madras

There's still time

Not necessarily. It may be that its done that way to keep money back should another deal become available now or in January. Also Chelsea seem fine with this structure so it must benefit them as well

Just explain to them about the hegemony the current system creates.

Also, no seeding. If Lincoln Red Imps get Jeunesse D'esch and Real Madrid get Man City in the first round then so be it.

Miley, Anderson, Longstaff and either Dummett or the keeper.

Not being on twitter, I'm curious to know what the replies were to NUFC360, apart from Bruno's obvs

Cos he only has the one.

We played Inter in the Fairs Cup. Bit of a battle by all accounts

I want a group we can get through with away fans that aren't going to be arseholes. That kind of goes for our lot going away as well.

Did Andrea Romeo make it over ?

You start off reading that in a silly faux Polish accent and you end up thinking, if he was British he'd have said "Yeah well obviously I'm pleased to be here" and that would've been it.

You play what you think will work, sometimes it may be one sometimes the other sometimes both and with Isaks mobility and ability I think he could be used in various ways. As it stands if either gets injured we realistically have one option and Wilsons injury record is a worry on that score.

I disagree a bit. Isak's quietest games have been when he's been isolated up front when teams just stopped him from holding it up (Villa and Brentford and we saw the change at Brentford, even Villa we were much better with 2). I'm not saying week in week out that's the way to go but now and again against certain opposition. Also both players have had there share of injuries, another forward gives the option which we don't have right now.

I was there but my first victory over them was 4-1 in 74/75. 3-0 up in half an hour and 7yr old me thought we were the best team in the world.

Rushford played through the middle a lot and to good effect and City used Foden and DeBruyn (I think) as false 9's. And that's playing as lone strikers. Remember I'm envisaging using both Wilson and Isak together.

Even a developer more than what we have, a through the middle Minteh. I think we are in for an evolution of style this season and two strikers, especially with Isak's mobility could be called for.

Neither fill me with confidence. (In that position).

Am I the only one to think a striker is a need ? We have no option to go 2 up front if either gets injured or should we want to start like that (I'd love to see Isak as an advanced 10 off Wilson) we'd have no cover on the bench.

I'm not on twitter so not every single bell-end.

That Sauer that's mentioned. His first name is Tom.

He'll not even admit to him being signed yet.

New owners have had enough. They're selling up.

Jinx !

For it to be rescinded does it have to be a clear and obvious error, which if it does, I don't think it fits the criteria. It was soft certainly but also rash and I wouldn't say it was a clear and obvious error, for that he wouldn't have had to make contact.

Add in those if they see players in public have to dash over and have a selfie and chat on as if they are mates. Leave them the fuck alone man, let them have their own lives away from the pitch.