Dave Posted February 8, 2007 Share Posted February 8, 2007 Dropping one place from 12th on Deloitte's 2007 money list: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/main.jhtml?view=DETAILS&grid=&xml=/sport/2007/02/08/sfnmon08.xml And still no closer to winning anything. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Gemmill Posted February 8, 2007 Share Posted February 8, 2007 We won the Leazes Mag Award for 5th best club in England on average over the last 10 years tbh. And only 4 other clubs have qualified for Europe more than us. We've also signed England internationals. What more do you people want??? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest smoggeordie Posted February 8, 2007 Share Posted February 8, 2007 We won the Leazes Mag Award for 5th best club in England on average over the last 10 years tbh. And only 4 other clubs have qualified for Europe more than us. We've also signed England internationals. What more do you people want??? The Toto cup Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Parky Posted February 8, 2007 Share Posted February 8, 2007 We're slipping. Christ Schalke and Spurs etc are tiny clubs. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChezGiven Posted February 8, 2007 Share Posted February 8, 2007 We'll pull away from Schalke and overtake Lyon and Roma next season with the new TV deal. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Ridzuan Posted February 8, 2007 Share Posted February 8, 2007 Im very surprise by some of the clubs on the list like Manchester City and maybe West Ham,but the latter having undergone a takeover earlier,it is not much of a surprise.But anyway,I dont think the statistics means anything,whether we are first or last.What matter the most to me is we win some trophies.You can be the richest club in the world,but if you did not win anything,I dont think it is worth it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted February 8, 2007 Share Posted February 8, 2007 That's kind of the point. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Isegrim Posted February 8, 2007 Share Posted February 8, 2007 We're slipping. Christ Schalke and Spurs etc are tiny clubs. I am everything but a Schalke fan, but how is Schalke a tiny club in comparison to Newcastle? I think the clubs have a lot in common - well except of the odd domestic and European trophy Schalke won in the last decade... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Morph Posted February 8, 2007 Share Posted February 8, 2007 Still ahead of Spurs. Thats good enough for me. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
madras Posted February 8, 2007 Share Posted February 8, 2007 rich how...we have a high turnover but not profit,simple maths .club A with a turn over of 5million and an expenditure of 4.5million will not be as rich as a club with a 4million turnover and expenditure of 1million. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Wally_McFool Posted February 8, 2007 Share Posted February 8, 2007 Schalke are a tiny club eh! Thats quite a severe dose of FreddyShepherditiis you've got there... mind you I'm not arguing with you about Spurs being a tiny club. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest shaun11177 Posted February 8, 2007 Share Posted February 8, 2007 In 2003/04 Newcastle were one place behind Liverpool with 2m seperating the clubs.The difference is now 3 places and 35.7m. Champions lge football needs to return to Newcastle for them to break into the money league top ten.This does not look likely before the 2008/09 season at the earliest. Quoted from the report. 2008/09 cant see it meself like. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
biggs Posted February 8, 2007 Share Posted February 8, 2007 We won the Leazes Mag Award for 5th best club in England on average over the last 10 years tbh. And only 4 other clubs have qualified for Europe more than us. We've also signed England internationals. What more do you people want??? greggs outlets at sjp Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
brummie Posted February 8, 2007 Share Posted February 8, 2007 We're slipping. Christ Schalke and Spurs etc are tiny clubs. So, Toon fans judge Newcastle as a massive club mainly on the fact that their attendances are so impressive, yet Schalke, average attendance 61,000, is in some way a tiny club? Kind of ironic. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
johnnypd Posted February 8, 2007 Share Posted February 8, 2007 We're slipping. Christ Schalke and Spurs etc are tiny clubs. So, Toon fans judge Newcastle as a massive club mainly on the fact that their attendances are so impressive, yet Schalke, average attendance 61,000, is in some way a tiny club? Kind of ironic. do birmingham fans judge other fans based on what one sole fan might happen to say (despite others in the thread saying otherwise), or is that just you? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
brummie Posted February 8, 2007 Share Posted February 8, 2007 We're slipping. Christ Schalke and Spurs etc are tiny clubs. So, Toon fans judge Newcastle as a massive club mainly on the fact that their attendances are so impressive, yet Schalke, average attendance 61,000, is in some way a tiny club? Kind of ironic. do birmingham fans judge other fans based on what one sole fan might happen to say (despite others in the thread saying otherwise), or is that just you? I'm judging what Parky said, and pointing out the contradiction in what he was saying. I didn't suggest that all toon fans would agree with him. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
madras Posted February 8, 2007 Share Posted February 8, 2007 We're slipping. Christ Schalke and Spurs etc are tiny clubs. go back immediatly and add a smiley or something so the numpties understand. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlueStar Posted February 8, 2007 Share Posted February 8, 2007 Hmm, the other four members of the top 5 English clubs in the rich list all have something in common that we don't. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted February 8, 2007 Share Posted February 8, 2007 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
johnnypd Posted February 8, 2007 Share Posted February 8, 2007 We're slipping. Christ Schalke and Spurs etc are tiny clubs. So, Toon fans judge Newcastle as a massive club mainly on the fact that their attendances are so impressive, yet Schalke, average attendance 61,000, is in some way a tiny club? Kind of ironic. do birmingham fans judge other fans based on what one sole fan might happen to say (despite others in the thread saying otherwise), or is that just you? I'm judging what Parky said, and pointing out the contradiction in what he was saying. I didn't suggest that all toon fans would agree with him. that's better Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
brummie Posted February 8, 2007 Share Posted February 8, 2007 We're slipping. Christ Schalke and Spurs etc are tiny clubs. So, Toon fans judge Newcastle as a massive club mainly on the fact that their attendances are so impressive, yet Schalke, average attendance 61,000, is in some way a tiny club? Kind of ironic. do birmingham fans judge other fans based on what one sole fan might happen to say (despite others in the thread saying otherwise), or is that just you? I'm judging what Parky said, and pointing out the contradiction in what he was saying. I didn't suggest that all toon fans would agree with him. that's better We're slipping. Christ Schalke and Spurs etc are tiny clubs. So, Toon fans judge Newcastle as a massive club mainly on the fact that their attendances are so impressive, yet Schalke, average attendance 61,000, is in some way a tiny club? Kind of ironic. do birmingham fans judge other fans based on what one sole fan might happen to say (despite others in the thread saying otherwise), or is that just you? I'm judging what Parky said, and pointing out the contradiction in what he was saying. I didn't suggest that all toon fans would agree with him. that's better I thought he was joking at first anyway, but then saw the reference to Spurs, thought of the general tension between you lot and them, and thought maybe he was actually serious. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
madras Posted February 8, 2007 Share Posted February 8, 2007 Hmm, the other four members of the top 5 English clubs in the rich list all have something in common that we don't. none of them wear stripes? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
johnnypd Posted February 8, 2007 Share Posted February 8, 2007 We're slipping. Christ Schalke and Spurs etc are tiny clubs. So, Toon fans judge Newcastle as a massive club mainly on the fact that their attendances are so impressive, yet Schalke, average attendance 61,000, is in some way a tiny club? Kind of ironic. do birmingham fans judge other fans based on what one sole fan might happen to say (despite others in the thread saying otherwise), or is that just you? I'm judging what Parky said, and pointing out the contradiction in what he was saying. I didn't suggest that all toon fans would agree with him. that's better I thought he was joking at first anyway, but then saw the reference to Spurs, thought of the general tension between you lot and them, and thought maybe he was actually serious. imo schalke are one of the most similar foreign teams to newcastle, gelsenkirchen is even twinned with the toon. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest smoggeordie Posted February 8, 2007 Share Posted February 8, 2007 At the end of the day it doesn't matter one bit how much money you bring in, if you fuck it all away like FS. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Parky Posted February 8, 2007 Share Posted February 8, 2007 We're slipping. Christ Schalke and Spurs etc are tiny clubs. go back immediatly and add a smiley or something so the numpties understand. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now