El Prontonise Posted January 4 Share Posted January 4 3 minutes ago, Smal said: their team is still pretty strong really It's not except upfront. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AyeDubbleYoo Posted January 4 Share Posted January 4 3 minutes ago, Lush Vlad said: This. I thought there was absolutely no chance. Then yesterday Howe mentioned he had played 3 games, I thought it was just the one. He was also certainly hinting at him starting. Was giving a bit away by his standards of lying/saying fuck all. If he’s in full training and played 3 practice games then he’s as ready as you realistically can be. Might’ve preferred to bring him on for a half mind. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
leffe186 Posted January 4 Share Posted January 4 10 minutes ago, PRL said: Spurs seem to be shitting it about legs in the middle, playing those who will put the yards in. Surprised Bissouma dropped though He’s been ill too apparently. We’re not playing those who will put the yards in, we’re playing the ones who are able to play . Not much choice. The bench is hilarious. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
El Prontonise Posted January 4 Share Posted January 4 Nothing beats competitive games for match fitness. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AyeDubbleYoo Posted January 4 Share Posted January 4 1 minute ago, Lush Vlad said: Could be illness. But Son has been crap by his standards this season. Maddison doesn’t always start. Maybe Ange wants decent options off the bench so they don’t get worse as the game goes on. Difficult to start Maddison without both Sarr and Bissouma because you just get overrun by our midfield. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ronson333 Posted January 4 Share Posted January 4 (edited) 2 minutes ago, Weezertron said: Kelly is going to be one of those players we find it very hard to get off the books. Buying average players on frees, giving them high wages, is daft. That’s why I was glad we didn’t get Tosin, I feel they were going to be our new Jeff Hendrick and Jamal Lewis, but on much higher wages! Edited January 4 by Ronson333 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
KetsbaiaIsBald Posted January 4 Share Posted January 4 Just now, Displayname said: Botman RCB would mean only one change, so that is most certainly what we are going to see. that was my first guess. But maybe they see Burn as more versatile and/or give Botman the easiest way back into the team in his natural position. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AyeDubbleYoo Posted January 4 Share Posted January 4 1 minute ago, El Prontonise said: It's not except upfront. It’s just Kulu, Johnson and Solanke really. Enough to hurt us but hopefully we can dominate the supply of the ball to them. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Menace Posted January 4 Share Posted January 4 Kelly had a poor game against West Ham but he's mostly been what was expected - a decent backup defender on a free. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
leffe186 Posted January 4 Share Posted January 4 12 minutes ago, Nobody said: No Forster for them is a disappointment. you have no idea. Austin and Whiteman have barely played a proper game in their careers. There’s a reason Forster was our backup. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Holloway Posted January 4 Share Posted January 4 We should be swarming all over these from the off, get a nice 2 goal cush Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mouldy_uk Posted January 4 Share Posted January 4 Great to have him back 2-3 victory incoming Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mikky Posted January 4 Share Posted January 4 15 minutes ago, KetsbaiaIsBald said: I wonder who will be the RCB? I would have thought Botman Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AyeDubbleYoo Posted January 4 Share Posted January 4 1 minute ago, Ronson333 said: That’s why I was glad we didn’t get Tosin, I feel they were going to be our new Jeff Hendrick and Jamal Lewis, but on much higher wages! Kelly is the LCB and LB depth though, he’s just probably not trusted on the other side and we don’t want to move Burn. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AyeDubbleYoo Posted January 4 Share Posted January 4 1 minute ago, Mikky said: I would have thought Botman Definitely, we won’t move Burn. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lush Vlad Posted January 4 Share Posted January 4 1 minute ago, leffe186 said: you have no idea. Austin and Whiteman have barely played a proper game in their careers. There’s a reason Forster was our backup. Whilst he is shit with the ball at his feet. Forster has been making some decent stops from what I’ve seen? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
geordie_b Posted January 4 Share Posted January 4 Weeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeevvvvvveeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee got Bruno in the middle... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SUPERTOON Posted January 4 Share Posted January 4 I’m actually more nervous having seen the lineups tbh. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mazzy Posted January 4 Share Posted January 4 That's still a very decent Spurs team. Obviously the backline is unusual and the keeper is an unknown but this won't be a walk over. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Displayname Posted January 4 Share Posted January 4 2 minutes ago, KetsbaiaIsBald said: that was my first guess. But maybe they see Burn as more versatile and/or give Botman the easiest way back into the team in his natural position. Dont think so, Burn has developed a good relationship with Hall. Which Botman never did. And Eddie dont like to make changes to the back 4. If he can limit it to only one I think he will. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AyeDubbleYoo Posted January 4 Share Posted January 4 1 minute ago, SUPERTOON said: I’m actually more nervous having seen the lineups tbh. Why? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mahoneys Tache Posted January 4 Share Posted January 4 All logic and common sense suggests that this should be straightforward but I have a sinking feeling. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BermyToon Posted January 4 Share Posted January 4 6 minutes ago, El Prontonise said: Nothing beats competitive games for match fitness. I guess that's what Eddie wants for Botman since Schar is suspended for the Arsenal cup match also. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheBrownBottle Posted January 4 Share Posted January 4 Much more confident if Botman’s starting. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
KetsbaiaIsBald Posted January 4 Share Posted January 4 2 minutes ago, Displayname said: Dont think so, Burn has developed a good relationship with Hall. Which Botman never did. And Eddie dont like to make changes to the back 4. If he can limit it to only one I think he will. Yeah makes sense. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts