-
Posts
15,083 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Everything posted by Minhosa
-
It'll be Batshauyi on loan imho.
-
Indeed. A total and utter compliant yes man. Can't stand the guy.
-
Wonder if it will push out some of their promising younger British players. Abraham will be 2nd choice at best, Tomori hasn't played much, and even Mount might struggle to hold down a place consistently I'd love a player like Mount at NUFC, same with Loftus-Cheek too. We wanted him under Rafa from memory.
-
I can think of one number 9 he'll have no problem keeping up with :lol: .
-
Sounds ideal for BruceBall.
-
Joke isn't it? :lol: . Bruceosaurus will be tearing his hair out now because he already knows most of us don't rate him. He'll know he's in for a season of hell next year without a takeover.
-
From that full statement it looked like he was sitting on the fence tbh and supporting both sides. probably can't say much more publicly in case of being accused of government interference in football which brings down fifa like a ton of bricks The KSA relationship is gonna be huge in a post-Brexit world for BJ. I'm amazed he hasn't had it forced through to be quite honest.
-
From that full statement it looked like he was sitting on the fence tbh and supporting both sides. Agree. I think too many folks are jumping on the 'now we've got Boris on side' rhetoric when his response indicates nothing of the sort imho. I mean, yeah, great for the profile of our case etc, sure but actual support? Nope.
-
That would be one way but, from what I've read, that would require the process to start again. With Ashley. With the PL. Also, I always believed that the Reubens were only really present for the real estate angle and didn't foresee bunging in much of the running costs. 10% is a drop in the ocean. Realistically, the club needs way over £600m to purchase it, fund it and then develop the infrastructure. Arguably, closer to a billion. Would they wanna drop 1/18 of their wealth on a football club? I can't see it.
-
Good.
-
Do you think? To me it seems impossible that the buyer has publicly withdrawn and can find a way back in. Just the loss of face from the PL would be huge now. That was my view. I do wonder whether the buyers are considering/have suggested they are considering some sort of legal blitz on the PL for overstepping their boundaries/the criteria of the test. That might make the PL sit up and come to the table with some greater 'flexibility' if, as someone posted a short while ago, they only have revenues of £3m and assets of £0.5m. In theory, a piece of piss to financially outmuscle them. The Saudi's could get them to run up a £3m legal bill in no time at all just for shits and giggles.