Jump to content

Recommended Posts

18 minutes ago, Yorkie said:

I do think the Burn thing gets blown out of proportion. The manager isn't an imbecile; he'll be aware of the player's weaknesses but feels there are other benefits to playing him. He's a leader and his height gives him a unique strength both when dealing with crosses, as well a carrying a goal threat for us when we've no strikers. There's also the effect his being there has on Trippier's role.

 

As others have said, Livramento coming in won't suddenly stop there from being caverns of space between our midfield and defence; it's not as simple as just playing a quicker LB.

It’s about playing someone who never deserved to be dropped and was our best player when played. Also about trying something new instead of the same glaring flaws in each game.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It’d be a far different discussion if we were nearly fully fit and playing this way, yet still being 7th seems fine with me, in any circumstance. I didn’t spend 27 years of my life following club to lose my shit after finally being relevant and having fun again under this current run with Howe. 

 

 

Edited by Kanji

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, SUPERTOON said:

It’s about playing someone who never deserved to be dropped and was our best player when played. Also about trying something new instead of the same glaring flaws in each game.

I actually didn’t think Livramento looked particularly good in his last few starts 

Link to post
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Hanshithispantz said:

Howe has made mistakes (again keeping Burn on against Luton was moronic).

 

It's people consistently ignoring obvious things (like Burn dropping into a 3 and Trippier pushing on) to make the same points every game, and the absurd notion that Howe should be under pressure (not you) when he's doing no worse than over half of the managers in the league.

 

Tino is clearly a better fullback than Dan Burn, Howe would have dropped him months ago if he thought he could play the same role.

 

 

Burn dropping into a 3 means nothing though when you’re conceding goals for fun. Defending the player because he slots into a defensive system that doesn’t work, isn’t really defending the player….or the manager 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I genuinely don't believe there are many managers out there that would fare much better than Eddie right now, in these crazy circumstances. For example, I doubt Arteta would have us getting better results. That being said, there's certainly a frustration bubbling with the inflexibility to try a new formation for example, to cover our lack of midfield options. (Play 5 at the back etc). I'm giving him a pass this season. Yes I get annoyed at certain things, but he's more than earned enough good will.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, El Prontonise said:

 

Debatable whether it would be.

We'd just be replacing Miley with Livramento though wouldn't we? As I said earlier, despite our squad being horrific at the minute we're still better than most on recent form, it is possible all of the suggestions people are calling for might actually make us worse.

Link to post
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, TheBrownBottle said:

We don’t know what the target is.  My view at the start of the season was that 7th/8th would represent a decent campaign, and my opinion hasn’t changed.  Part of the issue is the lop-sided nature of the season creating recency bias.  

Not claiming to be itk but my mate is the football secretary, he gives absolutely nothing away but you get the occasional snippet when he drops something in conversation ?‍♂️ 

Link to post
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Kid Icarus said:

It will, it'll mean the player with the most assists in the league is the one who sits back. 

 

Why can't Tino play the same role as Burn and let Trippier push on when he wants to? 
I'd much rather have Tino as last man back with his recovery pace then any of our other defenders. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Ronaldo said:


It’s a bit of an overreaction granted but you can barely keep yours dry when anyone is critical of Howe on here. Surely you understand that people are going to be frustrated seeing the same glaring issues game after game to the extent we’re only 2 points ahead of Wolves?

 

I don't kick off at everyone being critical of Howe because some of the constructive criticism is perfectly reasonable. Some of it is complete nonsense though.

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, LordJake said:

Not claiming to be itk but my mate is the football secretary, he gives absolutely nothing away but you get the occasional snippet when he drops something in conversation ?‍♂️ 

Assistant football secretary you mean?

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, alexf said:

 

Why can't Tino play the same role as Burn and let Trippier push on when he wants to? 
I'd much rather have Tino as last man back with his recovery pace then any of our other defenders. 

Yep. You DO want Tino to be able to bomb forward though.

 

 

Edited by Collage

Link to post
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Collage said:

Yep. You DO want Tino to be able to bomb forward though.

 

 

Maybe we'll try something revolutionary like have both full backs able to go forward when the situation warrants it?

 

Seem to recall Trippier getting plenty involved going forward against Man U and Chelsea when Tino was at LB. Set up the Gordon goal against Man U.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...