workrate and style of play; solano was much more responsible and worked harder without the ball...he was also much more "south american" in terms of keeping possession - he didn't lose it a lot in stupid places
robert was very direct but didn't give a f*** about the team (in the way he played)...he got the ball and attacked, the rest of the midfield and defence covered for him a lot due to that...he was also prone to try and take people on in the wrong areas so to speak and got caught a lot, made up for it by scoring and providing plenty though, his end product was superb
i'm not saying i'd rather have 2 solano's, i'm saying the balance of them was right given the type of player they were
2 wingers like robert in the same team wouldn't have worked
anyways, tell me (and the others who disagree) why i'm wrong
Solano was never a workhorse. He was ineffective away from home and that's one of the reasons our away from didn't quite stand up to that fantastic record at S James'. 2002-03 is an excellent example of away form spoiling the party, so to speak. Let's not forget that we accumulated 71 points the season beforehand, teams have won it with around 75.
You put an identical player to Robert on the RW and you have a counter-attacking colossus, teams wouldn't have been able to deal with the pace and directness. Shearer would have scored 40.
If Bobby had the chance, he'd have two Roberts on the wings, every single day of the week.