Guest scum Posted January 8, 2007 Share Posted January 8, 2007 Over-rated - FACT Undropable- FACT how on roeder, get your act together Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scribble Posted January 8, 2007 Share Posted January 8, 2007 Keep. Good player, works hard and looks to get the ball forward. Plays best alongside Butt in the middle. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest scum Posted January 8, 2007 Share Posted January 8, 2007 its a shame that players just walk through him on the edge of the box, and the next time he goes down with an ankle injury :wullie: Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest makemeacupoftea Posted January 8, 2007 Share Posted January 8, 2007 KEEP Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
M4 Posted January 8, 2007 Share Posted January 8, 2007 its a shame that players just walk through him on the edge of the box, and the next time he goes down with an ankle injury :wullie: quite. I'm still undecided blueyes.gif Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cajun Posted January 8, 2007 Share Posted January 8, 2007 Depends how much we "sell" him for. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest scum Posted January 8, 2007 Share Posted January 8, 2007 say we got the money we paid for him back Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nate Posted January 8, 2007 Share Posted January 8, 2007 I like Emre, but we do need at least one central midfielder to scores goals and that certainly isn't going to be Butt. Dyer seems to have significantly improved infront of goal, so i'd probaly play him ahead of the Turk, for now. No need to sell him though, i think we're relatively strong in the position with Butt, Parker, Dyer and Emre to chose from. I would look to exchange Parker for a more attacking player, if anything, but it can't be a priority in this window. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cajun Posted January 8, 2007 Share Posted January 8, 2007 say we got the money we paid for him back I would keep him. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Elma Posted January 8, 2007 Share Posted January 8, 2007 I'm a big follower of Turkish football and was pleased with his signing. He offers enough to keep him, but provided we got a decent fee I would let him go as other areas of the pitch need strengthening. Therefore, I voted to sell him, although as I say, only for the right price. He is one of our internationally recognised saleable assets, and probably the one we would miss the least. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr. Nguyen Van Falk Posted January 8, 2007 Share Posted January 8, 2007 say we got the money we paid for him back Don't be silly. Name me one player who we could get for that money who could replace him? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Syrette Posted January 8, 2007 Share Posted January 8, 2007 Swear we've had this thread before. Either way it's just going to end up playing host to the same old arguments about him. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Zenith Posted January 8, 2007 Share Posted January 8, 2007 His performances are worthless when played alongside 'Captain Fantastic'. Much more effective beside Butt, I'd cash in at the first opportunity though & spend the brass on Reo-Coker. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Northern Monkey Posted January 8, 2007 Share Posted January 8, 2007 i'd get rid if he got the right offer, he's a decent enough player, but not fantastic. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Syrette Posted January 8, 2007 Share Posted January 8, 2007 His performances are worthless when played alongside 'Captain Fantastic'. Much more effective beside Butt, I'd cash in at the first opportunity though & spend the brass on Reo-Coker. Why? I really don't see what everyone else seems to see in Reo-Coker. Even if we were to buy him, he wouldn't come cheap. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr. Nguyen Van Falk Posted January 8, 2007 Share Posted January 8, 2007 His performances are worthless when played alongside 'Captain Fantastic'. Much more effective beside Butt, I'd cash in at the first opportunity though & spend the brass on Reo-Coker. Why? I really don't see what everyone else seems to see in Reo-Coker. Even if we were to buy him, he wouldn't come cheap. Not to mention that would leave the team with 3 defensive minded CM's and one attacking CM. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Syrette Posted January 8, 2007 Share Posted January 8, 2007 His performances are worthless when played alongside 'Captain Fantastic'. Much more effective beside Butt, I'd cash in at the first opportunity though & spend the brass on Reo-Coker. Why? I really don't see what everyone else seems to see in Reo-Coker. Even if we were to buy him, he wouldn't come cheap. Not to mention that would leave the team with 3 defensive minded CM's and one attacking CM. Exactly. OK so he's younger than both Parker and Emre but I can't help but feel while he is a good player on his day, he's more than a little overrated by some. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Zenith Posted January 8, 2007 Share Posted January 8, 2007 His performances are worthless when played alongside 'Captain Fantastic'. Much more effective beside Butt, I'd cash in at the first opportunity though & spend the brass on Reo-Coker. Why? I really don't see what everyone else seems to see in Reo-Coker. Even if we were to buy him, he wouldn't come cheap. He wouldn't come cheap bit he's leagues ahead of both Parker & Emre. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Syrette Posted January 8, 2007 Share Posted January 8, 2007 His performances are worthless when played alongside 'Captain Fantastic'. Much more effective beside Butt, I'd cash in at the first opportunity though & spend the brass on Reo-Coker. Why? I really don't see what everyone else seems to see in Reo-Coker. Even if we were to buy him, he wouldn't come cheap. He wouldn't come cheap bit he's leagues ahead of both Parker & Emre. No doubt people will be asking me the reverse question, but exactly what makes you say that? A bit of top 6 interest in a player doesn't automatically mean they are better than what we have. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ElDiablo Posted January 8, 2007 Share Posted January 8, 2007 One goal against Man Utd and suddenly, everyone wants him. Depresses me at times. I'd rather keep Parker, than sell him and buy Reo-Coker, and I think Parker is WAY over-rated. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Zenith Posted January 8, 2007 Share Posted January 8, 2007 His performances are worthless when played alongside 'Captain Fantastic'. Much more effective beside Butt, I'd cash in at the first opportunity though & spend the brass on Reo-Coker. Why? I really don't see what everyone else seems to see in Reo-Coker. Even if we were to buy him, he wouldn't come cheap. He wouldn't come cheap bit he's leagues ahead of both Parker & Emre. No doubt people will be asking me the reverse question, but exactly what makes you say that? A bit of top 6 interest in a player doesn't automatically mean they are better than what we have. He has a better engine than Emre & doesn't spend half of the time on the pitch whinging for freekicks and standing around with hands on hips. & Parker is way way over-rated headless chicken. We would reap the rewards of playing Butt & Reo-Coker together. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Syrette Posted January 8, 2007 Share Posted January 8, 2007 Not that I like Emre's constant moaning and occasionally volatile behaviour (though I guess one could say that's just because he's passionate), I don't see how that is a reason Reo-Coker should be seen as better than him. Your "better engine" comment is a fair and debatable one, and something that is an essential thing to think about when comparing players. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Zenith Posted January 8, 2007 Share Posted January 8, 2007 Not that I like Emre's constant moaning and occasionally volatile behaviour (though I guess one could say that's just because he's passionate), I don't see how that is a reason Reo-Coker should be seen as better than him. Your "better engine" comment is a fair and debatable one, and something that is an essential thing to think about when comparing players. Take a bow bonny lad, take a bow. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nate Posted January 8, 2007 Share Posted January 8, 2007 One goal against Man Utd and suddenly, everyone wants him. Depresses me at times. What? All the interest in Reo-Coker started in the Summer, after he was one of the players of the season last year.. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest woffy_27 Posted January 8, 2007 Share Posted January 8, 2007 need to keep emre he's a matchwinner, probably the most gifted out of all our midfielders. yeah reo coker is a good player but what we need is another striker and possibly a full back, thats my opinion anyway Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now