Jump to content

Shak

Moderator
  • Posts

    42,964
  • Joined

Everything posted by Shak

  1. Shak

    Vurnon Anita

    http://coltmonday.files.wordpress.com/2011/02/feels-good-man-goat-squint-12883904505.jpg
  2. Neither have ever kicked a ball in the Premiership man, if they prove capable then great but I don't feel at all comfortable relying on them. Bigi has played a lot of games in the CC and seems to be a great talent. I wouldn´t have any problems at all to play him. Funny enough you have to make your debut sometime. That, and that I rather play him than Raylor, Gosling or perch in midfield. He's 18 man, you want him to come on as a sub a few times and look comfortable and maybe play a few cup games before you have him in the first team, expecting him to run the midfield against one of the best teams in the league. Think some people are getting carried away with this idea of us having some promising youngsters for the first time in forever. Truth is that most of them won't make it, if we get one or two first team players from the group of Tav, Good, Ferguson, Abeid, Bigirimana, Vuckic, Sammy and the others then we'll have done well.
  3. Neither have ever kicked a ball in the Premiership man, if they prove capable then great but I don't feel at all comfortable relying on them.
  4. Shak

    sunderland

    Sessesgnon would be a brilliant signing tbh, would love him here. Would never happen though. That Sky Sports ad about the Ji goal against Man City is amazing btw, the fucking cut of your man.
  5. Aye, actually enforce the rules and book anyone who talks back even at all. Couple of weeks of that and the problem would be solved.
  6. The neck on him of all people calling anybody ugly.
  7. Ba on the right?! He'll love that. That starting eleven is what I expect though.
  8. Produce some really good technical players Mexico. Fuck Mexico.
  9. Shak

    Vurnon Anita

    I don't see why Marveaux can't play in the centre of midfield for a few games, even though I think he'd be far more suited to playing wide. The kids may not be up to playing too many games but they are going to have to play sometime or they'll never progress and I'd rather take a risk in midfield than in defence or up front. The only time we'll know if the kids are good enough is by playing them, we don't need to play the kids for a full season as we have Tiote and Cabaye. Like I've said, if we bring in the other players that we need then this is a good signing. And what if Cabaye or Tiote gets a serious injury and are out for months on end? We need another CM, and signing one who can also play LB has to be a good thing as even if we sign Debuchy and sell Simpson we have no depth at fullback. As for the kids needing a chance, how is that any different for the likes of Tavernier and Good in defence?
  10. Great finish tbf, hit it sweetly.
  11. Shak

    Vurnon Anita

    Our only backup to our two main forwards is an injury-prone 1 goal in every 5 games player. I'd prefer to use any of Abeid, Marveaux, Bigirimana or Amalfitano in midfield for a few games than have to rely on Williamson again at the centre of defence. Marveaux isn't a CM IMO, at least not in a two man central midfield. Amalfitano we don't know much about, so perhaps you can make a case for him. As for chucking in one of the kids, I think some people are getting carried away with us actually having some promising youth prospects for the first time in forever. I like having them in the squad, but chucking them in before they're ready isn't the way to go.
  12. Shak

    Vurnon Anita

    How is it any different from signing a striker or a CB then? A fullback is the most pressing need, most people would agree on that. You could make a case that Williamson is a more competent backup at CB than any of our squad CM's would be if Tiote or Cabaye went down. You might make the same case for Shola at CF.
  13. Shak

    Vurnon Anita

    Will be delighted with this signing if it happens, our depth at fullback and CM is more or less non-existent. Yes we need other signings, and hopefully we get them, but a CM was also very much needed. The fact that he can cover at fullback only makes it all the more attractive.
  14. Shak

    sunderland

    Hope they do sign McGeady like, he's never played a good game for Ireland. Ever.
  15. He's fine as the 4th choice winger in the squad. He's mostly shite, but at least gives us some width and teams do have to be concerned about his pace. I'd start him on the wing ahed of Raylor. If Marveaux is fit we should be OK on the flanks with him, Jonas and Ben Arfa battling for two spots and Obertan getting the odd run out here and there. That's a very big if though.
  16. Shak

    Vurnon Anita

    Midfielder isn't he? Yeah the fact that he can play LB as well as CM is really attractive. Can't understand why some people think CM isn't a real need, we only have 2 at the moment. I'd feel more confident starting Williamson at CB than I would depending on any of the youngsters or playing the likes of Raylor in CM. With Guthrie gone we could certainly do with another central mid. If anything happens to Tiote or Cabs you'll be relying on kids. Aye, Jonas can do a job there as part of a three in the middle but I wouldn't fancy him alongside Cabaye or Tiote in a 4-4-2.
  17. Shak

    Vurnon Anita

    Midfielder isn't he? Yeah the fact that he can play LB as well as CM is really attractive. Can't understand why some people think CM isn't a real need, we only have 2 at the moment. I'd feel more confident starting Williamson at CB than I would depending on any of the youngsters or playing the likes of Raylor in CM.
×
×
  • Create New...