SEMTEX

they probably could've done with spreading those shots over 4 games tbh

Don't be calling Nigeria shit fam. Couldn't even get to the World Cup final marra. Must be shit.

Germany are shit iyam. Narrowly beat a shite argentina team in the final. Argentina only beat a shite netherlands team, a shite belgium team and a shite switzerland team. Having qualified against a shite nigeria team a shite bosnia team and a shite iran team. Germany themselves only managed to beat a shite host nation, a shite frog side, a shite Algerian team (AFTER EXTRA TIME - SHITE!), and they couldnt even beat a shite Ghana side in the group stage. SHITE.

That's just nonsense Calling Spain weak for a starters and also Argentina were not the first decent side they faced in the knockouts Spain lost every game except for a win against Australia. Basically, everyone was shit apart from Germany and Argentina, therefore Holland are also SHIT.

Aye, Costa Rica who managed to qualify ahead of Italy, England & Uruguay.

:lol: :lol: Literally, World Cup semis? Fuckin' shite.

World Cup final followed by World Cup semis. SHITE.

Makes you wonder why every Ajax fan under the sun was ranting about him going to a shite club like NUFC when he could be playing at a much higher level.

I hear he's got the media presence of Jose Mourinho, the tactical nous of Pep Guardiola, the experience of Carlo Ancelloti, the englishness of anyone born in england, the arse of Beyonce and the tits of Scarlett Johansson. He's no John Carver though.

He wont suffer because he wont give a shit given time.

That's what he's good at, and no, he isn't a particularly versatile midfield player. He shouldn't be in our team right now because we don't play in a way that will actually utilize him. However, I'd prefer to stubbornly hope we change our style of play, rather than remove him for a lesser option. ( / keep colback in the team)

Given there is seven packages, it would be pretty unfathomable if they were to get less than four. To be honest, I like Sky's coverage and I am pretty happy with the service. If a third or fourth broadcaster gets packages the price to watch everything will go through the roof. Consumer can't really win. The only way it can work in the favour of the consumer, or viewer, is to have a pay per view service where you pay a reasonable amount for the games you want to see, regardless of which channel they are broadcast. It is pretty straightforward to watch every game of your chosen club live via the interweb already - sometimes the quality is not great of course. If there was a way to watch the games I wanted to watch in HD quality for a sensible price I would be interested.. Not the 10 Pound per day option you can currently get, I can have the channel for a month for that amount with the rest of my Sky package. The cost per game should be 2- 3 Quids max!! If you were able to individually subscribe to each channel/reasonable set of channels (ie all sky sports channels), this would probably work out for the consumer just fine. I'd probably survive on BBCetc + Sky Sports + BT Sports, I'd pay less money because none of my money is going towards the other random filler shite, and Sky etc would mark up the price of those channels. Win-win. Get er done.

nee footy videos allowed like, get rid

Yup. He's done perfectly fine at times, at his very limited role of ye olde style centre back. But if you look at his overall catalog of work for us, it's safe to say he's pretty shit. Obviously TCP knows this, but just likes to say annoying shit, because that's his thing.

Until we stop consistently bypassing any deeper midfield play, his stats are going to be mediocre, doesn't change a thing about his abilities. He's never going to be flashy but he can be a very useful tool, should we ever play in a manner that utilizes central midfield.

Saying it four hundred times doesn't make it any more true marra. Time to shut your pie hole.

When soldiers are bringing in 52 thousand week-in week-out, i'll start thinking about a pay-rise.

Might be a stretch to say that's a football post mind you.

Soldiers rarely carry on after they get their arms blown off. They tend to seek medical attention. On the flip-side, their bet was spot on.

I'd be fine with him publicly acknowledging it if asked, but if he was really giving it the big one about how it's "not on" then that is to the max.

I think I hate Claude Makelele. He ruined everything.

It actually doesn't say it all.

I wouldn't even have an "ideal midfield", any 4 out of Abeid/Sissoko/Anita/Cabella/De Jong would work fine, filling the 2*CM,1*AM,1*RW positions. I guess you mix it up depending upon who you're against but in reality they won't all be fit anyway. Sissoko in AM if Anita & Abeid start, else in CM. Colback can be involved every so often too, but I guess it'd be him or Anita, and I have much more hope of Anita improving over time.

If you could just add the acceptable opinion into the title of every thread it would save time. Or better yet, have a sticky with a summary of views that are alright. Would save you all the one-sentence dismissals at least. But then what else would he do?!!? Don't starve him of his bread and butter.