Jump to content

Incognito

Member
  • Posts

    31,630
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Incognito

  1. Well I've learned today that Janis Joplin had shit tits.
  2. No, that was some buffoon the club used to employ as the manager.
  3. Explains everything, being Accra poster.
  4. Poor goat probably couldn't walk after if rumour is to be believed.
  5. Incognito

    Adam Armstrong

    I know better than anyone that Coventry City supporters are full of shit. We could be in the same league next season and having to use Armstrong ourselves, so there's absolutely no way we'd be agreeing loans for next season now. That said, Coventry are absolutely desperate for a half decent keeper.
  6. [emoji38]This is the biggest cultural divide I've ever encountered on here. This mindset is more difficult to understand than your accents. The best team is the team left standing at the end. The season exists as preparation for the playoffs. That's all it's for, that's all it should ever be for. You don't make the playoffs, you learn from it and try to make them next year. That doesn't mean regular season games aren't incredibly important. They are; but not more than the playoffs. I'm American and I think this is the most ridiculous opinion ever. Actually, the part in bold isn't an opinion - it's just an incorrect statement. And to say regular season games in US sports are "incredibly important" is a gross exaggeration. The only sport where this is true is college football, which still has its own issues. The NFL it's true for half the season and then there are an increasing number of pointless games. Don't get me started on the NHL and NBA regular seasons. It's a great idea but it doesn't break up the hold the mega rich teams have over the league itself. They'll just spend even more and hoard even more players to avoid 4th. I'm not worried about the CL, parity in England will sort the CL out in time. Parity in your league will make it easily the strongest league. Massive do or die fixtures beyond what most of the other teams in Europe could ever dream of participating in makes the EPL stronger. Hell, it might even improve your national team, ffs. Hardened English players knowing what it means to perform when it's all on the line year after year instead of on those infrequent occasions when they land a cup final. Each team plays each other home and away. Absolutely no need for playoffs. The issue of mega rich teams won't be solved by giving them an extra half a dozen or so games which would no doubt add to their already bursting coffers. But it solved it here. With 162 games, you could argue there's even less need for playoffs in baseball, but we've got them and it's possible for a (comparatively) poor team to topple the teams spending hundreds of millions of dollars. This is due to teams taking an active role in improving themselves year after year (which imo does not happen in the EPL. Most teams work to maintain the status quo) which spreads the top talent around, and affords more opportunities for talent to develop. There isn't a need for playoffs in baseball (if they switched to a balanced schedule), but it's all about $$$. The baseball playoffs deliver the most random champion of any sport, even more so now with the WC games. It's a great idea but it doesn't break up the hold the mega rich teams have over the league itself. They'll just spend even more and hoard even more players to avoid 4th. I'm not worried about the CL, parity in England will sort the CL out in time. Parity in your league will make it easily the strongest league. Massive do or die fixtures beyond what most of the other teams in Europe could ever dream of participating in makes the EPL stronger. Hell, it might even improve your national team, ffs. Hardened English players knowing what it means to perform when it's all on the line year after year instead of on those infrequent occasions when they land a cup final. Each team plays each other home and away. Absolutely no need for playoffs. The issue of mega rich teams won't be solved by giving them an extra half a dozen or so games which would no doubt add to their already bursting coffers. But it solved it here. With 162 games, you could argue there's even less need for playoffs in baseball, but we've got them and it's possible for a (comparatively) poor team to topple the teams spending hundreds of millions of dollars. This is due to teams taking an active role in improving themselves year after year (which imo does not happen in the EPL. Most teams work to maintain the status quo) which spreads the top talent around, and affords more opportunities for talent to develop. They don't play each other the same amount of times, do they? Do each team play all of the others at all? There are two leagues. AL and NL. Every AL team plays each other an absolutely ungodly amount of times, and (I think) each division in the AL plays of the teams in a single division from the other league plus any local rival. This is relatively recent. Teams from the AL and NL never used to play at all unless they met in the World Series. So you've got all the AL teams going head to head over and over again, but we've still got playoffs and no one is upset. The schedule isn't balanced within the league let alone out of the league. This is true for all four major sports because of divisions and conferences. It's fine because there are playoffs, but for the millionth time - there is nothing more fair for declaring a champion than the format of the Premier League. Financial imbalance is a completely different topic. Cracking post.
  7. In theory it's a fantastic tournament, and I'm sure it was tremendous back in the day. Unfortunately, nobody with a realistic chance of winning it gives a fuck about it. You have to incentivize it, and I agree that giving the FA Cup winner a CL place would go a long way to doing that. Losing the Cup Winners Cup was what devalued the FA Cup, offering the winner a Uefa Cup/Europa League spot doesn't compensate at all.
  8. I'm not sure any of those 3 man marking could be described as playing it safe .
  9. The goal when Ighalo was offside and when Lascelles was our last man? He looks directly at Ighalo before the ball is played and doesn't make any effort to get near him. Just a lazy step up instead. Well, he had managed to perfectly execute the offside line to catch Ighalo, just the linesman fucked it up. The second goal was more Colo not doing his job properly, he should have been far stronger and closed Cathcarthorse down or even got a foot in to stop it getting to him.
  10. Manchester United fans want style and when they get that, then with the quality of player they usually have, then success generally follows. Since I've been watching football, Manchester United have always played with a verve and in an attacking manner. Except for three managers. Dave Sexton, who bought some right shite, Birtles and Davenport from Forest the main two, Moyes, who didn't really get long enough, but his direct style wasn't winning him many fans nor enough points, and LVG, who to my mind, actually is playing a less attractive brand than Moyes after spending a shitload more than him . Similarly, the same three managers are the only three in my period of watching who haven't won a trophy at Manchester United. So it's obvious, attack teams with the quality of player that Man United can always bring up or acquire, and success will follow. I'd have binned him well before now when Klopp was available,and given him the gig.
  11. Incognito

    Steve McClaren

    Never thought we'd see the day when a Newcastle team selection was made to deal with being scared of what Watford could do to us. They have a good work ethic but tweaking your system to try and deal with a hard work ethic is one, cowardly. Let them worry about us instead of isolating our striker who has caused far better defences than Watford's,trouble with some support. And two, it couldn't have given the team any kind of boost. What he was in effect saying to both his back 4 and the midfield was that man for man, he didn't think we could match their work ethic. Inspirational stuff. A bad day for McClaren, and with a few harder to garner points from games coming, one that should put him under pressure.
  12. Wonder what happened to Vic after here? He was struck down with the cantankerous bug way too soon .
  13. Not bad for someone who was being written off as a busted flush by some members of the press midweek, along with Vardy. Vardy thought Mahrez was a busted flush? [emoji6]
  14. Incognito

    Steve McClaren

    3-6-1. That is the formation we put out for most of the game today. Against Watford.
  15. Some people have said he should be leading the line like, Semtex is one that I can definitely recall He's the only "lead the line" type striker we have though. So Semtex is right.
  16. We'll have the last laugh when his left leg explodes. Why? I like the player, and wish the club had paid the 15m for him during the summer. He wanted to come here, we never made a bid. You know him , do you?
  17. Losing to an offside goal and one from Craig fucking Cathcart. Spawny cunts.
  18. When does it stop being "luck"? When it's easy chances he's missing.
×
×
  • Create New...