win the CL with him actually doing something meaningful in the final
probably
This is one of the worst ways to make a point I've ever seen on here, by the way.
While we're at it for Shearer to be considered our best striker of modern times he'll have to have scored more goals than Jackie Milburn.
He's silenced nobody, he's still s***.
Are you still hoping we lose so he gets sacked, Mick?
I think we will suffer in the long term if he keeps winning just enough games to avoid the sack.
Yes.
Quite incredible that the above statement has just been made by one of Coloccini's biggest fans on here, like. Dawson has developed into a very good defender. Far better than any of out lot.
Would you consider taking him back knowing full on he's mercenary (knowing his true colors) if it meant he'd be our main central option and Remy & HBA would be on the flanks? Helping us massively in the goal scoring department? Just curious your thoughts.
Probably not, mate. I think we got the best 18 months of his career out of him anyway, tbh. Much rather we look elsewhere at a player who'd get the absolute out of the likes of Hatem and Remy.
Is it not almost as embarrassing to be associated solely with one player who, as good as he was, didn't help us win anything?
I'd be equally offended (not much at all, fwiw) by both responses. NUFC is better than both.
Such a lazy opinion
It really, really is. Not a massive fan of Defoe but outside the box he's twice the footballer Cisse is. Totally different players.