João Pedro: NUFC "close-in" on transfer with negotiations at an advanced stage (Chronicle)

[Vaj]

Wrong thread! 
 

p.s. sign Pedro

 

 

Edited 5 hours ago by Vaj

[Checko]

C'mon peeps don't get your hopes up, Pedro's got Chelsea written all over him. He probably has dozens of Chelsea tattooes, learnt english by watching Made in Chelsea, wanks off to pictures of Chelsea Clinton and wants to move to West London so he can get the freshest Chelsea buns in the country. Bastard's playing us, revenge for bailing on him before..

[KaKa]

[RUHRLYASLEEVESUP]

Makams be hijacking this one I reckon

 

was good while it lasted 

 

Time move on 

[GWN]

[AyeDubbleYoo]

Monday I reckon. 

[JT24]

 

[Vaj]

Chelsea 

[Solitude20]

2 minutes ago, JT24 said:

 

If it’s true that we only have 125m to spend, then getting Joao Pedro for 60m and a RW for 55m leaves us with nothing for Trafford and a defender. 
 

I think we can realistically only afford two out of those four if we want players who can truly improve the starting lineup.

[Bunk Moreland]

4 minutes ago, Solitude20 said:

If it’s true that we only have 125m to spend, then getting Joao Pedro for 60m and a RW for 55m leaves us with nothing for Trafford and a defender. 
 

I think we can realistically only afford two out of those four if we want players who can truly improve the starting lineup.

 

He appears to have removed the £125m figure and changed it to "with a certain amount to spend"  

[Joelinton7]

Said he removed it cause our fans were giving him grief about it, whatever that means. 

[BennyBlanco]

Chelsea. So that’s that one dead then. Why even bother when they are basically just allowed to stock pile players and rotate their entire starting 11 every transfer window. The premier leagues allowing their acrobatics in the accountancy department is pretty galling too. If we tried something similar there’d be a transfer limit imposed and forensic accountants dispatched within a week.

[BennyBlanco]

1 minute ago, Joelinton7 said:

Said he removed it cause our fans were giving him grief about it, whatever that means. 

 

He’s notoriously thin skinned. Banned a raft of fans that year when he was caught hiding in the bushes outside the training ground😂

[Bunk Moreland]

1 minute ago, Joelinton7 said:

Said he removed it cause our fans were giving him grief about it, whatever that means. 

 

Fucking hell 

[Bunk Moreland]

In the video he says Chelsea like him and are "having conversations because they like Joao Pedro" while we are actively working on the deal

 

 

Edited 3 hours ago by Bunk Moreland

[Scoot]

13 minutes ago, Bunk Moreland said:

 

He appears to have removed the £125m figure and changed it to "with a certain amount to spend"  

 

Was just about to post, absolutely no one apart from those within the club know what we have to spend. 

[Rafalove]

Fuck Chelsea.

[nufc4eva]

Just go spend 200m and worry about the psr next season. Getting Trafford, Elanga, Pedro and a defender sets us up for a few seasons and should allow us to then build underneath the squad with upcoming players/academy and look to strengthen with 1 or 2 each year. Would have a young first 11 overall and potential for profit on quite a few if needed to next few years

[Scoot]

5 minutes ago, BennyBlanco said:

 

He’s notoriously thin skinned. Banned a raft of fans that year when he was caught hiding in the bushes outside the training ground😂

 

What? 

[nufc4eva]

Just go spend 200m and worry about the psr next season. Getting Trafford, Elanga, Pedro and a defender sets us up for a few seasons and should allow us to then build underneath the squad with upcoming players/academy and look to strengthen with 1 or 2 each year. Would have a young first 11 overall and potential for profit on quite a few if needed to next few years

[janpawel]

Don't want to jinx it, but honestly sounds like Chelsea are just being put in these conversations by Brighton to bump up his price 

 

All the same vague stuff about Chelsea being interested 

[The Prophet]

Bid made during the week? This has probably moved on a fair bit since then, for better or for worse.

 

 

Edited 2 hours ago by The Prophet

[Joelinton7]

Are we the only team that has a bogey team for the transfer market? Fuck off Chelsea, go and sell a B and B to fund some 18 year old from Campeonato Brasileiro Série C just so you can loan him out for 7 years of an 8 year contract before selling them back to Big Joe’s granda’s Emu farm for £80m

[Bunk Moreland]

What position would Chelsea even want him for? Surely he'd be on the bench there

[The Prophet]

20 minutes ago, BennyBlanco said:

Chelsea. So that’s that one dead then. Why even bother when they are basically just allowed to stock pile players and rotate their entire starting 11 every transfer window. The premier leagues allowing their acrobatics in the accountancy department is pretty galling too. If we tried something similar there’d be a transfer limit imposed and forensic accountants dispatched within a week.

 

That's the spirit.