Wullie

Ginola

Bottom club Dijon come from behind to beat PSG.

Rather bizarre timing.

One of the most tenuous yet.

"You know what would really improve the best and most relatively significant moment in any sport? If we get a jobsworth to trawl back through the video frame by frame and try to find something wrong with it while everyone sits and waits for them to do it."

It can't be fixed. Football is too fluid for it to ever work satisfactorily. And frankly even if it worked perfectly 100% of the time, it would still make the game worse. Checking every goal after it's been scored and after the crowd have reacted to it is rapidly changing the very nature of the experience that is the most popular sport in the world.

Molde have fucking done me tonight. Everyone else playing against ten men this weekend has ran riot but not those useless bastards.

https://twitter.com/AFC_Sean/status/1188521134729453569

Fancy a Willems card at 5/1, up against Traore and can't imagine him getting loads of help from ASM.

This is mental.

It was after we had a man sent off they did this to us as well, they move the ball round so well, perfect for exploiting the extra space.

Could be the end of Ralf this.

Lundstram looks good value. Pilko, that slip is 100/1 on 365.

BTTS Over 2 Man United cards Over 4 total cards Over 8 corners Liverpool win 14/1 Schalke/Liverpool win/BTTS 15/1

Prime example that corner West Ham got this afternoon that was clearly wrong and that they nearly scored from.

Ball clearly contacts just below the PL badge on his sleeve. That's quite far down the arm.

VAR with yet another petty offside long before the goal in the Dortmund game. Marco Reus's shoelaces were apparently offside about fifteen seconds before they scored.

Aye I've used that site for years.

Well that's why there's a trial, to examine context, threat, all sorts of nuance, thankfully we don't convict on the basis of a sentence. Sexual assault is a very serious offence that can destroy lives if it's on one's record and it's right that there is a high bar that has to be reached to get a conviction.

Folk just speculating about a case where a bloke was found not guilty where others seem to be speculating that the jury may have got it wrong. Admitted kissing her didn't he? So why go through an anonymous court case? Sell this fascinating story to the tabloids without it ("Gazza was drunk and kissed me on a train", Christ she'll be able to give up work ). I never stopped hearing about how the lass who accused Adam Johnson was after making her fortune, yet he was found guilty and I've not read her tale in The Sun, why is that? Could it be because there is rarely money to be made from accusing someone of a crime (in this country anyway) and it's a ludicrous myth that continues to persist? Most people who report crimes to the police do so because they feel they've been wronged and want the person to face justice... apart from when women accuse men of sexual assault of course. Then they're money grabbing slags. That last line is way out of order, can’t see anyone suggesting that. I don't know any other way to interpret the posts by BG and Scoot. I'm not suggesting the jury got it wrong, no reason to think they did at all tbh. That doesn't mean the complainant was lying though, just that what happened wasn't enough to constitute an assault.

Admitted kissing her didn't he? So why go through an anonymous court case? Sell this fascinating story to the tabloids without it ("Gazza was drunk and kissed me on a train", Christ she'll be able to give up work ). I never stopped hearing about how the lass who accused Adam Johnson was after making her fortune, yet he was found guilty and I've not read her tale in The Sun, why is that? Could it be because there is rarely money to be made from accusing someone of a crime (in this country anyway) and it's a ludicrous myth that continues to persist? Most people who report crimes to the police do so because they feel they've been wronged and want the person to face justice... apart from when women accuse men of sexual assault of course. Then they're money grabbing slags.

I'm asking?

Sounds like it. Bitch. What a strange take considering Gazza admitted it and witnesses said it happened. It's strange of people to think that the woman seen an opportunity to make a few quid because of who he was and what happened? Ok. Make a few quid how?