thomas

http://i.imgur.com/PE7SDda.gif

Hot Latin American women > Hot Scandinavian women Average Latin American women < Average Scandinavian Women True story. To paraphrase a certain someone when I posted Dempsey's wife, I don't give a shit about the average woman in a thread dedicated to unattainable filth. Take your true story and read it to a weeping Brazilian child. yeah well you're both wrong. norge hoes 4 lyfe

goat material

http://www.newcastle-online.org/nufcforum/Smileys/Newcastle-Online/icon_lol.gif

well thank god for small favors

I hate me too. I have to get drunk just to sleep in the same bed as myself. When will this nightmare end?

Massively. All fucking summer I've been trying to forget about this cunt and you pop in here when it's bumped hoping he's lost the power of speech, but nar it's good ol' bimps going "ah wish ee wuz dead, that'd be good, hurrr". It's annoying and it's actually been going on for ages. The fact that you seem to constantly fall out with people on here probably says more about you then them or the points you try to make. It also seems like you become obsessed with the people you have an issue with and constantly have a go at them for doing nothing else but stating their opinion or thoughts. Just give it a rest man. This falls apart for me for two reasons. One - posts aren't justified by their own existence. An overabundance can definitely cross the line into a kind of pollution IMO. ((this is not a commentary on bimps, tbh I don't care about the Pardew thread and normally don't read it. Man's a cunt, end of. Wake me when he's gone.)) Two - Even if #1 was a valid defense, then any post of any sort, including a post criticizing too many posts, is itself therefore valid, and you can't criticize IP for criticizing. And finally I've never bought the whole "well if you don't want to read it don't open the thread :tongue3: " defense, because you absolutely wouldn't try to apply that to any other public space. Hmm don't want to step on dog turds in the park? don't blame the owners who didn't pick them up - you shouldn't be walking there if you don't want to step on them.

Some other eligible Dutch player would have had to play in goal. And I think a Costa Rican player would have to be taken off to keep numbers equal? edit:nope, nothing about that happening during kicks - a player would be taken off only before they started the kicks. I think the NL would just have 1 less player to take kicks.

http://www.fifa.com/mm/document/affederation/federation/laws_of_the_game_0708_10565.pdf pages 54 & 55 If a goalkeeper is injured during kicks being taken then he can be subbed, provided the team has a substitution remaining. Barring that: So yes, you're correct, Krul would not have been able to come on in anything but under the guise of poor sportsmanship after Cillessen fakes an injury.

is this the face of a sexist? http://i.imgur.com/SC0PARF.png

try this one on : hatem been eatin' hahaha.

Really beginning to think it

shame to lose di maria

forget how huge neuer is at times

t-ho would have saved that

poop

<3 valbuena

google can't be arsed

Think he was making a gag about Hamann being banned from driving for speeding. Wasn't that bad IMO. Sounded like first guy said "auto-bai" Lawro corrects him and looks around with a "haha, what an ass, doesn't know how it's pronounced" face and then goes into shrewsbury town lion mode when he realizes no one else was laughing. edit: or he got it too late and just blurts out "autoban" when he gets the joke, like a spaz

it's so goddamn fast, the regret of being a dick correcting the guy hits him like a runaway bus :lol:

he doesn't halfway look like he's between meth binges

that FK the ol triple option dipsy-doodle wide left. 60% of the time it works every time.