AyeDubbleYoo Posted 5 hours ago Share Posted 5 hours ago I thought it was a smart signing for a Burn successor and a squad place. Which I guess it might still be in the long term. But at the moment he looks rubbish, although I do think he made a goal-saving block at one point. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andy84 Posted 5 hours ago Share Posted 5 hours ago Thought he got slightly better, tough to come in like that. Won’t judge him yet Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mazzy Posted 5 hours ago Share Posted 5 hours ago Unfortunately his poor marking is the reason we lost that. Conceding so early on gave them a huge amount of confidence and something to play for. It's a really bad mistake on his behalf. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
McDog Posted 5 hours ago Share Posted 5 hours ago That marking was conference league level on the first goal. That said, maybe they keep him as a LB and emergency CB. Not sure the wages he's on. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Theregulars Posted 5 hours ago Share Posted 5 hours ago Not good enough Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
huss9 Posted 5 hours ago Share Posted 5 hours ago cannit decide if he worse on their first goal or their second. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ExiledGeordie Posted 5 hours ago Share Posted 5 hours ago 9 minutes ago, McDog said: That marking was conference league level on the first goal. That said, maybe they keep him as a LB and emergency CB. Not sure the wages he's on. Hes a on fair chunk by all accounts. I don’t think he should be completely written off even after that though. Agreed it was very concerning however. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
huss9 Posted 5 hours ago Share Posted 5 hours ago 1 minute ago, ExiledGeordie said: Hes a on fair chunk by all accounts. I don’t think he should be completely written off even after that though. Agreed it was very concerning however. just so casual on each of their goals. no aggression or intelligence at all. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The College Dropout Posted 5 hours ago Share Posted 5 hours ago 1 minute ago, ExiledGeordie said: Hes a on fair chunk by all accounts. I don’t think he should be completely written off even after that though. Agreed it was very concerning however. I agree with this. I wasn’t high on the signing. Nothing from the eye test or stats excited me and he’s been worse than I even expected. They play different positions but this guy is meant to be the Lascelles/Krafth replacement right? Couldn’t lace their boots on his performances so far. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The College Dropout Posted 5 hours ago Share Posted 5 hours ago 2 minutes ago, huss9 said: just so casual on each of their goals. no aggression or intelligence at all. For a Howe player you would expect at least the aggression. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ExiledGeordie Posted 5 hours ago Share Posted 5 hours ago (edited) 3 minutes ago, huss9 said: just so casual on each of their goals. no aggression or intelligence at all. Yeah it was strange wasn’t it, he didn’t look comfortable on the ball or anything and almost gave the ball away early on. When he’s played before he’s looked a physical presence at least and solid. Was kind of floating about without doing anything. Edited 5 hours ago by ExiledGeordie Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AyeDubbleYoo Posted 5 hours ago Share Posted 5 hours ago 1 minute ago, The College Dropout said: I agree with this. I wasn’t high on the signing. Nothing from the eye test or stats excited me and he’s been worse than I even expected. They play different positions but this guy is meant to be the Lascelles/Krafth replacement right? Couldn’t lace their boots on his performances so far. Think he's intended to be the replacement for Burn as backup to Botman and desperation backup at LB. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The College Dropout Posted 5 hours ago Share Posted 5 hours ago 8 minutes ago, AyeDubbleYoo said: Think he's intended to be the replacement for Burn as backup to Botman and desperation backup at LB. He’s meant to be an upgrade though surely? I don’t see it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AyeDubbleYoo Posted 5 hours ago Share Posted 5 hours ago Just now, The College Dropout said: He’s meant to be an upgrade though surely? I don’t see it. Not sure, probably about the same as Burn but younger and available cheap. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr.Spaceman Posted 5 hours ago Share Posted 5 hours ago (edited) Dan Burn is a much better player than Lloyd Kelly Edited 5 hours ago by Dr.Spaceman Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The College Dropout Posted 5 hours ago Share Posted 5 hours ago 3 minutes ago, AyeDubbleYoo said: Not sure, probably about the same as Burn but younger and available cheap. I would assume he’s earning more money than Dan though. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AyeDubbleYoo Posted 4 hours ago Share Posted 4 hours ago Like I said, Kelly looks bad so far, I was just saying he was signed as a long-term squad option who could cover LCB and LB in the same way Burn does. But not start too much in either position. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sempiternal Posted 4 hours ago Share Posted 4 hours ago His defending for the first goal is absolutely pathetic. Really really bad Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kanj Posted 3 hours ago Share Posted 3 hours ago (edited) God I miss Krafth and Jamaal….and Botman. And Pauly D. Edited 3 hours ago by Kanj Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheBrownBottle Posted 2 hours ago Share Posted 2 hours ago His positioning is abysmal, as bad as I’ve seen in a long time in a B&W shirt. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now