thomas

how cisse

quite liked our early plan A of trying to murder Agbonlahor, should go back to that

sounds more exciting than the game, give us a play by play.

on the one hand I want to see us do well and win on the other hand I have a lot of things to do today so if villa could score a first half goal that would free up an hour for me. Torn.

"He (Pulis) won't give a hoo-dooby(?) about winning manager of the year?" Did anyone else hear lee dixon just then?

gus poo yet?

Landon Donovan has been petty good at the World Cup: pic.twitter.com/8GMo01N3Wh (via @LAGalaxyInsider) #usmnt http://i.imgur.com/30FgqzA.jpg

"I've got to find a way to minimize income" - no businessman ever.

:lol:

Wow, I can't imagine not getting along with Big Sam Allardyce. Something must be seriously wrong.

:nod: :yes: :whatever:

But could he have done it on a cold Tuesday night in Stoke?

good play by man city and it all started by demichelis not being involved at all. more of the same please.

We have a chance then. (Ok, he's not as shit as he used to be) He's rubbish.

What's your problem with that? Apart from the hypothetical nature of it, it suggests a desire for Newcastle fans to lose games. Well it is a hypothetical though so there's no getting apart from it. And your conclusion you've drawn from it is ridiculous. No one wants to lose games (plural), but if the situation was that losing specifically the next game to Villa would see Pardew sacked then I would take that loss as we're safe in the league and I want Pardew out. Skeletor nicely sums up what the question really is. Your inference is flawed. If he's not sacked after we lose to villa (or win or draw) I assume you'll want us to lose the next game...and the one after that until he does go. So it would be plural. That's not the terms anyone was talking about though. So no, your assumption is flawed, it's not plural and you're being obtuse.

Leading the charge in ushering in a brave new world of journalistic integrity. Shame on them indeed, The Club.

This literally doesn't correspond to anything I wrote. I'm just saying that the poll is a non-question because it's the same as asking 'do you want Pardew sacked'. Since the Villa result is clearly meaningless, there would be no reason to vote no. Have some imagination man. It's just a thought exercise. Games of "what if?" are time killers, that's all. Conceptually no different than 20 pages of "what if Vince McMahon actually bought the club?" ponderings.

What's your problem with that? Apart from the hypothetical nature of it, it suggests a desire for Newcastle fans to lose games. Well it is a hypothetical though so there's no getting apart from it. And your conclusion you've drawn from it is ridiculous. No one wants to lose games (plural), but if the situation was that losing specifically the next game to Villa would see Pardew sacked then I would take that loss as we're safe in the league and I want Pardew out. Skeletor nicely sums up what the question really is. Your inference is flawed.

it's like Kinnear's senility was contagious.

Some of those articles man http://www.winnersports.co.uk/kagawa-swap-for-gundogan-would-benefit-man-utd-fc-24376 no shit it would benefit them

Why. Why is this being given any thought

three less legitimately thought Milliard has been on the way out for a while and everyone was using billion to be 109 edit: Had a look. Didn't know it was called long scale/short scale. But yeah, our billions have been the same for 40 years. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Milliard#cite_note-40

find anyone voting no and teabag them with a wrecking ball.