Dokko

Would buy a more experienced CB rather than Ferdinand (Ayala?) and a couple of squad full backs. There's still about £24m left over. Another LB & RB is a must (Matty Taylor & Ryan Taylor), maybe bring Woodgate in for £4-5m then i'd be happy with the remainder of the team blending with that (Given, Harper, Krul, Taylor, Ramage, Hunty, Duff, Zoggy, Emre, Parker, #Milner, Martins, Owen) those not listed i'd sell.

Micah Richards - £11m Curtis Davies - £6m Anton Ferdinand - £8m Leighton Baines - £6.5m Wright-Phillips - £9m Owen Hargreaves - £10m Joey Barton - £6m Dean Ashton - £11m Darren Bent - £8m PS: I had to do it, thoughts like this keep me going (and am currently having a sesh on FM07)

Pardon? Being a factory worker means your less of a person than yourself and others? Hardly. Grow up ffs. Don't be shallow like me. I am im 13 now. Im excercising the point all the racist f*cks are working class people who are jealous of Asians and Blacks getting better jobs. In this case black footballers. :roll: Asians are more racist than your average white person, not just exclusively against whites, mainly against each other.

Oh, and yes, if he used a comma (,) instead of a fullstop (.) then yes you'd have a point, suggesting otherwise is a bit silly. Boring, tbh. Aren't you tbh.

Oh, and yes, if he used a comma (,) instead of a fullstop (.) then yes you'd have a point, suggesting otherwise is a bit silly.

So all these were about Huntington. But just another Peter Ramage, Steven Taylor. (comment about hunty) GAve the ball away one to many times. (comment about hunty) But we'll wait and see." (comment about hunty) But this one was about Taylor. Big Tackler but lack of composure on the ball. Bullshit tbh.

two great goals from Chelsea to pull this round.

He seems like a blatant WUM to me, cant think how anyone would have any other opinion tbh. "Expected alot from this young lad. But just another Peter Ramage, Steven Taylor. Big Tackler but lack of composure on the ball. GAve the ball away one to many times. But we'll wait and see." He's played twice, expectations ruined after 180mins of watching him live. :roll: If he becomes another Steven Taylor then were laughing FFS. Defenders aren't known for their composure on the ball, more to do with their positioning off it. Most players come though out of position, especially CBs. Taylor & Ramage did here, Bramble did at Ipswich, Carragher did at Liverpool for years! Then he has a crack at Given FFS, this guy is a WUM, or fuking stupid. Wum? Think so. "But we'll wait and see" indicates that he's not a WUM and that he's simply putting his first impression across and is showing a willingness to keep an open mind and see if he's proved right or wrong. WUM-like behaviour? Erm, no. He then puts across a point about Shay's distribution. Which IS poor. It's NOT a lie or any kind of bullshit. He even makes a point in saying that it's the only flaw in his game. WUM-like behaviour? No, just an opinion he has. Certainly a WUM, and has done a good job on you thinking he isn't one, or your doing a good job Wummin' the mods to death in this thread Yet you can't point out any of the attributes that make him a WUM and have pointed out things that are actually just a difference in opinion. Its just a difference of opinion that you dont see him as a wum, and the rest of the board do. I've pointed out why i think he is, especially the Taylor comment, its just plain stupid. His Taylor comment that he lacks composure on the ball? That's an attribute that all good defenders should have. Quite a fair comment I feel. But because you disagree, he's a WUM? His comment about composure came in a total different sentence, didn't you see the . ? That means another sentence has started, thats how i read it anyway. He implied Hunty would only ever become as good as Taylor, which is a fuking daft comment since Taylor is the best defender we've had in the EPL apart from Woodgate and he's only a nipper himself. So he isn't allowed to elaborate on his point using more than one sentence? Once there's a full stop we shouldn't read any further and only take into account that single sentence? Erm...? Yet it's his opinion that Taylor isn't good enough? Which, at current ability level and with his inconsistancy, he isn't for a team that wants to be in the top 4. So anybody that suggests Taylor isn't good enough is a WUM? You don't feel that he could genuinely hold that opinion? Edit: In fact, going back and reading what he said, the only thing he knocks taylor for is his composure! Oh he must be a WUM to suggest that Taylor lacks composure What the fuk are you on about now? Its seperate statments of his opinions about Hunty, not Taylor, one of them being Hunty could only be as good as Taylor. So he's only knocking Taylor about composure, yet he goes on about giving the ball away as well. Where does it end then? Usually at the end of a fuking sentence, fuking hell man. So is he talking about Taylor still, or hunty, or both? I really dont care tbh, and cant be bothered going round in circles about a Wum with a Wum tbh. What the fuck are you on about sentences for? He says he'll just be another Taylor, a big tackler but little composure. I don't care how he grammatically structures it, thats what his point is! It's clear that you feel that Taylor is expempt from any sort of constructive critisism and that anybody who does say something negative about him is a WUM. he'll just be another Taylor, a big tackler but little composure Wrong. But just another Peter Ramage, Steven Taylor. Big Tackler but lack of composure on the ball. This makes it clearer: "Expected alot from this young lad. But just another Peter Ramage, Steven Taylor. (comment about hunty) Big Tackler but lack of composure on the ball. (comment about hunty) GAve the ball away one to many times. (comment about hunty) But we'll wait and see." (comment about hunty) Two sentences not one, meaning he wasn't saying it like you read, but more like how i read it. So back to my point, the kid is either a wum, or fuking stupid. End of point, end of discussion.

He seems like a blatant WUM to me, cant think how anyone would have any other opinion tbh. "Expected alot from this young lad. But just another Peter Ramage, Steven Taylor. Big Tackler but lack of composure on the ball. GAve the ball away one to many times. But we'll wait and see." He's played twice, expectations ruined after 180mins of watching him live. :roll: If he becomes another Steven Taylor then were laughing FFS. Defenders aren't known for their composure on the ball, more to do with their positioning off it. Most players come though out of position, especially CBs. Taylor & Ramage did here, Bramble did at Ipswich, Carragher did at Liverpool for years! Then he has a crack at Given FFS, this guy is a WUM, or fuking stupid. Wum? Think so. "But we'll wait and see" indicates that he's not a WUM and that he's simply putting his first impression across and is showing a willingness to keep an open mind and see if he's proved right or wrong. WUM-like behaviour? Erm, no. He then puts across a point about Shay's distribution. Which IS poor. It's NOT a lie or any kind of bullshit. He even makes a point in saying that it's the only flaw in his game. WUM-like behaviour? No, just an opinion he has. Certainly a WUM, and has done a good job on you thinking he isn't one, or your doing a good job Wummin' the mods to death in this thread Yet you can't point out any of the attributes that make him a WUM and have pointed out things that are actually just a difference in opinion. Its just a difference of opinion that you dont see him as a wum, and the rest of the board do. I've pointed out why i think he is, especially the Taylor comment, its just plain stupid. His Taylor comment that he lacks composure on the ball? That's an attribute that all good defenders should have. Quite a fair comment I feel. But because you disagree, he's a WUM? His comment about composure came in a total different sentence, didn't you see the . ? That means another sentence has started, thats how i read it anyway. He implied Hunty would only ever become as good as Taylor, which is a fuking daft comment since Taylor is the best defender we've had in the EPL apart from Woodgate and he's only a nipper himself. So he isn't allowed to elaborate on his point using more than one sentence? Once there's a full stop we shouldn't read any further and only take into account that single sentence? Erm...? Yet it's his opinion that Taylor isn't good enough? Which, at current ability level and with his inconsistancy, he isn't for a team that wants to be in the top 4. So anybody that suggests Taylor isn't good enough is a WUM? You don't feel that he could genuinely hold that opinion? Edit: In fact, going back and reading what he said, the only thing he knocks taylor for is his composure! Oh he must be a WUM to suggest that Taylor lacks composure What the fuk are you on about now? Its seperate statments of his opinions about Hunty, not Taylor, one of them being Hunty could only be as good as Taylor. So he's only knocking Taylor about composure, yet he goes on about giving the ball away as well. Where does it end then? Usually at the end of a fuking sentence, fuking hell man. So is he talking about Taylor still, or hunty, or both? I really dont care tbh, and cant be bothered going round in circles about a Wum with a Wum tbh.

He seems like a blatant WUM to me, cant think how anyone would have any other opinion tbh. "Expected alot from this young lad. But just another Peter Ramage, Steven Taylor. Big Tackler but lack of composure on the ball. GAve the ball away one to many times. But we'll wait and see." He's played twice, expectations ruined after 180mins of watching him live. :roll: If he becomes another Steven Taylor then were laughing FFS. Defenders aren't known for their composure on the ball, more to do with their positioning off it. Most players come though out of position, especially CBs. Taylor & Ramage did here, Bramble did at Ipswich, Carragher did at Liverpool for years! Then he has a crack at Given FFS, this guy is a WUM, or fuking stupid. Wum? Think so. "But we'll wait and see" indicates that he's not a WUM and that he's simply putting his first impression across and is showing a willingness to keep an open mind and see if he's proved right or wrong. WUM-like behaviour? Erm, no. He then puts across a point about Shay's distribution. Which IS poor. It's NOT a lie or any kind of bullshit. He even makes a point in saying that it's the only flaw in his game. WUM-like behaviour? No, just an opinion he has. Certainly a WUM, and has done a good job on you thinking he isn't one, or your doing a good job Wummin' the mods to death in this thread Yet you can't point out any of the attributes that make him a WUM and have pointed out things that are actually just a difference in opinion. Its just a difference of opinion that you dont see him as a wum, and the rest of the board do. I've pointed out why i think he is, especially the Taylor comment, its just plain stupid. His Taylor comment that he lacks composure on the ball? That's an attribute that all good defenders should have. Quite a fair comment I feel. But because you disagree, he's a WUM? His comment about composure came in a total different sentence, didn't you see the . ? That means another sentence has started, thats how i read it anyway. "Expected alot from this young lad. But just another Peter Ramage, Steven Taylor. Big Tackler but lack of composure on the ball. GAve the ball away one to many times. But we'll wait and see." He implied Hunty would only ever become as good as Taylor, which is a fuking daft comment since Taylor is the best defender we've had in the EPL apart from Woodgate and he's only a nipper himself.

He seems like a blatant WUM to me, cant think how anyone would have any other opinion tbh. "Expected alot from this young lad. But just another Peter Ramage, Steven Taylor. Big Tackler but lack of composure on the ball. GAve the ball away one to many times. But we'll wait and see." He's played twice, expectations ruined after 180mins of watching him live. :roll: If he becomes another Steven Taylor then were laughing FFS. Defenders aren't known for their composure on the ball, more to do with their positioning off it. Most players come though out of position, especially CBs. Taylor & Ramage did here, Bramble did at Ipswich, Carragher did at Liverpool for years! Then he has a crack at Given FFS, this guy is a WUM, or fuking stupid. Wum? Think so. "But we'll wait and see" indicates that he's not a WUM and that he's simply putting his first impression across and is showing a willingness to keep an open mind and see if he's proved right or wrong. WUM-like behaviour? Erm, no. He then puts across a point about Shay's distribution. Which IS poor. It's NOT a lie or any kind of bullshit. He even makes a point in saying that it's the only flaw in his game. WUM-like behaviour? No, just an opinion he has. Certainly a WUM, and has done a good job on you thinking he isn't one, or your doing a good job Wummin' the mods to death in this thread Yet you can't point out any of the attributes that make him a WUM and have pointed out things that are actually just a difference in opinion. Its just a difference of opinion that you dont see him as a wum, and the rest of the board do. I've pointed out why i think he is, especially the Taylor comment, its just plain stupid.

This is good stuff considering. He's growing on me more each game, although i wasn't writing him off after a few games either, just trying to allow him time to get it right, and i think he's starting too. 6 goals in the EPL when we've been this shit is great, would like to see him in a proper fully fit NUFC team under a better quality manager, i think he'd be sensational. If he comes out with 15 goals IACs then i'd be very happy, 10+ in the league, great 1st season.

He seems like a blatant WUM to me, cant think how anyone would have any other opinion tbh. "Expected alot from this young lad. But just another Peter Ramage, Steven Taylor. Big Tackler but lack of composure on the ball. GAve the ball away one to many times. But we'll wait and see." He's played twice, expectations ruined after 180mins of watching him live. :roll: If he becomes another Steven Taylor then were laughing FFS. Defenders aren't known for their composure on the ball, more to do with their positioning off it. Most players come though out of position, especially CBs. Taylor & Ramage did here, Bramble did at Ipswich, Carragher did at Liverpool for years! Then he has a crack at Given FFS, this guy is a WUM, or fuking stupid. Wum? Think so. "But we'll wait and see" indicates that he's not a WUM and that he's simply putting his first impression across and is showing a willingness to keep an open mind and see if he's proved right or wrong. WUM-like behaviour? Erm, no. He then puts across a point about Shay's distribution. Which IS poor. It's NOT a lie or any kind of bullshit. He even makes a point in saying that it's the only flaw in his game. WUM-like behaviour? No, just an opinion he has. Certainly a WUM, and has done a good job on you thinking he isn't one, or your doing a good job Wummin' the mods to death in this thread

He seems like a blatant WUM to me, cant think how anyone would have any other opinion tbh. "Expected alot from this young lad. But just another Peter Ramage, Steven Taylor. Big Tackler but lack of composure on the ball. GAve the ball away one to many times. But we'll wait and see." He's played twice, expectations ruined after 180mins of watching him live. :roll: If he becomes another Steven Taylor then were laughing FFS. Defenders aren't known for their composure on the ball, more to do with their positioning off it. Most players come though out of position, especially CBs. Taylor & Ramage did here, Bramble did at Ipswich, Carragher did at Liverpool for years! Then he has a crack at Given FFS, this guy is a WUM, or fuking stupid. Wum? Think so.

oh dear! Even though Manure are proper cunts, i cant help smirk at Chelsea fuking up their title challenge. Hope they lose this game, and so far, they've done nowt to suggest they are going to win it. I'd be happy if they come to SJP in this downer mood.

No not really. Saviola has been poor about the same time Paddy K decided to give up on being a footballer. (about 3 years, that isn't just poor form anymore) He'd take longer than Martins or Luque to adapt, and yet again is another midget (5ft 5"), we do not need him, we have two £10m+ players like him who are better quality all round.

Well someone most will stick up for. Considering Babayaro apparently had another shite game yesterday its strange you pick on the young defender who came in did well and our fantastic keeper. WUM-tastic!!!!!!

Waste of money imo. Butt is a better player in this form. Also isn't duscher on a free end of season and his club struggling for cash? Butt is getting on a bit though, and we could do with another defensive midfielder. He is, but Duscher isn't the player we need tbh. I'd rather stick to a known quality DM than take a chance with another could-be flop from the Spanish leagues. In fact, i think we should never buy from Spain again, italy yes, france maybe, certainly Germany, but Spain, never again. Kluivert on a free? You said we should never buy from Spain as if we have never got a decent player from there. Kluivert on a free was a decent deal imo. Kluivert and the words free certainly dont go together. He cost £3.5m in wages for the year nevermind a loan fee if there was one (probably was) he also upset the balance and ended up putting Bellamy on the wings to accommodate him sparking Bellamys departure, was well worth bringing in. Can't think of anyone better we've signed from Spain, if that is the best we've done, then am certain we should never go La Liga again. I still wouldn't rule out buying from an entire league though, especialy when the player in question is argentinian anyway. The only players worth going for are all £15m plus in Spain. Its not feesable for us to go for the good ones, unless we get real lucky, and we all thought we did with Luque, and look how that turned out.

Aye, do i bother or not?

Waste of money imo. Butt is a better player in this form. Also isn't duscher on a free end of season and his club struggling for cash? Butt is getting on a bit though, and we could do with another defensive midfielder. He is, but Duscher isn't the player we need tbh. I'd rather stick to a known quality DM than take a chance with another could-be flop from the Spanish leagues. In fact, i think we should never buy from Spain again, italy yes, france maybe, certainly Germany, but Spain, never again. Kluivert on a free? You said we should never buy from Spain as if we have never got a decent player from there. Kluivert on a free was a decent deal imo. Kluivert and the words free certainly dont go together. He cost £3.5m in wages for the year nevermind a loan fee if there was one (probably was) he also upset the balance and ended up putting Bellamy on the wings to accommodate him sparking Bellamys departure, was well worth bringing in. Can't think of anyone better we've signed from Spain, if that is the best we've done, then am certain we should never go La Liga again.

Blah

Waste of money imo. Butt is a better player in this form. Also isn't duscher on a free end of season and his club struggling for cash? Butt is getting on a bit though, and we could do with another defensive midfielder. He is, but Duscher isn't the player we need tbh. I'd rather stick to a known quality DM than take a chance with another could-be flop from the Spanish leagues. In fact, i think we should never buy from Spain again, italy yes, france maybe, certainly Germany, but Spain, never again. Kluivert on a free?

Waste of money imo. Butt is a better player in this form. Also isn't duscher on a free end of season and his club struggling for cash? Butt is getting on a bit though, and we could do with another defensive midfielder. He is, but Duscher isn't the player we need tbh. I'd rather stick to a known quality DM than take a chance with another could-be flop from the Spanish leagues. In fact, i think we should never buy from Spain again, italy yes, france maybe, certainly Germany, but Spain, never again.

Waste of money imo. Butt is a better player in this form. Also isn't duscher on a free end of season and his club struggling for cash?

I think any money like that should be spent on a forward or an attacking midfield player and it would be madness to spend such an amount on a defender. It will be interesting to see how many other shit boards back their managers with 10m to go with 15m last summer as well. So you ARE Freddy then That's the mentality that has left us with Carr and Babayaro as first teamers. Why is it silly to spend that kind of money on a defender? because we need forwards more, or quality forwards more. And quality forwards cost more than quality defenders. Simple. Or should I say, simpleton. Anyway I thought you were against spending big money on "trophy" players ? Is this another of your "yeh but no but" statement similar to those you made about interfering with managers ? We don't need to splash out big on a striker yet IMO, we could get someone in who will do an adequate job till the summer fairly cheap then we have Owen back (and Shola but lets not get into that). Fact is we don't have adequate full backs and they should be priority! Funnily enough, its that simple. Well if you gave me a choice between a good full back for 5 or 6m quid or a good forward for 5 or 6m quid I would take the forward and I find it amazing that anyone would spend that amount of money on a defender first. Man Utd spent £28m on one freddy. They win cups. We don't. See a link? they also spent £30m on a forward............ And we spent £28m on two forwards, while being half the size (that being generous) of Manure. Our ENTIRE defense is worth £8m - Huntington, Carr (£2m), Ramage, Taylor, Moore, Bramble (£5m), Bernard, Babayaro £1m) There is a slight unbalance here, wonder what it is?