khay Posted February 1 Share Posted February 1 Aye, was just getting back up to speed last couple of games as well. Hopefully Wilson/Barnes back to give us some options and let Isak rest. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Coffee_Johnny Posted February 1 Share Posted February 1 10 minutes ago, Ikon said: Im pretty sure Isak is out for at least a month. You could see it in his face. He’s had this problem for a while so I’m certain he knows his body by now and that it’s not just a game or two. Having said this, I hope I’m brutallly wrong, but I doubt it… Impressively specific reading of the non verbals! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joelinton7 Posted February 2 Share Posted February 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Turnbull2000 Posted February 2 Share Posted February 2 I'd honestly rather just leave him out at this stage. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mondonewc Posted February 2 Share Posted February 2 1 minute ago, Joelinton7 said: https://x.com/nufc/status/1753353360449695954?s=46&t=DcLbGwd6hoDY9gGMy-ZgEw You fucking love to see it! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Geogaddi Posted February 2 Share Posted February 2 No point in risking him at home to Luton . Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aiston Posted February 2 Share Posted February 2 38 minutes ago, Joelinton7 said: Taking advice from our medical team is a dangerous game Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
1964 Posted February 2 Share Posted February 2 That's him out till 2035 then Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
pedro111 Posted February 2 Share Posted February 2 Bring back the bucket of water and sponge I say. Back in the day the fear of the sponge cleared up our injuries real quick. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mikky Posted February 2 Share Posted February 2 36 minutes ago, Geogaddi said: No point in risking him at home to Luton . Yep - bloody ridiculous Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AyeDubbleYoo Posted February 2 Share Posted February 2 By that logic you may as well get rid of fitness assessments and just rest everyone with any kind of niggle. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest reefatoon Posted February 2 Share Posted February 2 (edited) 5 minutes ago, AyeDubbleYoo said: By that logic you may as well get rid of fitness assessments and just rest everyone with any kind of niggle. Aye, let’s potentially risk getting three points from one of our easier home games, just to be on the safe side. Edited February 2 by reefatoon Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Geogaddi Posted February 2 Share Posted February 2 (edited) 6 minutes ago, AyeDubbleYoo said: By that logic you may as well get rid of fitness assessments and just rest everyone with any kind of niggle. Luton at home is a game I would expect us to win without Isak , why risk him in a game we don't need him when we know how injury plagued he has been since we signed him. It's a case of looking at the bigger picture , don't play him let him recover from whatever slight injury he has and he be good to go next week in a game we will need him in. Rushing players back from injury this season hasn't worked for us at all. Edited February 2 by Geogaddi Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shearergol Posted February 2 Share Posted February 2 "We thought originally that it wasn't too bad, and were hopeful he would be back for Luton. On further inspection is appears that he's dead" Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
WilliamPS Posted February 2 Share Posted February 2 Great news - what a bunch of doom mongers in here Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scoot Posted February 2 Share Posted February 2 Great news if he's fine for tomorrow. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aiston Posted February 2 Share Posted February 2 Our record on bringing players back that supposedly were fit enough, only to backfire, is pretty fucking shit this season. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
huss9 Posted February 2 Share Posted February 2 if there's nowt on the scan it may be worth giving him a run out. may be more to do with his confifence. having a normal scan may have reassured him. he's probabaly been told not to take any risks if he feels a twinge and ask to come off. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ginola14 Posted February 2 Share Posted February 2 the idea that we simply roll over an in-form PL team without a recognised striker on top of all other injuries seems a bit mad. they've already beaten us once this season ffs if he's fit he should play imo Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
khay Posted February 2 Share Posted February 2 With Murphy back we can always start with Gordon/movement up top and have Isak on later if not quite 100%. Be good when Barnes and Wilson back too. Man would have be in the fight for 4th if everyone was fit. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted February 2 Share Posted February 2 (edited) 1 hour ago, Turnbull2000 said: I'd honestly rather just leave him out at this stage. I'd be happy enough for him to be on the bench and go Miggy left, Murphy right and Gordon central. Get Miley a bit further forward to support more. Edited February 2 by Optimistic Nut Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mouldy_uk Posted February 2 Share Posted February 2 1 hour ago, Aiston said: Taking advice from our medical team is a dangerous game Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Erikse Posted February 2 Share Posted February 2 (edited) 1 hour ago, reefatoon said: Aye, let’s potentially risk getting three points from one of our easier home games, just to be on the safe side. Wouldn't be the first time that we decided to start a player who shouldn't. Why did Pep "risk losing" to us by putting De Bruyne on the bench? He had been injury free for a good while at that point. He was one of their very best players available. When did being careful with a player whos had a muscle injury stop being a reasonable thing to do? If you think leaving out Isak for one game is bad, imagine having him being out for several games. We would be "risking points" for way more than 1 game if he gets injured. Obviously it's up to the medical team and Howe to assess the injury, so hopefully they make the right decision.. Edited February 2 by Erikse Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ikon Posted February 2 Share Posted February 2 1 hour ago, AyeDubbleYoo said: By that logic you may as well get rid of fitness assessments and just rest everyone with any kind of niggle. Well, in Isaks case it’s not just a niggle is it? He’s had problems on and off with his groin for a while. I’ve had groin problems too and if there’s a “niggle” now it’s not suddenly gonna be bulletproof a week after. Groin problems need to be very carefully used and it’s a pain in the arse to get rid of. He might be able to play say 45-70 minutes without too much pain but it will only push the problem forward and make it a bigger one if not healed or adressen correctly and carefully. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kanji Posted February 2 Share Posted February 2 Leading up to his injury he was running around fine then walking and then just went down. I imagine the rule with him is if he feels any bit of pain go down and get it checked. Which they did. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now