Jump to content

NUFC Transfer Rumours


Guest

Recommended Posts

10 minutes ago, andycap said:

It's very short sighted by the club if they think we can get away with no more injuries. We get three back end of January but could take three to four games to get upto speed. I'd get in three loans with no option to pad the squad and give the three coming back time to recover properly. 

 

 

 

We seem deadset on gambling on avoiding short term pain for long term FFP gain. I do think we will bring at least a couple of players in though, even if they are loans.

Link to post
Share on other sites

54 minutes ago, gbandit said:

Happens to fast bowlers though mainly right? Due to the bowling action? Not the type of area of the body that should be particularly at risk in football, no?


Yep spot on - so quite an unusual injury for a footballer to get - sadly one of those you have to get right before making a comeback

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, sushimonster85 said:

Willock, Barnes, Anderson, & Wilson should all be back by the end of the transfer window, or in other words they're all unavavailable for another 2 league games at most. Likely having some impact on what we do. 

Barnes is literally like a new signing. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, sushimonster85 said:

Willock, Barnes, Anderson, & Wilson should all be back by the end of the transfer window, or in other words they're all unavavailable for another 2 league games at most. Likely having some impact on what we do. 


Not sure they will be. Willock has been fucked all season and had no pre-season. 
 

Barnes’ return just keeps getting pushed back. Not even trained with the squad yet since the injury, has he? 
 

Wilson is made of porcelain. 
 

Anderson we have heard sod all about. But some murmurings that the injury is taking longer to heal than first thought.
 

Throw in the lads that have come back recently have all looked miles off the pace and perhaps rushed back due to our current plight. Then I’m not sure relying on these four is the answer.  

Link to post
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, andycap said:

It's very short sighted by the club if they think we can get away with no more injuries. We get three back end of January but could take three to four games to get upto speed. I'd get in three loans with no option to pad the squad and give the three coming back time to recover properly. 

 

 

 

By time to recover properly you mean until the start of next season? Because unless I’m grossly mistaken our squad registered numbers do not allow the addition of three additional first team players without taking the same number out.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, Geordie Ahmed said:

According to The Times we are favourites to sign Guirassy, who has a £15m release clause

 

Would be a no brainer at that price 

We should, but we'd probably rather spend $60m on Connor Gallagher 

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Geordie Ahmed said:

According to The Times we are favourites to sign Guirassy, who has a £15m release clause

 

Would be a no brainer at that price 

If that is the release clause then we should be gunning for that this window 

Link to post
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, Unbelievable said:

By time to recover properly you mean until the start of next season? Because unless I’m grossly mistaken our squad registered numbers do not allow the addition of three additional first team players without taking the same number out.

De-register Tonali, Manquillo and Gillespie and you’re sorted.

 

Although probably a little iffy de-registering one of the keepers whilst Pope’s out.

Link to post
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Geordie Ahmed said:

According to The Times we are favourites to sign Guirassy, who has a £15m release clause

 

Would be a no brainer at that price 

No thank you. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

We'd only go for him if Wilson was to leave surely? Can he play anywhere else or just CF?

Link to post
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, SAK said:

Why the no. Isak and Wilson are pretty injury prone?

It’s such a short term move and a bad use of money. He’s 27 having one hot streak in a league renowned for poor defending. We have way less games lumped together in the second half of the season. 
 

Are you convinced we can get our money back for him if he comes in and flops? If so go for it. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hell, for that price if he comes in, does a Cisse, gets us into Europe and we get out money back or a bit more in the summer, brilliant. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...