ATB Posted February 4, 2007 Share Posted February 4, 2007 Today have I put togheter some very intresting fact regarding which player who is playing when we lose, draw and win. I have sum up all our 26 games in the PL so far and this is my results. (games - win% - draw% - lose%) Shay Given 15 - 53% - 20% - 27% Steve Harper 15 - 13% - 27% - 60% Pavel Srnicek 2 - 50% - 0% - 50% Stephen Carr 15 - 20% - 27% - 53% Craig Moore 13 - 15% - 31% - 54% Steven Taylor 17 - 47% - 18% - 35% Titus Bramble 11 - 27% - 27% - 45% Celestine Babayaro 10 - 50% - 10% - 40% Peter Ramage 19 - 37% - 21% - 42% Paul Huntington 10 - 50% - 20% - 30% David Edgar 3 - 0% - 67% - 33% Oguchi Onyewu 1 - 0% - 0% - 100% Nobby Solano 16 - 38% - 31% - 31% Emre 17 - 41% - 12% - 47% Scott Parker 22 - 27% - 27% - 45% Nicky Butt 21 - 43% - 14% - 43% Charles N'Zogbia 16 - 25% - 25% - 50% Damien Duff 15 - 27% - 20% - 53% James Milner 24 - 42% - 25% - 33% Matty Pattison 6 - 33% - 17% - 50% Kieorn Dyer 12 - 42% - 33% - 25% Alan O`Brien 1 - 0% - 100% - 0% Albert Luque 5 - 40% - 0% - 60% Shola Ameobi 9 - 22% - 22% - 56% Obafemi Martins 23 - 39% - 17% - 43% Giuseppe Rossi 11 - 27% - 18% - 55% Antonie Sibierski 18 - 44% - 22% - 33% __________________ Team overall Games 26 Win 35% draw 23% Loss 42% I think the stats is really intresting. The players we call shit has very bad stats. Carr, Moore, Bramble, Duff, Parker is low below the teams winning stat. Players like Butt, Taylor, Given and Sibbe has played verry well this year and has great numbers. Of course is it many factors that can affect the results. But still I think this tell you alot. And especelly Roeder should take a look at this! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ATB Posted February 4, 2007 Share Posted February 4, 2007 So this tells us that Carr shouled play. Bramble shouldent play in the back four! Play Solano - Talyor - Gooch - Edgar Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yorkie Posted February 4, 2007 Share Posted February 4, 2007 Nice little compilation. And, oddly enough, it does seem to seperate the evidently good performers from the bad performers. Nothing we don't already know, though. But it's decent proof. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Karjala Posted February 4, 2007 Share Posted February 4, 2007 Man U have scored 61 goals so far this season, next closest is Arsenal on 46. Newcastle have 32. Lowest in the prem is Watford (14) and West Ham (18) Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
James Posted February 4, 2007 Share Posted February 4, 2007 Good work, must have taken a lot of effort. Celestine Babayaro 10 - 50% - 10% - 40% This backs up my claim that we play better with Baba in my team. He has his faults, but we are better going forward when he is on the pitch. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
S.S.R. Posted February 4, 2007 Share Posted February 4, 2007 Form table for last 12 games: http://img405.imageshack.us/img405/1140/formky9.jpg Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
James Posted February 4, 2007 Share Posted February 4, 2007 Problem with the stats though thinking about is that due to numerous simulataneous injuries, they cant prove whether it is down to that individual player being missing, or whether another player being on the pitch is bringing their win-ratio down. Offers more proof for who should play than who shouldn't play in my opinion. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ATB Posted February 4, 2007 Share Posted February 4, 2007 I love statistics and I have alot of it. this season and backwards in booth the first team, reserves and ackademi. and yes it takes time=P Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ATB Posted February 4, 2007 Share Posted February 4, 2007 of course it´s not tells you all. but it´s tells you alot. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted February 4, 2007 Share Posted February 4, 2007 of course it´s not tells you all. but it´s tells you alot. Yes. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
oldtype Posted February 4, 2007 Share Posted February 4, 2007 Problem A Problem with the stats though thinking about is that due to numerous simulataneous injuries, they cant prove whether it is down to that individual player being missing, or whether another player being on the pitch is bringing their win-ratio down. Add to that other confounding variables. Have certain players played more home games? Have certain players played more games against weaker opposition? Have certain players played more when the team istelf was in bad form? Problem B Winratio: average 29.54 with SD 15.91 Drawratio: average 31.08 with SD 23.24 Lossratio: average 42.23 with SD 17.89 Pretty much none of the statistics, other than the ones with very small sample sizes (Oneywu, O'Brien etc.) are outside of two standard deviatons of the mean. Heck, most of them are within one standard deviation of the mean. Now I'll admit my statistics are a bit rusty, but following standard methodology, this means that we don't have sufficient evidence to prove that anything on that table is attributable to anything other than random chance. While I admire the effort in collecting the numbers, I don't think this is any more convincing proof that certain players are underpreforming than simply watching them and randomly shouting "HEY, Carr is CRAP!" Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Kenton Magpie Posted February 4, 2007 Share Posted February 4, 2007 I dont need stat's to figure out just who is good enough and who isnt to play for Newcastle United Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
oldtype Posted February 4, 2007 Share Posted February 4, 2007 I dont need stat's to figure out just who is good enough and who isnt to play for Newcastle United Good for you mate! If you're that sharp, I certainly hope they make you our next manager. Looks like we'll need one pretty soon... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Newcastle Fan Posted February 5, 2007 Share Posted February 5, 2007 If you add Euro games to this one i am sure the likes of Luque,Emre,Sibreski,Milner will have a really good win percentage.. Nice statistics though.. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Darth Toon Posted February 5, 2007 Share Posted February 5, 2007 Shows how important Given is to the team! (checking again though, the keeper stats must be wrong - you have them playing 32 games between them?) Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cajun Posted February 5, 2007 Share Posted February 5, 2007 Shows how important Given is to the team! (checking again though, the keeper stats must be wrong - you have them playing 32 games between them?) Good point Oh and Oguchi Onyewu out! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
UV Posted February 5, 2007 Share Posted February 5, 2007 With stats as crude as this, defenders in 4-3 victories come out better than those in 0-0 draws, and conversely attackers in 3-4 defeats come out worse than those in a 0-0 draw. Far more relevant IMO are the stats for goals conceeded per game for the defence/midfield, and goals scored per game for the attack/midfield. Here's the defensive stats for league games so far: Player Mins Conceed min/G Luque 99 1 99.00 N'Zogbia 882 9 98.00 Moore 1123 14 80.21 Babayaro 855 11 77.73 Harper 929 12 77.42 Duff 1220 16 76.25 Bramble 974 13 74.92 Pattison 213 3 71.00 Parker 1827 26 70.27 Carr 1335 19 70.26 Sibierski 1032 15 68.80 Milner 1750 26 67.31 Martins 1873 28 66.89 Ramage 1595 24 66.46 Taylor 1485 23 64.57 Ameobi 636 10 63.60 Given 1317 21 62.71 Edgar 241 4 60.25 Dyer 956 16 59.75 Butt 1422 24 59.25 Emre 1368 24 57.00 Solano 1118 20 55.90 Huntington 815 15 54.33 Srnicek 94 2 47.00 Onyewu 90 2 45.00 O'Brien 90 2 45.00 This proves that Harper, Carr, Moore, Bramble, Babayaro is our best defense. However it also shows that we need to play Luque for his defensive abilities Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now