Sandro Tonali - Spurs have £80m bid rejected by NUFC (SSN)

[TRC]

5 minutes ago, Conjo said:

Time to pop a happy pill TRC. Fucking hell, the whimpering defeatism is hard to read.

You should see me in the Wissa thread. The King is back

[Earp]

Just now, TRC said:

Fair, this forum was pretty bad though 

Agree which personally I think has been OTT. 

[Jackie Broon]

14 minutes ago, r0cafella said:

The wages plus the amortisation would ruin us tbh. Would be 30m a year + to the bottom line. 

 

If we get £90m for Tonali the net amortisation would be effectively 0 for the next three years, new five contract after three years and it would be around £10m a year after that. In terms of wages, Tonali's wage will be off the bill so it wouldn't ruin us.

 

 

Edited 19 hours ago by Jackie Broon

[TRC]

4 minutes ago, r0cafella said:

Id be floored if we spent so much on one player this time like. I don't expect us to spend more than 60m euro on a single player this window personally. 

I don’t mean to get him, I mean just get the dominos rolling so we know where we stand and show that we are actually serious.

[Viana]

If I've learned anything about Romano it's that he's used as a vehicle to apply pressure. 

 

If they aren't willing to get close to the price tag of £100m we're under no obligation to do the deal. 

[TRC]

Just now, Viana said:

If I've learned anything about Romano it's that he's used as a vehicle to apply pressure. 

 

If they aren't willing to get close to the price tag of £100m we're under no obligation to do the deal. 

None of this is from Romano though, he’s just repeating it. We can hate on Romano but Spurs want him and are willing to pay as they know they have to go above and beyond after missing out on Eze, MGW and Semenyo last summer.

 

its why they went mental for Van Hecke

[Optimistic Nut]

8 minutes ago, Earp said:

Never heard this during a

match. Always supportive 

 

Plenty stick on here. Another elite player gone. 

[Shays Given Tim Flowers]

1 hour ago, Rich said:

If Spurs don’t get gazumped, I’ll be amazed, it’s following the exact playbook so far.

We’re probably paying Romano.

[timeEd32]

29 minutes ago, TRC said:

The same fans that slagged him off all year despite being stuck in a rigid system that didn’t adapt and a club that fell apart from the top down?

He’s been mediocre since at least December. He’s a big reason we had the season we did, not a passenger on the ride.

[TRC]

Just now, timeEd32 said:

He’s been mediocre since at least December. He’s a big reason we had the season we did, not a passenger on the ride.

The entire team were mediocre apart from Bruno and that suggests a systemic problem.

 

 

[r0cafella]

24 minutes ago, Jackie Broon said:

 

If we get £90m for Tonali the net amortisation would be effectively 0 for the next three years, new five contract after three years and it would be around £10m a year after that. In terms of wages, Tonali's wage will be off the bill so it wouldn't ruin us.

 

 

 

Im not sure Tonalis book value and if Milan have a piece of the profit but let's assume we book 60m profit. Anderson is 120m minimum. We'd also need to pay Anderson twice what we currently pay Tonali too. 

 

I don't see how this works tbh. 

[TRC]

I don’t see why everyone keeps mentioning Anderson. He is going for 120m and will go to a top top club, we are selling our best players, ditched him once and finished 12th.

[John P]

9 minutes ago, TRC said:

I don’t see why everyone keeps mentioning Anderson. He is going for 120m and will go to a top top club, we are selling our best players, ditched him once and finished 12th.

Yep. Even if finances wouldn’t be an issue, I’m not sure Anderson would want to come back here. He (quite rightly) should have his sights set on a better team than us at the minute 

[Super Duper Branko Strupar]

1 hour ago, TRC said:

They won a trophy and had an off season. Same could be said about us but here he gets 250k a week and a chance to play for a good manager

 

You're such a shit fan

[Magpie Mover]

1 hour ago, AyeDubbleYoo said:

 

Spurs that have been a basket case for at least a couple of years?

 

Spurs that have refound ambition at the same time that we are losing ours.

[mush]

33 minutes ago, TRC said:

I don’t see why everyone keeps mentioning Anderson. He is going for 120m and will go to a top top club, we are selling our best players, ditched him once and finished 12th.

 

Also, I don't think selling players, then buying them back for near £100m more a couple of years later, is the soundest business model.

 

I could be wrong though, I'm not a businessman 

 

 

Edited 18 hours ago by mush

[Jackie Broon]

27 minutes ago, TRC said:

I don’t see why everyone keeps mentioning Anderson. He is going for 120m and will go to a top top club, we are selling our best players, ditched him once and finished 12th.

 

Because he is a top player who would possibly sign for us, give his all for us and would potentially transform our team.

 

There is no other player out there that can be said of. Other top players wouldn't sign for us even if we could afford them and we could easily spunk £120m on a couple of players who don't perform, care or just see us as a stepping stone to better things.

 

What he potentially offers  us is unique and priceless.

[GEFAFWISP]

Knew he'd be away when his wife didn't think the RVI could handle a child birth and went to London instead. #PIFOUT

[Kid Icarus]

5 minutes ago, GEFAFWISP said:

Knew he'd be away when his wife didn't think the RVI could handle a child birth and went to London instead. #PIFOUT

They're not wrong like, partners aren't allowed to stay so women are just on the maternity ward on their own with fairly limited support. We chose Cramlington for our second because of that policy the RVI has.

 

 

Edited 18 hours ago by Kid Icarus

[STM]

4 minutes ago, Kid Icarus said:

They're not wrong like, partners aren't allowed to stay so women are just on the maternity ward on their own with fairly limited support. We chose Cramlington for our second because of that policy the RVI has.

 

 

 

 

Is that the case? I was allowed in back in 13. Cramlington is way better like. Although I suspect Tonali goes private anyway.

[TRC]

47 minutes ago, Super Duper Branko Strupar said:

 

You're such a shit fan

Sorry pal

[TRC]

35 minutes ago, Jackie Broon said:

 

Because he is a top player who would possibly sign for us, give his all for us and would potentially transform our team.

 

There is no other player out there that can be said of. Other top players wouldn't sign for us even if we could afford them and we could easily spunk £120m on a couple of players who don't perform, care or just see us as a stepping stone to better things.

 

What he potentially offers  us is unique and priceless.

Howay man. 120m and 350k a week he’s not choosing us over that 

[GEFAFWISP]

28 minutes ago, Kid Icarus said:

They're not wrong like, partners aren't allowed to stay so women are just on the maternity ward on their own with fairly limited support. We chose Cramlington for our second because of that policy the RVI has.

 

 

 

Wasn't the case last year or in 2022, you been feeding Ms. Tonali lies again?

[Jackie Broon]

1 hour ago, r0cafella said:

Im not sure Tonalis book value and if Milan have a piece of the profit but let's assume we book 60m profit. Anderson is 120m minimum. We'd also need to pay Anderson twice what we currently pay Tonali too. 

 

I don't see how this works tbh. 

 

My back of a fag packet working out is that Tonali's remaining amortisation will be about £23m total at £7m per year

 

So if we sell him for £90m that's a profit of £67m, which would be spread over three years at £22.3m and also a £7m per year reduction in amortisation.

 

If Anderson costs us £120m that's £24m per year amortisation, for the first three years we'd actually be in the black in terms of amortisation to the tune of £5.3m per year.

 

 

Edited 17 hours ago by Jackie Broon

[r0cafella]

3 minutes ago, Jackie Broon said:

 

My back of a fag packet working out is that Tonali's remaining amortisation will be about £23m total at £7m per season

 

So if we sell him for £90m that's a profit of £67m, which would be spread over three years at £22.3m and also a £7m per year reduction in amortisation.

 

If Anderson costs us £120m that's £24m per year amortisation, for the first three years we'd actually be in the black in terms of amortisation to the tune of £5.3m per year.

Plus Andersons wage increase over Tonali plus your now Making Anderson the highest paid player so you better prepare Bruno's new deal as well. 

 

You also have to consider our new front of shirt sponsor is paying us less and we don't have any European money this year. 

 

Id love him back personally, but I don't see it as feasible.