Zero

Batshuayi to Dortmund, loan.

We won't have any more signings, except for may be one more loan deal.

I think it is kinda surprising that Rafa didn't cover himself up when signing the contract as we expected back in two years ago.

yep like suck the last drop of cash from the clubs coffers and sell when the window closes. Once again though, the £250m valuation previously offered would be based on the fact he didn't bleed the club dry of cash I'd imagine. If he reaps £100m out this summer they're not still going to offer him the same price like. Not really, it's quite complicated but even if the fat c*** milk 100m out this year, the valuation of our club would not go down by that much. Won't be exact but they'll not offer the same money, not a f***ing chance man. I know, but in fact the same can be said on the opposite side. For example, the fat c*** spend 20m on Jorgensen. The valuation of Jorgensen from the buyers view may not be 20m and thus create further differences. I genuinely not surprised we spend nth this money as long as the fat c*** is really willing to sell. jorgensen would be an asset on the books and his value would be in the books determined by amortisation so it's totally different No, you got it wrong. The valuation of the club in a takeover in fact reference very little to the current accounting books. Most of the time, it only relates to: 1. Fixed assets like infranstructures 2. Reputation 3. Revenue generated per year and running cost per year 4. Additional investment cost needed The fat c*** would certainly add that 20m in his asking price because that's the additional cost he incurred during the takeover event. However as you can see from the above, it only affects the last point. If Amanda didn't value him as much, then she would definitely not agree to increase the bidding price for further 20m. That's why during the process of any takeover, all kinds of transfer will be banned. happy to be told i'm wrong, certainly don't claim to be an expert but wouldn't taking £100m out of the club or spending £100m on new players now impact #4? certainly seems like it would to me but then what do i know There must be impact if the fat cunt did take 100m worth cash out of the club, but right now what he did is stop all further investment (I.e. All transfer funds since last summer) only, and by doing so the club didn't really lose 100m in value, and we continue to stay up without investment the club would save 100m and generate huge profit (and of course would use to pay back his loan). That's the tricky point, and the gamble the fat cunt is taking. Fucking shit. And in relation to 100m on new players, the problem is say the fat cunt did spend 20m on Jorgensen. Very logical to think the fat cunt would increase the asking price to 320m (just say) right? But in buyers view 1. Jorgensen may not worth 20m, or 2. Jorgenson isn't good enough and we still need to buy new strikers, and in such scenario the buyer would not agree to increase the bid as much as 20m. Therefore these transfers would always lead to larger differences in takeover price. To be honest if Amanda did prepare 200m on new transfer, do you think Rafa would not buy a new striker? I think Rafa would just rebuild the team completely except Lascelles.

Too long to quote. In a way yes, or else why is there a news re Amanda and Ashley agreed to reimburse the transfer fees spend in Jan back in Nov? Normally this shouldn't be the case, and it isn't surprising that the agreement collapsed.

yep like suck the last drop of cash from the clubs coffers and sell when the window closes. Once again though, the £250m valuation previously offered would be based on the fact he didn't bleed the club dry of cash I'd imagine. If he reaps £100m out this summer they're not still going to offer him the same price like. Not really, it's quite complicated but even if the fat c*** milk 100m out this year, the valuation of our club would not go down by that much. Won't be exact but they'll not offer the same money, not a f***ing chance man. I know, but in fact the same can be said on the opposite side. For example, the fat c*** spend 20m on Jorgensen. The valuation of Jorgensen from the buyers view may not be 20m and thus create further differences. I genuinely not surprised we spend nth this money as long as the fat c*** is really willing to sell. jorgensen would be an asset on the books and his value would be in the books determined by amortisation so it's totally different No, you got it wrong. The valuation of the club in a takeover in fact reference very little to the current accounting books. Most of the time, it only relates to: 1. Fixed assets like infranstructures 2. Reputation 3. Revenue generated per year and running cost per year 4. Additional investment cost needed The fat cunt would certainly add that 20m in his asking price because that's the additional cost he incurred during the takeover event. However as you can see from the above, it only affects the last point. If Amanda didn't value him as much, then she would definitely not agree to increase the bidding price for further 20m. That's why during the process of any takeover, all kinds of transfer will be banned.

yep like suck the last drop of cash from the clubs coffers and sell when the window closes. Once again though, the £250m valuation previously offered would be based on the fact he didn't bleed the club dry of cash I'd imagine. If he reaps £100m out this summer they're not still going to offer him the same price like. Not really, it's quite complicated but even if the fat c*** milk 100m out this year, the valuation of our club would not go down by that much. Won't be exact but they'll not offer the same money, not a f***ing chance man. I know, but in fact the same can be said on the opposite side. For example, the fat cunt spend 20m on Jorgensen. The valuation of Jorgensen from the buyers view may not be 20m and thus create further differences. I genuinely not surprised we spend nth this money as long as the fat cunt is really willing to sell.

yep like suck the last drop of cash from the clubs coffers and sell when the window closes. Once again though, the £250m valuation previously offered would be based on the fact he didn't bleed the club dry of cash I'd imagine. If he reaps £100m out this summer they're not still going to offer him the same price like. Not really, it's quite complicated but even if the fat cunt milk 100m out this year, the valuation of our club would not go down by that much.

If other party just want to pay 250m max, what the fat cunt can do is to milk money from us as much as possible before the takeover.

As I said, it makes a lot of sense from the fat cunts point of view to not spending any money now, if he really wants to sell the club. The logic is simple: use all the clubs money to pay back his loan, and thus top up the money he will receive from Amanda, just like what Dave said. In other words, the reason why he is willing to cut his asking price from 400m to 300m (if you believe media report) is because he determines to milk 100m out from the club this year, which he is doing now by cutting all spending.

The Gamez signing is equally questionable.

You may disagree but I do think Mitro @ 2 years ago was better than Gayle this year. Joselu is debatable.

That's why I said sell him asap to any parties in order to facilitate bringing in a new striker, Brighton included.

You should question his intention if he signs on.

We literally have no striker on book. One completely out of depth, one who doesn't know how to score, and one who would never be picked.

I don't want to work in that boundaries either but who got the power to change it? None. The fact is Rafa has to led us fight against relegation under such horrible boundaries. Simply as that. The relationship between Rafa and Mitro is basically done. One doesn't want to keep but no choice. One doesn't want to play but no choice. And yea we all assuming he has attitude problem now. Then would you want to play him when we badly need him say under injury crisis? You still trust this guy? Seriously? Okay so we basically got only two strikers on book. And we didn't recoup "potential" 10m which may be added to facilitate the Jorgensen deal, or bringing in a better one, or got an additional GK, etc. That's really a bad decision, or you could say it's the result of bad management. If Rafa doesn't want to play him like that, just sold him last summer FFS.

It is NOT the time to change something that you cannot change unless you ask Rafa to give ultimatum to the fat c***. Which I am fine in fact. Would you support that? If not, then Rafa has to get the best out of resources on hand within a week. Keeping 10m unused is a fuckingbad idea.

Who says we badly need money? Who says th emoney would go towards those positions anyway? Stop making things up. If he really wants out bad enought hen his agent can find a club abroad. Otherwise maybe his agent should ask him to start pulling his weight if he wants to play. It's always correct to say the fat cunt is a fat cunt but let's be brutally honest the chance of buying someone after we sold Mitro must be higher than keeping him right? Look at Darlow, look at Elliot, look at Diame, look at Joselu and Gayle. We bloody need to get someone in to replace these shits ASAP. And you left a potential 10m unused now? He already said he wants to leave, what else you want more? Tell him to give out his all in training now? He would just say fuck off I am done, and rightly so after such treatment from Rafa.

Sometimes the support or the blind belief in Rafa is really horrible. How can you support the idea of keeping a player when everyone including him knows you don't want him to be here? And rely on him when we have injury crisis? Oh yea fucking professional he must be. Not strengthening our rivals? When we badly need money for bringing in a striker or goalkeeper? No.10? Or you truely believe his value will rocket after six months of frozen out? Come on man. Supporting Rafa as our manager doesn't mean we need to portrait everything he done is right.

You know what, people "trusting Rafa" on this issue when that day is not a match day, and people would question why we don't play Mitro after seeing how shit Gayle and Joselu are playing in match.

Thanks for your input. It looks very worrying to be honest.

Aye. selke over Jorgensen everyday for me.

And now the replacement is a Dutch 27 years old. People still think we should sell Mitro then?

Likely because people wonder who is better Mitro or Jorgensen?

Bruno Peres 8m from Roma.