madras

Is it because we are being too generous and tolerant that it looks like the plans will fall foul of the 1951 Refugee convention and the ECHR. Also do the figures about how many refugees we take in prove we are the most tolerant, generous etc ?

Bournemouth need a Lascalles on the bench

Yeah but the number who do qualify is higher than the Government like to make out and why are they having to come on those boats instead of legitimate means ?

You said they don't have a legitimate claim. I pointed that over 60% do

Yet over 60% get their claim granted.

I'm pretty sure I've covered all variants in this thread just to be safe.

It's also funny as by implication they are saying they themselves are sleeping.

Is it "the wokes" saying Gary can't say what he wants but Alan and Andrew can ?

The profile hasn't been received well has it ? Also Lineker seems to be getting backing plus it throws a spotlight on the Govts/Beebs hypocrisy. It seems like a massive OG to me.

And that's not a spelling mistake.

While allowing others in a similar position or worse, Governing positions, to say what they want with impunity. Their argument only works it applies across the board.

Really ? I think it makes the BBC look a Govt stooge and the Govt by extension wants to control what ought to be impartial........m and then we have the hypocrisy re Sharp, Sugar etc. Its in no way a win for the blues.

The thing is though I want to watch it to hear what I hope will be loads of pro-Lineker chants.

Will it not be the rotting herring thing ? Edit. Googled it, Surstromming.

Maybe there's bias when more famous and powerful clubs play against others. See it all the time with Real and PSG as well.

I wouldn't be put off buying someone from somewhere because previous buys from there didn't work out. FWIW I don't rate him but if someone at the club who probably knows a damn sight more than me does I'm not going to throw too much of a tantrum.

Yeah I did. Surely there's better ways to say you don't thinks he's good enough, like "I don't think he's good enough".

So we buy the likes of Bruno, Botman, Isak and if some at the club think McTomonay think will be a good buy for us, even if I disagree, its hardly going to make me think "I'm done".

Good to see him back but I hate it when people use that adage as it's such a lot of unthinking shite.

Or all 3. Sponsorships will be "juiced" but so as not to fall foul of the new rules brought in because of us. Expect a few new "partners" in the summer which will be priced at the higher end of where we are.

Doesn't even make sense though. If there's only one person named then that person has to be the one no matter who it is. Could phrase it "Who is the biggest tosser (choose someone who's no doubt one of his heroes) Kevin Ball Kevin Ball Kevin Ball Kevin Ball and the answer has to be one of those choices, therefore Kevin Ball (which we already knew)

Sponsorships will grow and sometimes offers for players come along that are too good to turn down. But it's not as if we are having to sell.

Worst view I've had was front row by the corner flag Milburn/Gallowgate corner. Great for seeing how fast the game is and the skill and technique of the players but a rubbish view of the game.

Most of those I know that do it live away so share tickets so they are guaranteed when they're up. Also some who shifts where they work a few Saturdays/Sundays.

The people I know have done it for years, through good times (few) and bad (many).