Mick

I'm not sure that Roeder is an improvement over Souness, he's no worse though.

Try this: http://www.booking.com/searchresults.html?aid=303948;label=newcastle-upon-tyne-u2Qim4JteAKsiCbCgyJCyQS718545501;sid=07c501f9415b1b1d83c283ceb282d28b;landmark=11847

how many is that?And is a long way from the hotel to the stadion? He's extracting the urine.

I'm sure you will have replied to that phantom post so have a look in here http://www.newcastle-online.com/nufcforum/index.php?action=profile;u=1711;sa=showPosts it shows all of your posts since the day that you registered. Re: the denial of a straight question comment, you're the master at that one, I can only guess that you have some setting in your profile that stops you from seeing your own posts.

Spot on. Spot on about it being spot on.

Mackems followed by Man U.

The injuries excuse was used again tonight in the local rag.

HAahahahahahahahaa!! you were probably one of the "i support Souness/Roeder because he's the manager of the club and we have to support the club" nobheads weren't you. No I wasn't actually. I believe that Roeder should be criticised but not disliked and hated because at the end of the day he is a nice man who is way out of his depth. How old are you little boy? I bet you've bought the new kit haven't you! You are probably one of these little fickle chav supporters aren't you. The ones who boo and give NUFC a bad name!!! Gan smoke some dope you thick c*** Remember the old bloke who went to the match during the 70's with a black and white suit? That's Northern Monkey.

Most of them are OK.

You really are a one off, or three off if all of your other known personalities are taking into account. Do you seriously think that anybody would deny final league places?

You said: Show me where I've said this, then we can move on to another petty argument.

You didn't need to bump it, I've seen the first one. I don't know about you but I have to be online to read something.

I would agree denying them would be sad, who did that? you did. You say the current board are "no different". Anyone can see the huge difference in performance of the club if you look and compare the positions. See this. http://www.newcastle-online.com/nufcforum/index.php?topic=38878.msg794632#msg794632 The surprise is that macbeth didnt' reply to this post. The points are fairly straightforward. Before you start harping on about "defending" anyone, please tell is if this comment taken from teh above post is fact or not. Do you also think the board are "collectively responsible" for rescuing the club from certain relegation to the old 3rd division, 15000 crowds, selling their best players, being unable to raise money from a share issue even to the amount that we sold Peter Beardsley to Liverpool for, playing in the Champions League, achieving 3 consecutive top 5 league positions for the first time in over 50 years, building a new training facility that previous boards had failed to achieve for almost a century, and expanding and developing the stadium which all the previous boards had also failed to do ? If you dispute these facts, thus concluding the current board is the same as the old board, please tell us which part of the above is incorrect, thus leading to you making your "opinion". You never know, macbeth may turn up, as he's already ignored it. What does any of this have to do with me not denying 30 years worth of league positions?

Funny how you reply to his post after he puts his picture in his avatar, anything we need to know about?

I agree with the first two posts but I'm not convinced that anything will happen, Shepherd said that the appointment of Roeder was the most important decision he'd had to make since becoming chairman, is he now going to admit that he got the most important decision wrong? Shepherd also said that Roeder got the job on the back of thousands of texts, I'm yet to meet any of these missing thousands. Again, I don't know if he'll admit that this was also wrong. My guess is that Roeder will still be here at the beginning of next season and we might splash more cash in a desperate attempt to make Roeder look like a manager. I know the silence from within St James' is unusual but that's probably just an attempt to save face if Roeder goes before his contract is up.

I can only remember three caretakers getting the managers job at Newcastle, Richard Dinnis,Willie McFaul and now Roeder, none of the three have done any good once appointed.

i think that was played a massive part - combine it with the socalled honeymoon period, and maybe that fact that roeder had shearer keeping the lads in line - and we have the difference over this season... i'd love to see shearer manage this club someday. there is no reason why keano can do the job and shearer cannot. but right now i dont really know what our best option would be... Good or even great players don't always become good or great managers.

FFS may not have answered e-mails but he's responded to them, here's the proof. http://icnewcastle.icnetwork.co.uk/newcastleunited/news/tm_objectid=17089825&method=full&siteid=50081&headline=glenn-was-fans--choice-name_page.html

Our end of season performances were down to the souness has fu***d off factor.

It doesn't matter what people on here want, only one moron has any say on him going or staying, unless the Halls show an interest.

Sorted.

I would agree denying them would be sad, who did that?

You're itching to post them aren't you, you've threatened to do it twice this week, sad as owt.

I'll chip in for some basic English tuition as well. I can think of at least one person on here tonight who would be more deserving.