 

It's still basically spend based on income. 

 

If (it's a big if) they relax related party sponsorship and introduce a luxury tax of sorts, it's a win for us.

With no acceptable losses - it is stricter

 

edit: completely agree re ‘luxury tax’ element

 

 

Edited by TheBrownBottle

Link to post
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, TheBrownBottle said:

With no acceptable losses - it is stricter

 

edit: completely agree re ‘luxury tax’ element

 

 

 

 

Where have you got it from that there would be no acceptable losses?

 

The UEFA rules, which the PL will apparently mirror, have allowable losses of up to £78m over 3 years, which is slightly lower than the PL's current £115 over 3 years but it's not no losses. The likelihood is we've been working to the UEFA rules anyway, because we'll be aiming to be in Europe every year.

 

The devil is going to be in the detail of what we can get away with in terms of related party sponsorships.

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Jackie Broon said:

 

Where have you got it from that there would be no acceptable losses?

 

The UEFA rules, which the PL will apparently mirror, have allowable losses of up to £78m over 3 years, which is slightly lower than the PL's current £115 over 3 years but it's not no losses. The likelihood is we've been working to the UEFA rules anyway, because we'll be aiming to be in Europe every year.

 

The devil is going to be in the detail of what we can get away with in terms of related party sponsorships.

Losses to the accounts ledger - they’re not losses based on player wages & transfers.  The 70% of turnover rule doesn’t allow for going over that

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, TheBrownBottle said:

Losses to the accounts ledger - they’re not losses based on player wages & transfers.  The 70% of turnover rule doesn’t allow for going over that

Precisely obviously the details have been outlined, but I imagine the punishments are what matters, if they remain the same with immediate points deduction for breaches it’s game over. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...