Dogmatix

Wishful think, I know, but £350m might start to look attractive to someone trying to make something out of HoF.

I reckon 2 in a row beats six in a row

This has 88th minute equaliser all over it. You weren't wrong by much

Relegrayson, love it.

He is just too much of a liability.

Look North reckoned that sunderland had given away 20,000 tickets. Did I hear Dawn right ?

Josh King anyone ?

"Mag in the bookies" is the latest in the long running series.

The Newcastle Evening Chronicle does exactly the same thing. I think it is just inconsiderate.

Pretty weird that your name is the twitter handle of an obscure rock band formed in 2010 by the mackem in YCNI:M and The Automatic... Zero Worship is freaking amazing Yep, your average 65 year old uses phrases like ''Zero Worship is freaking amazing'' all the time. You sad little child.

Is this the same guy who told us, that his wife was so very homesick, that he would have to go back to Germany. Then signed for Liverpool ? I usually file this sort under ''Lying Twat ''

Up to now, I think we are doing well, against a team that is top of the league. There is definately an improvement... but it's early days.

In a strange way it makes me appreciate Rudd Gullit. He held his hands up resigned and walked. All without aggitating for compensation. Even though his reign was hardly any good for us. He, unlike others had a modicum of integrity.

Who's paying for the waal? I'll chip in.

He is a f*cking child molester !!!! and you think thats harsh.

If you are summoned to court, you HAVE to go. I'm just summising here, but, perhaps the prosecution think they have enough without his evidence. possibly the defense would rather not have him on the stand. For whatever reason. BTW are Fletcher and Johnson good mates ? He wasn't a prosecution witness, he was a defence witness. Johnson told the court that Fletcher refused to come to court after his guilty pleas, which begs the question as to why Johnson was "so honest" with SAFC and his girlfriend - but failed to tell one of his good mates. I have no idea why he wasn't summoned to court, especially as he was a witness for Johnson. I tried to cover all points without being too obvious. Perhaps the defence did not want Mr J and Mr M singing from seperate hymn sheets.

If you are summoned to court, you HAVE to go. I'm just summising here, but, perhaps the prosecution think they have enough without his evidence. possibly the defense would rather not have him on the stand. For whatever reason. BTW are Fletcher and Johnson good mates ?

You can rightly sack someone, provided you have genuine belief (in this case, an admission) that they have committed a serious offence and it impacts the company (serious damage to reputation). Any two-bit lawyer knows this, and the club would have been informed of this fact. The fact that the let him play, let alone sack him, shows that they would rather play a known child sex offender than risk relegation. This is absolutely wrong, and the club should be heavily fined. When other fans (rightly) lay into the mackems with paedo chants, they will not have a leg to stand on. By continuing to support the club, the are supporting an organisation that has knowingly harboured a paedophile. They really are a disgusting club. Not to mention a sizeable minority of their fans chanting things that attempted to made a joke of the situation. Good on some of their fans who stood up and said it was disgraceful. What they have done is morally reprehensible, but not illegal. I'm sure football fans across the country will let them know what they think.

YES

If Sunderland had sacked him before the trial started, they would have prejudiced his case. i.e., ''his club sacked him therefore he is guilty''. He would then have been in a position to claim that he could not get an unbiased jury. As the case would have been seen to have been pre-judged, and MAY have been able to walk away from it all Everyone is entitled to a fair trial, and you are supposed to be innocent until proved otherwise. That applies to everyone, even if you are scum and lower than a snakes belly. Sunderland would have had legal advice on how to conduct themselves. As soon as he pleaded guilty to two counts, Sunderland could then sack him.

On fire tbh

Who gans to Watford for a Chinese, like? Me and Andros Just go on Justeat, they deliver. Nah the don't, just chicken, pork or beef.

Newcastle After Top Swiss Midfielder Granit Xhaka ...from a paste and copy site, I know. But I would sign him just for his name alone

did you watch the game? this seems like an emo note to failure from someone who didn't watch what unfolded Yeah, I watched it until 2-0. The referee was terrible yes, but I think looking at the referee is just a sidenote. Pre-Pardew/Ashley Newcastle teams 1-0 down and a man down would have fought back to a 1-1 against a team as pitiful as that, shit ref or not. looking at the referee is a sidenote? you've all lost it, totally lost it like You'd have a point if we'd lost 1-0. It is a sidenote, as I've said, pre Pardew/Ashley teams would have fought back for a draw in that situation against a team as shit as that. Do you disagree with that point? I thought we did try to fight back, should have equalised but then ended up conceding more goals while chasing the game. Pretty hard to fight back when you are behind and down to 10 men. If the score was 0-0 then that's a different matter, we could just took a striker off and defended. Totally agree.