Jump to content

Dogmatix

Member
  • Posts

    530
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Dogmatix

  1. Dogmatix

    sunderland

    He then shit on the Mackums and agitated for a transfer, by basically playing crap. Until he got his desired move to Man City. Lovely, lovely person by all accounts
  2. Dogmatix

    Loïc Remy

    Would be nice if Ashley was to find out if Remy has a release clause, price etc. Then let the rest of the country know exactly what it is. Just so 'Arry knows what it feels like.
  3. Can't see it being that if QPR have activated it. Why not ? Fernandes is reputed to be worth over $400 million, and he is bankrolling the club. Having said that, when he gets bored and walks away QPR are going to right in it up to their necks.
  4. Dogmatix

    sunderland

    I agree that thread is an abomination. After N'Diaye who are the other three? Yes I did fall into the 'Poirot' trap. Perhaps I should have said French-based. But you knew what I meant and resorted to nit-picking.Surely you are not condoning the arrant racism of that thread because I got the numbers wrong. Akin to shouting racist abuse at a players mother, OK because it was only one players mother. Shame, you were shaping up as quite sensible and now you have to go back and start all over At what point did I condone racism? I said that the thread was an abomination and have never uttered a racial slur in my life. I was just confused as to which French players you were referring. I do apologise if I've offended you in some way. As for Bent's mother, if you want to tar all our fans with the same brush then go ahead. I don't find racism acceptable and said as much in my first few posts on here. Well I played a blinder there with that reply. I was referring to the thread on RTG and not to you. Reading it back it does not make that clear. So my apologies to you as it was not my intention to infer that you were making racist remakes.
  5. Dogmatix

    sunderland

    I agree that thread is an abomination. After N'Diaye who are the other three? Yes I did fall into the 'Poirot' trap. Perhaps I should have said French-based. But you knew what I meant and resorted to nit-picking.Surely you are not condoning the arrant racism of that thread because I got the numbers wrong. Akin to shouting racist abuse at a players mother, OK because it was only one players mother. Shame, you were shaping up as quite sensible and now you have to go back and start all over
  6. Dogmatix

    sunderland

    http://www.readytogo.net/smb/showthread.php?t=757441 They have four French players in their own team. The mentality of that lot never fails to astound me
  7. If he thinks that was real booing, wait until he warms up on the side lines. Sincerely hope he takes it to heart. Waste of skin gangsta wannabe
  8. Dogmatix

    sunderland

    I have seen the twat in Shiremoor.
  9. name one player on our first team squad who is here for the love of the club and not because we offered them the best deal. Nah, you point out the bit where I said he was the only one.
  10. Any time he wanted he could have signed and had that clause removed. He was never going to stay, and we can't make him. His loyalty is to money and not Newcastle United.Thanks for the goals, Demba. But I for one will be happier not to have the Sword of Damocles threatening every transfer window
  11. Don't take me home, please don't take me home, I just don't want to go to work Let me stay here, drink all the beer (not sure on that line) Please, please, please don't take me home. Fucking woeful. Tune is the same as the Cabaye song. The tune is ''Achy breaky heart'' Billy Ray Cyrus. ( a bit embarrassed that I knew that)
  12. Dogmatix

    sunderland

    Can I suggest that N.O. has a special New Years Award for Brummie. This poster has been absolutely outstanding in all of his posts about MON. To be able to tell us, from the moment he was appointed, EXACTLY how it would all pan out has been uncanny. He has even told us to the minute when MON will make his subs, how he would set out his team, and how the wheels would come off. Well done Sir, take a bow.
  13. Dogmatix

    sunderland

    Lots of pink seats on show on MotD.
  14. Dogmatix

    sunderland

    I just love the fact that the SMB has spent half the week taking the piss out of our mid-week attendance and the injuries we sustained. Then their heroes turn out a performance like that. It gives me a warm inner glow.
  15. Dogmatix

    sunderland

    Nah, I am far too old to have a name like Zac. That's the bullshit we have been dealing with since he walked out on us. Constantly told he worked miracles, didn't spend too much, was forced out by Lerner etc etc. It fucked a lot of people off down here. As for 6th, 6th, 6th, no it's not bad. I understand that it might be the holy grail for a club like Sunderland to finish as high as sixth, but if MON was a miracle worker for doing that, what was David O'Leary for doing it with no money? What about the fact that between 1996 and 2002 we were never out of the top eight? A period which included 4th, 5th and 6th in successive seasons? And which also included a cup win? We've finished in the top six in only just less than half of the seasons since the PL was invented in 1992, so really, it's decent, but not stratospheric. Just like you finishing in the top six. The difference is, under MON it took an absolute huge amount of money to do, and there was not even the slightest nod or wink paid to the importance of building for the future, nothing at all. I'd also point out that there's a commoin misconception that MON came here and we had a dreadful squad, nothing to work with, as we'd just had a terrible season. Utter fucking nonsense. He had Sorensen, Delaney, Mellberg, Laursen, Bouma, Barry, Agbonlahor, Angel and Baros. We also had Gary Cahill who had just broken into the first team. That was not at all bad as the spine of a team, and you could probably make a decent argument that despite spending Champions League money, and CL wages, we now have a championship squad which is weaker than what was here when he arrived. I just dont get it. Why do these pundits think we go on about this? Do they think it's bitterness? Why? Because he left? It's nothing to do with him leaving, it is about the state he left us in, and the circumstances in which the self centred bag of shit did it. 6th 6th 6th, the number of the beast. Could Marty be Satan ??
  16. Just a few things that spring to mind :- Its OK for Southerners (Chelsea fans included) to use the phrase ' Northern Monkeys' I wonder what the Association of Black Lawyers would think of an organisation called The White Football Supporters Association You can't refer to someone being black if you are white, only if you are black! I have been known to use the phrase 'Cheeky Monkey' is that racist ?
  17. I thought, today. that Mr. Quinn showed his undying love for SAFC.................. by turning up at Loftus Rd. I would love to know the real reason why he walked out on them.
  18. Dogmatix

    Kick It Out

    I see that the police have charged a resident of Washington today, for sending Shola racial tweets this week. I wonder what team he supports.
  19. Saylor, Santon and HBA 0-3 . They will be leaping, lemming-like, into the Wear.
  20. Dogmatix

    sunderland

    Time, perhaps, for another photo comparison thread. They loved the last one.
  21. I don't believe that Wonga have paid anything to 'rename' the stadium. That is what I said
  22. Sports Direct advertising will be removed from the OUTSIDE but stay on the inside. After all the match day TV only sees the inside. Come on lads, you don't really think that Wonga have so generously decided to pay for the naming rights to the stadium and decided not use them Just for the fans sake . It is nothing but a sop, to make us accept this poisonous company. Wonga have paid for the shirt rights nothing more, the rest is smoke and mirrors courtesy of Lambias and Ashley.
  23. Dogmatix

    sunderland

    Sorry mate that article is so full of holes it is like a journalistic sieve. How many people refuse to eat bacon ?? It was a stupid throw away line on an equally stupid program. Newcastle did hold the Royal Charter as far as coal was concerned, and it did cause a great deal of pain and animosity. That much is true. Newcastle was Royalist, only in so much that the castle was invested with troops under the Marquess of Newcastle, who were there to protect the coal supplies The ordinary people were not allowed into the castle, and offered no protection from it. The ordinary man was more than likely a Roundhead sympathiser, but you don't publicise that view to loudly with the enemy army on your front lawn. Durham, the Bishop and County Durham was also Royalist, and had troops, there was also a garrison at South Shields. If Sunderland had been a Roundhead base it would have been crushed in short order and wiped from the map. A Scottish Army came down to capture Newcastle, and to effectively cut off coal supplies to the rest of the country. The Scots were repulsed . They then attacked small towns, villages and communication lines. The Royalists from Newcastle and Durham and Shield went out to meet them, to stop them destroying and killing the unprotected. This includes Sunderland, which was being raped by the 'old enemy' The only connection with Sunderland was that the Scottish army , under Earl of Leven retired there during the Battle of Boldon Hill, while the Royalists retired to Durham. The Scots used Sunderland as a supply base, in reality they marched in and took what they wanted. To imagine that a secret Roundhead alliance welcomed them in is laughable, Sunderland was occupied by a foreign army who ransacked the place. The Scots were highly unlikely to allow Englishman to join in with them. The Scots were not just fighting the Royalist but moreover killing Englishmen and hoping to retain any land that they held. That is not to say one or two looters did not tag on to the Scots coattails, while the Scots took what they needed from Sunderland. There were no Roundhead troops based in Sunderland because it was of no strategic importance what so ever. To say that there was a Scottish / Sunderland alliance is ridiculous in the extreme. More like history been airbrushed out of shame. The Royalist Army was not raised from Newcastle. They were Royalist supporters from further afield, only stationed there to thwart the Scots The Royalists and Scots fought over 4 days and retreated back to Durham and Sunderland respectively. There was no outright victory to either side as the Battle of Selby ( a Royalist defeat) forced both sides south. Newcastle was NOT taken at that time by a Scottish army and a handful of Mackems. Although a Scottish army did occupy Newcastle AFTER the Royalist defeat at Marston Moor. Only the Mackems could try and turn this imagined traitorous act of siding with an invading army as so kind of virtue, especially when you think of what the Scots did in Sunderland over those four days.
×
×
  • Create New...