junkhead Posted May 5, 2007 Share Posted May 5, 2007 mom's not fucking shit Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Alan Shearer 9 Posted May 5, 2007 Share Posted May 5, 2007 too far Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Alan Shearer 9 Posted May 5, 2007 Share Posted May 5, 2007 Heard theres been a bombing in Hiroshima... post moderation? That is vomit inducing, you are obviously morally vacant I'm disgusted. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest triggy99 Posted May 5, 2007 Share Posted May 5, 2007 They mean nothing. They're only done after defeats which just makes them farsical, a knee jerk reaction. You call 1 win in 10 kneejerk? No, it seems knee jerk. That's how it appears from the outside, because none of it goes on when we do alright. "a win and the geordies are happy again" Do it every damn game, win, lose or draw if you want to be taken seriously. why would you go and protest if we won every game? If you want the board sacked, you should campaign all the time, not just when you lose. Otherwise it looks like a knee-jerk reaction to the loss. It seems like a campaign without any real substance. If we were winning every game no one would want the board sacked u idiot em.. we're not.. that's his point here was i talking to you? grant said you should campaign ALL THE TIME but my point is if we were winning why would people want to protest your point is f****** s*** are you special needs or something? its not hard to understand what im saying. my point is that we shouldnt have to protest all the time because for example say roeder is still manager next season, and he goes on to win every game next season why would anyone be bothered about protesting? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest triggy99 Posted May 5, 2007 Share Posted May 5, 2007 They mean nothing. They're only done after defeats which just makes them farsical, a knee jerk reaction. You call 1 win in 10 kneejerk? No, it seems knee jerk. That's how it appears from the outside, because none of it goes on when we do alright. "a win and the geordies are happy again" Do it every damn game, win, lose or draw if you want to be taken seriously. why would you go and protest if we won every game? If you want the board sacked, you should campaign all the time, not just when you lose. Otherwise it looks like a knee-jerk reaction to the loss. It seems like a campaign without any real substance. If we were winning every game no one would want the board sacked u idiot For god's sake. We're not winning every game though. So a good run over xmas or beating liverpool does not change the underlying problems, but there are no protests then. So to have some credability they should protest through these times too. Protesting @ Sheff U then not for months while we were winning made it look like people were happy again, and that it was a knee jerk reaction. People will think this is a knee jerk again because they've seen them be dispelled by half decent form before. here was i talking to you? grant said you should campaign ALL THE TIME but my point is if we were winning why would people want to protest So we win a couple of games and the problems have gone? read my first post you retard. i said if we were winning ALL our games why would people want to protest. you might of actually had a point if i had said 'win a couple of games' You're obviously quite the idiot and have to resort to abuse so i shan't be replying to you anymore. But we're never going to win ALL THE TIME with this board (or any for that matter, really) so it's beside the point. i have to resort to abuse? go and cry to ur mammy u little bitch Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
junkhead Posted May 5, 2007 Share Posted May 5, 2007 They mean nothing. They're only done after defeats which just makes them farsical, a knee jerk reaction. You call 1 win in 10 kneejerk? No, it seems knee jerk. That's how it appears from the outside, because none of it goes on when we do alright. "a win and the geordies are happy again" Do it every damn game, win, lose or draw if you want to be taken seriously. why would you go and protest if we won every game? If you want the board sacked, you should campaign all the time, not just when you lose. Otherwise it looks like a knee-jerk reaction to the loss. It seems like a campaign without any real substance. If we were winning every game no one would want the board sacked u idiot em.. we're not.. that's his point here was i talking to you? grant said you should campaign ALL THE TIME but my point is if we were winning why would people want to protest your point is f****** s*** are you special needs or something? its not hard to understand what im saying. my point is that we shouldnt have to protest all the time because for example say roeder is still manager next season, and he goes on to win every game next season why would anyone be bothered about protesting? i am special needs, yes.. what you're saying is fairly simple to understand, it's just not possible and has no relevance to what the guy said Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Superior Acuña Posted May 5, 2007 Share Posted May 5, 2007 They mean nothing. They're only done after defeats which just makes them farsical, a knee jerk reaction. You call 1 win in 10 kneejerk? No, it seems knee jerk. That's how it appears from the outside, because none of it goes on when we do alright. "a win and the geordies are happy again" Do it every damn game, win, lose or draw if you want to be taken seriously. why would you go and protest if we won every game? If you want the board sacked, you should campaign all the time, not just when you lose. Otherwise it looks like a knee-jerk reaction to the loss. It seems like a campaign without any real substance. If we were winning every game no one would want the board sacked u idiot For god's sake. We're not winning every game though. So a good run over xmas or beating liverpool does not change the underlying problems, but there are no protests then. So to have some credability they should protest through these times too. Protesting @ Sheff U then not for months while we were winning made it look like people were happy again, and that it was a knee jerk reaction. People will think this is a knee jerk again because they've seen them be dispelled by half decent form before. here was i talking to you? grant said you should campaign ALL THE TIME but my point is if we were winning why would people want to protest So we win a couple of games and the problems have gone? read my first post you retard. i said if we were winning ALL our games why would people want to protest. you might of actually had a point if i had said 'win a couple of games' You're obviously quite the idiot and have to resort to abuse so i shan't be replying to you anymore. But we're never going to win ALL THE TIME with this board (or any for that matter, really) so it's beside the point. i have to resort to abuse? go and cry to ur mammy u little bitch Well obviously there's no point arguing with somebody with such wit and intelligence. You got me. mackems.gif Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest elbee909 Posted May 5, 2007 Share Posted May 5, 2007 Ban everyone but me Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest triggy99 Posted May 5, 2007 Share Posted May 5, 2007 Ban everyone but me dave was saying something about a automatic 2 day ban for trying to get another person banned. cough cough Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Newcastle Fan Posted May 5, 2007 Share Posted May 5, 2007 http://www.stud.tu-ilmenau.de/~haku-in/pics/retarded.jpg Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Peter.Sthlm Posted May 5, 2007 Share Posted May 5, 2007 http://www.stud.tu-ilmenau.de/~haku-in/pics/retarded.jpg mackems.gif Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest triggy99 Posted May 5, 2007 Share Posted May 5, 2007 http://www.stud.tu-ilmenau.de/~haku-in/pics/retarded.jpg have you been taking photos of grant on the sly? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Keefaz Posted May 5, 2007 Share Posted May 5, 2007 It's not related to anything, but I just found this: http://logan-1.mirror.waffleimages.com/files/2e/2e0075a7eced1e5bf0d51a1e3139574af5071fcb.jpg Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Unlucky Luque Posted May 5, 2007 Share Posted May 5, 2007 Heard theres been a bombing in Hiroshima... post moderation? That is vomit inducing, you are obviously morally vacant I'm disgusted. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Christian Hayne Posted May 5, 2007 Share Posted May 5, 2007 are the protests still going on? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Superior Acuña Posted May 5, 2007 Share Posted May 5, 2007 http://www.stud.tu-ilmenau.de/~haku-in/pics/retarded.jpg have you been taking photos of grant on the sly? mackems.gif Do you realise "u" called me a 'bitch'? ...That alone shows i'm better than "u" Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nate Posted May 5, 2007 Share Posted May 5, 2007 Any news on Allardyce, Christian-ITK-Hayne? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Christian Hayne Posted May 5, 2007 Share Posted May 5, 2007 nope not atm, i will be sure to tell you if i do Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest triggy99 Posted May 5, 2007 Share Posted May 5, 2007 http://www.stud.tu-ilmenau.de/~haku-in/pics/retarded.jpg have you been taking photos of grant on the sly? mackems.gif Do you realise "u" called me a 'bitch'? ...That alone shows i'm better than "u" i thought you wernt going to reply to me anymore? :thebirdman: Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
thedudeabides Posted May 5, 2007 Share Posted May 5, 2007 Sack the board?? Side stepping the real issue which is Roeder for me! Are you really that stupid? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest elbee909 Posted May 5, 2007 Share Posted May 5, 2007 Ban everyone but me dave was saying something about a automatic 2 day ban for trying to get another person banned. cough cough Yes, because a suggestion to ban everyone is obviously serious. Let's hope that cough doesn't turn out to be something fun, like tuberculosis. Think you should call yourself Trigger rather than Triggy. Would explain the Dave obsession. "Alright Dave." Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
stozo Posted May 5, 2007 Share Posted May 5, 2007 are the protests still going on? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kimbo Posted May 5, 2007 Share Posted May 5, 2007 "Sack the board"?! Who exactly is going to "sack the board" Stupid chant, "Roeder out" is atleast realistic. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ElDiablo Posted May 5, 2007 Share Posted May 5, 2007 Ban everyone but me dave was saying something about a automatic 2 day ban for trying to get another person banned. cough cough Yes, because a suggestion to ban everyone is obviously serious. Let's hope that cough doesn't turn out to be something fun, like tuberculosis. Think you should call yourself Trigger rather than Triggy. Would explain the Dave obsession. "Alright Dave." Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest elbee909 Posted May 5, 2007 Share Posted May 5, 2007 Board the sack! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now