ujpest doza Posted March 4, 2007 Share Posted March 4, 2007 Shola is gash and has not been missed in the slightest. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
oldtype Posted March 4, 2007 Share Posted March 4, 2007 Shola is gash and has not been missed in the slightest. My heart disagrees most painfully whenever Sibbers comes on to the pitch. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest nyscooby Posted March 4, 2007 Share Posted March 4, 2007 Shola is shocking and always will be........ Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gray Posted March 4, 2007 Share Posted March 4, 2007 tbh, shola might have got us a winner yesterday.. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest nyscooby Posted March 4, 2007 Share Posted March 4, 2007 A winner ??? Several months out and his famous "first touch" is gonne be even worse......... You want to wait another season to finally decide hes sh1te Get shot now and foget about him. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest SLK Posted March 5, 2007 Share Posted March 5, 2007 I just hate how many times Shola gets caught off-side... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlueStar Posted March 5, 2007 Share Posted March 5, 2007 How will people react? http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v625/Yamcha666/1172491225168.jpg Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Howaythelads Posted March 6, 2007 Share Posted March 6, 2007 I hate it when he commits a foul after 5 seconds and just carries on in the same way for the rest of the match. Oh, and by the way, Mel..... http://www.newcastle-online.com/nufcforum/index.php?topic=36857.msg727382#msg727382 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Northern Monkey Posted March 6, 2007 Share Posted March 6, 2007 He's fucking rubbish. Anyone who thinks he is good enough to start for us is mental, and likewise, coming off the bench, there are very few times he will "change the game". He simply isn't good enough. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
toptoon Posted March 6, 2007 Share Posted March 6, 2007 His performances and goals tally under Roeder say otherwise. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Northern Monkey Posted March 6, 2007 Share Posted March 6, 2007 His performances and goals tally under Roeder say otherwise. 05/06 - 30 appearances, 8 goals, 2 assists, 25 offsides, 80 fouls. 06/07 - 9 appearances, 3 goals, 1 assist, 16 fouls. And his performances were poor. He can't trap a ball, and for a big lad, he's shit in the air. And on the ground. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Gemmill Posted March 6, 2007 Share Posted March 6, 2007 Decent squad player. Should never be first choice, but I'd far sooner see him come off the bench than fucking Sibierski (who should NOT be getting an extension to his contract btw). Whether people like it or not, we've missed him. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rich Posted March 6, 2007 Share Posted March 6, 2007 His performances and goals tally under Roeder say otherwise. 05/06 - 30 appearances, 8 goals, 2 assists, 25 offsides, 80 fouls. 06/07 - 9 appearances, 3 goals, 1 assist, 16 fouls. And his performances were poor. He can't trap a ball, and for a big lad, he's shit in the air. And on the ground. Roeder was in charge for 30 games last season? Bugger me. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cronky Posted March 6, 2007 Share Posted March 6, 2007 The big difference between Shola and Sibierski is that, for all his faults, Shola is capable of causing problems for the very best of defences. Two or three times in a game, he will open things up through his strength or his footwork, and create a chance out of a very unpromising situation. Even if he's having a shitty game, he can't be kept completely quiet. Sibierski has done a good job for us, but he's not very strong and good defenders can handle with no problem at all. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest alex Posted March 6, 2007 Share Posted March 6, 2007 Shola should be about 4th / 5th choice at best tbh. Isn't as bad as some of the stick he gets at the match but I see him as a Championship player really. However, in our current squad, he's the 3rd best striker imo. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mowen Posted March 6, 2007 Share Posted March 6, 2007 Shola isn't great. He's still our third best striker, however, and will be our second best whilst Owen is out. I can't really understand why his return to fitness would be a bad thing for us? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlueStar Posted March 6, 2007 Share Posted March 6, 2007 Shola isn't great. He's still our third best striker, however, and will be our second best whilst Owen is out. I can't really understand why his return to fitness would be a bad thing for us? Well Roeder often does the same thing with Shola that he does with Steven Carr, bafflingly gushing about how brilliant and important he is in a manner that goes way beyond just standing up for the lad. Which gives the impression that the return of Shola is a welcome alternative to getting a striker of premiership first 11 standard. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest alex Posted March 6, 2007 Share Posted March 6, 2007 To be fair, I think Shola's more useful to the current squad than Carr. That's not to say Roeder doesn't spout shite. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lloydie Posted March 6, 2007 Share Posted March 6, 2007 I rate Shola, glad to see him on the way back. If he'd been fit he'd have got 15 goals this season and made Martins better. He started the season with five in ten games, that's not bad going... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlueStar Posted March 6, 2007 Share Posted March 6, 2007 Oh, I'd certainly rather he was fit than injured, especially with the state of our squad at the moment. I'm just trying to explain why some people see a down side. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mowen Posted March 6, 2007 Share Posted March 6, 2007 Oh, I'd certainly rather he was fit than injured, especially with the state of our squad at the moment. I'm just trying to explain why some people see a down side. I can understand that, but there's no downside to him returning from injury at this moment in time. He's not good enough, but he'll still be the second best in his position, so he might as well be fit for the rest of the season as far as I'm concerned. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
NE5 Posted March 6, 2007 Share Posted March 6, 2007 the premiership will be shaking in their boots Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now